Bonsoir Andrew,
I've just tried to test failover with the two syntax. I use ssh
tunnel to connect to ldapserver ( using 127.0.0.1 )
With
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1:10389/,
ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1:13389, guest
it works after more slowly but it works.
Has anybody managed to do this automatically (or not) as I am in need of a
solution that DOES NOT require the user to enter the command line. Thanks in
advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi there
Make this:
valid users = @LABOR\domain admins
write list = @LABOR\domain admins
write useres = @LABOR\domain admins
What if the domain user doesn't have a local user on the unix machine ?
How do I get round that ??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Good $TIME! ;)
I'm having the following problem with Samba 3.0.0 on a Solaris 8 machine.
root_s07nfs:/opt/samba3/private/ ls -la
total 24
drwxrwxr-x 2 root other 96 Oct 14 10:12 .
drwxrwxr-x 9 root other 4096 Oct 9 07:15 ..
-rw--- 1 root root8192 Oct
| This line:
| valid users = @wheel matt
| Should read
| valid users = @wheel, matt
Doesn't matter. smbd will accept whitespace or commas
as delimiters in this context.
cheers, jerry
Thanks for the correction...I was always under the (now
mistaken)impression that Samba used the , to separate
Hi :)
I'm using samba-3.0 with LDAP as a PDC under FreeBSD-5.1.
Note that I compiled samba --with-ldap, not --with-ldapsam.
I'm having a strange problem with TLS ldap certificates.
If I set the following option in smb.conf: ldap ssl = start_tls, I get
errors like this:
$ pdbedit -L
Failed to
Resending as I'm no closer to a solution and really would appreciate any
help that anyone has to offer.
Hi,
Please cc me on any replies as I'm not subscribed.
First, I've seen reference to this problem on the list but no solution, eg.:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=106032316504352w=2
# pdbedit -v -a -m -u tardis
ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to add user dn=
uid=tardis$,ou=Machines,dc=amazing-internet,dc=net with: Object class
violation
object class 'sambaSamAccount' requires attribute 'sambaSID'
Did you create the machine account in /etc/passwd or in ldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:00:15 +0200
From: J. Strohschnitter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Joining a domain without using root or administrator
To: samba-liste [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Hi List!
i am using samba 3.0 with ldap. but when my users log on the get an
warning that their password will expiring in the nexte days.
how do i turn off these password expiring functionality, so that the
user never have to change their password?
best regards,
Thomas Otto
--
Thomas Otto
Alexey Lobanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto nel messaggio
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Erik.
:~$ mount
.
/dev/md0 on /home type ext2 (rw,nosuid,nodev,usrquota,acl)
~$ uname -a
Linux woody 2.4.21 #2 Thu Aug 21 17:20:40 MSD 2003 i686 unknown
oops woody acl samba?
sorry if i put myself in the
I got winbind working!! For anyone who is interested here is what my
smb.conf looks like -
[global]
workgroup = DOMAIN
server string = winbind client
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
dns proxy = no
Hello.
On 14 Oct 2003 at 11:51, Massimo Crisantemo wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Massimo Crisantemo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:51:57 +0200
Subject:[Samba] Re: security
:~$ mount
.
/dev/md0 on
Hi,
I am running Debian/unstable with Samba-3.0.0-final and a few problems
to do with Samba, some minor, some severe. On the system affected these
applications are in use:
Samba, tomcats, java sdk, several apache 1.3.26, typo3, php 4.3.3
There is a variety of symptoms connected with
ok. now i know how to set it to 30 days...
is there a limit or a number to set it to unlimited?
cu Thomas
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
pdbedit -v -P 'maximum password age' -C 2592000
( to set Thirty days before expiration , -C in seconds... The first time
I set it to 300 seconds thinking in
jean-marc pouchoulon said the following on 14/10/03 10:40:
# pdbedit -v -a -m -u tardis
ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to add user dn=
uid=tardis$,ou=Machines,dc=amazing-internet,dc=net with: Object class
violation
object class 'sambaSamAccount' requires attribute 'sambaSID'
Did you create
Check that the time is synchronized between the 2 machines.
Axel Suppantschitsch wrote:
Well, I've got the three tickets now, but there is still the error in
winbindd.log:
[2003/10/14 10:34:51, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(269)
krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found)
they sould be created
on the fly as they were with 3.0.0beta1.
As I can see, with 3.0 stable this is not done.
pdbedit -a -m testonsddd$ -D99
...
ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to add user dn=
uid=testonsddd$,ou=pc,o=g,c=fr with: Object c
lass violation
But a
--
Gildevane Aparecido Ferreira
Administrador de Rede
Depto de Telecomunicações e Redes
Gerência de Informática - PUC-Campinas
Tel. 0XX 19 3756-7339 / 3756-7337
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.puc-campinas.edu.br
Hello all,
Im having some trouble with netlogon.
I created a script called todos.bat that isnt getting executed when the users
logon.
My configuration is the following:
domain logons = yes
logon script=todos.bat %U
name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast
wins support = yes
dns proxy = yes
jean-marc pouchoulon said the following on 14/10/03 12:10:
they sould be created
on the fly as they were with 3.0.0beta1.
As I can see, with 3.0 stable this is not done.
pdbedit -a -m testonsddd$ -D99
...
ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to add user dn=
uid=testonsddd$,ou=pc,o=g,c=fr
Well, I've got the three tickets now, but there is still the error in
winbindd.log:
[2003/10/14 10:34:51, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(269)
krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found)
Cheers, Axel.
Quoting Gavin Davenport [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds like :
make
Hi, I'm trying to configure a Samba 3.0 as a PDC. I've problems with
users on Win2k, probably because of machine accounts. I'm using tdbsam
(when it works, I'll try ldapsam). I can add users with
pdbedit -a, if users are in /etc/passwd. If an user is not in /etc/passwd,
I can't add it with
Hello,
I singed up for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] using a one-time
email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and now I get virus
laden spam messages at that address about every ninety seconds
-- thanks.
Perhaps you could run your email lists more responsibly in
the future.
Joe Frisbie
--
To unsubscribe
this number is 9 Oct 2003 -
pwd must changed immediately.
i am searching for the unlimited number in sambapwdmustchange.
the sambapwdcanchange is eqal to sambapwdlastset.
does anyone know the number for 13 dec 1901 21:45:51 GMT???
cu Thomas
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
I can see in my own ldap :
Can someone clarify how do I add machine accounts and user accounts?
Do they have to exist already in /etc/passwd?
Pdbedit is reading your smb.conf and specially the backend you
choose. What is your backend in smb.conf ? I think your are using
ldapbackend.
Machine account
On 14 Oct 2003, J. Frisbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I singed up for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] using a one-time
email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and now I get virus
laden spam messages at that address about every ninety seconds
-- thanks.
This kind of complaint is explicitly off topic
Mensaje citado por Michael Gasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
a short answer
yes, you always need this posix-account - no matