[no subject]

Thank you for uploading pirated SAM Titles I own the rights to. Please remove all Persona titles - as these are exclusively being sold by Sam Community - with proceeds going to charity. Thank you!

RE:

Opps , appologys , and i will remove from my side C -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Ledbury Sent: 24 April 2001 23:26 To: sam-users Subject: Thank you for uploading pirated SAM Titles I own the rights to. Please remove all Persona

RE:

Well done the one;s i know of , could you post a list of your copyrighted material on this list so that everyone is aware of your claims C -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Ledbury Sent: 24 April 2001 23:26 To: sam-users Subject: Thank

Fw: I want the following removed now!

I sent this privately to FT - but looks like he's not taking emails at present... Sorry, have to post it here instead! - Original Message - From: David Ledbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Frode Tenneboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:48 PM Subject: I want the following

Re:

No probs - and btw dont think I'm making a penny out of these - the proceeds are purely going to SC funds - and to charity. No proceeds on anything will be gained by myself Thanks - Original Message - From: Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, April 24,

RE:

Sure i have removed these from my collection , untill i have permission to keep them except for 04/24/2001 07:24PM143,780 Bats 'n' Balls Demo (1992) (Lord Insanity).ZIP 04/24/2001 07:24PM433,460 Contact Demos (19xx) (PD).ZIP 04/24/2001 07:24PM127,934 Craft Demo (1992)

Re:

I dont really care whats available elsewhere I do care what's hosted at nvg - Original Message - From: Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Ledbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: sam users sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:54 PM Subject: RE: Sure i have removed these

Re:

And for that matter - please remove the file samprime.sad.gz from : /pub/sam-coupe/magazines/misc/ - Original Message - From: David Ledbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 12:03 AM Subject: Re: I dont really care whats available elsewhere I

Re:

Please remove from incoming: Sam Prime(19xx).ZIP SamCo News Disk 1 (Jan 1992).ZIP SamCo News DIsk 2 (Feb 1992).ZIP SamCo News Disk 3 (Mar 1992).ZIP SamCo News Disk 4 (1992).ZIP SamCo News Disk 5 (1992).ZIP Thank you! - Original Message - From: David Ledbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE:

Opps i've started something know havn't i :) C -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Ledbury Sent: 25 April 2001 00:08 To: sam-users Subject: Re: And for that matter - please remove the file samprime.sad.gz from :

[no subject]

Please remove RecoverE from Incoming This belongs to Colin Piggot - and is not Public Domain!

Please remove:

Please remove: SAM Newsdisk magazines (all) from incoming SAM Prime from Incoming Thank you

PIRATED SOFTWARE ON NVG....

Please remove RecoverE from Incoming This belongs to Colin Piggot - and is not Public Domain! Indeed Recover-E is mine, and is STILL FOR SALE from myself - I would like to know who uploaded this and why I've made my feelings clear about Piracy before and am rather PISSED OFF

Re:

Chris, I tested your renamer, and I have 107 unknown rom images. I am very frustrated with the bugs like wrong software names, wrong authors, wrong year, etc. I hjave only 9 known ROM images, and those are originally from me, some of them are pirated and all of them have wrong names in your

RE:

hi alex, from the readme, it says that it is the first release, i've used the other good tools for a while now, and have found that they improve over time!, expect lots of bugs for a while, if you find any, report them to that hotmail address in the readme.. i've reported errors that i've

Re:

Also, I had to unpack all my images, since it stupidly doesn't accept sad.gz / SADv2 images. Also, it seemms that it refuses to accept SAD converted to DSK or vice versa. And, finally, it refuses to accept disks with more than 80 tracks (maybe all except 80, but I have only 80, 82 and 84).

RE:

Its not my renamer , i just dloaded it and ran it on my collection and then went on a Net search to find ones missing send any comments on wrong names to the addr @ bottom of this email do goodsamc scannew , and sent created TXT to addr @ bottom of this email also send images that you would like

RE:

i've had a look, and the db seems to run using a crc trye checking system (thats my assumption from running scannew anyway) so, sad converted to dsk, etc wont work until the db knows the crc of those dumps. probably the same thing applies for the 80 track disk thing, there may be many

Re: GoodSAMC

Aley Keprt wrote: I had to unpack all my images, since it stupidly doesn't accept sad.gz / SADv2 images. Yeah, seems odd that the program uses ZLib, but only for zip files - it didn't seem to like my .gz files either. Also, it seemms that it refuses to accept SAD converted to DSK or vice

RE: GoodSAMC

-Original Message- From: Simon Owen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2001 12:25 To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: Re: GoodSAMC Aley Keprt wrote: I had to unpack all my images, since it stupidly doesn't accept sad.gz / SADv2 images. Yeah, seems odd that the

Re: GoodSAMC

And, finally, it refuses to accept disks with more than 80 tracks (maybe all except 80, but I have only 80, 82 and 84). Must be a non-80-track thing, as it also complained about undersize SAD images - your 'alternative module player' comes on a small SAD image, and that had to be converted

RE: GoodSAMC

they'll get to that, trouble is, they have to filter out the dross first, if you look at the other good utils, any confirmed good dumps are marked ! thats what will probably happen to goodsamc, i dont know why the author allows crap to be listed in the renamed db, instead of just acknowledging the

RE: GoodSAMC

I just thought, no-one reads readme files, so they'll be emailing anything left after running goodsam, so its probably to save on inbox space, if everythings renamed just my 2p worth -Original Message- From: Dean Woodyatt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2001 14:02 To:

RE: GoodSAMC

You never know what is official. It contains tens of spectrum games collection or demos collection images. That's why I wrote it is a nonsense to make database of diskettes. I think we should build a database of ROMs instead. (real roms - MGT Sam Basic version 1,2,3..., SamCo ROM, etc.) Who

RE: GoodSAMC

werent they released as PD? -Original Message- From: Matthew J Craven [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2001 14:26 To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: RE: GoodSAMC You never know what is official. It contains tens of spectrum games collection or demos collection

RE: GoodSAMC

Dr A Wright (author) / SamCo Recievers / Format Not sure about PD , infact i haven't seen them anywhere -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dean Woodyatt Sent: 25 April 2001 14:32 To: 'sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no' Subject: RE: GoodSAMC werent they

RE: GoodSAMC

Aley Keprt wrote: Really? It's called Aley's instead of Alternative. I don't know who the f. wrote the worng name into the database. Heh - they should have known that there are no other 'A' words! ;-) And I don't know why it has undersized SAD. Isn't the file corrupted? My mistake - the

RE: GoodSAMC

werent they released as PD? No idea! I *thought* that was just Amstrad (even though they retain copyright). Did Samco, MGT actually do that? -Original Message- From: Matthew J Craven [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2001 14:26 To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no

RE: GoodSAMC

I have a dark and distant memory of Andy posting on the list that the SAM ROMs are PD. This was so that they could be distributed with SimCoupe. Luke -Original Message- From: Matthew J Craven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 02:34 To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no

RE: GoodSAMC

I have a dark and distant memory of Andy posting on the list that the SAM ROMs are PD. This was so that they could be distributed with SimCoupe. Luke Yes. It would be logical. That's good news then! --Matthew.

RE: GoodSAMC

Luke Trevorrow wrote: I have a dark and distant memory of Andy posting on the list that the SAM ROMs are PD. This was so that they could be distributed with SimCoupe. *forms a circle and joins hands* Allan? Can you hear us out there? Si

Re: GoodSAMC

Really? It's called Aley's instead of Alternative. I don't know who the f. wrote the worng name into the database. Heh - they should have known that there are no other 'A' words! ;-) !!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]@% They are other words too. I know at least one: Axoft ;-) I don't know what's wrong

RE: GoodSAMC

aley, make up a list of the ones your name should be in I've spoken with cowering before, i'll make sure it gets done! -Original Message- From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2001 15:23 To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: Re: GoodSAMC Really? It's

RE: GoodSAMC

Aley Keprt wrote: I don't know what's wrong on having my name at the beginning of some programs, jsut to distinguish them from other software. Other people or companies do it as well. e.g. Corel Draw, Microsoft Windows, Adobe Acrobat, Norton Commander, etc. It stands out to me because it's

RE: GoodSAMC

I think, that given the enthusiast nature of the sam coupe that people should be given full credit by name in the Db this wouldnt work for the NES, or Megadrive, but seeming as most stuff for sam was PD, this would be best! -Original Message- From: Simon Owen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: GoodSAMC

Dean Woodyatt wrote: I think, that given the enthusiast nature of the sam coupe that people should be given full credit by name in the Db this wouldnt work for the NES, or Megadrive, but seeming as most stuff for sam was PD, this would be best! Yep, agreed (I was only talking about the

Aley [Was: Re: GoodSAMC]

You should know that Aley is not my real name, it's my nick and I use it instead of Axoft, what I used in the past (1988-1993). I use it also instead of my real first name, since my real name cannot be written in western latin charset. (Unlike my surname, which is o.k. in western latin char set.)

Re: GoodSAMC

I think, that given the enthusiast nature of the sam coupe that people should be given full credit by name in the Db this wouldnt work for the NES, or Megadrive, but seeming as most stuff for sam was PD, this would be best! Yep, agreed (I was only talking about the program names before).

RE: Aley [Was: Re: GoodSAMC]

SiCoupe? Mmm. ;¬) -Original Message- From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2001 16:04 To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: Aley [Was: Re: GoodSAMC] You should know that Aley is not my real name, it's my nick and I use it instead of Axoft,

RE: Help me :)

At 20:09 24/04/01 +0100, you wrote: So that in xx Years time , anyone could (if they wished) , see what the Sam Coupe was , and see what People spent a lot of time deveoping , like or not it's a part of History now (IMHO). That I can appreciate; I'm just not sure how trying to build a list of

RE: Help me :)

It's funny in how it seems that more people are putting more effort in developing stuff to archive/emulate the SAM, than /for/ the SAM when it was alive'n'kicking... -Original Message- From: Paul Walker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:02 PM To:

Re: Help me :)

It's funny in how it seems that more people are putting more effort in developing stuff to archive/emulate the SAM, than /for/ the SAM when it was alive'n'kicking... Definitely. -Original Message- From: Paul Walker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:02 PM

Re: GoodSAMC

At 17:05 25/04/01 +0200, Aley Keprt wrote: I see I won't release my programs for Sam, otherwise you will put me in the lowest coders quality cathegory. Interesting assertion - that PD programs are the lowest quality. Presumably you also rank people who write software for money as the best

Re: GoodSAMC

I see I won't release my programs for Sam, otherwise you will put me in the lowest coders quality cathegory. Interesting assertion - that PD programs are the lowest quality. Presumably you also rank people who write software for money as the best coders? Usually people who really can earn

Re: GoodSAMC

Usually people who really can earn money from *it*, don't do *it* for free. ;-) Actually, I know my software for Sam, and I know what cathegory they are. :-( If somebody is going to cathegorize authors by quality, I will fall into the lowest one, if I upload anything more than 10% of my

Re: GoodSAMC

At 18:50 25/04/01 +0200, Aley wrote: Usually people who really can earn money from *it*, don't do *it* for free. ;-) I'd be interested to hear what you think of, say, free software, then. (In the GNU sense.) Or people who both write software for money, and for free... -- Paul

Re: GoodSAMC

Usually people who really can earn money from *it*, don't do *it* for free. ;-) I'd be interested to hear what you think of, say, free software, then. (In the GNU sense.) Or people who both write software for money, and for free... off topic

Re: GoodSAMC

At 19:51 25/04/01 +0200, you wrote: I'd be interested to hear what you think of, say, free software, then. (In the GNU sense.) Or people who both write software for money, and for free... off topic Private email? -- Paul

Re: Fw: I want the following removed now!

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:52:53 +0100 David Ledbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sent this privately to FT - but looks like he's not taking emails at present... Not in the middle of the night. :) Sorry, have to post it here instead! Anyone else with similar requests with the huge (497 files)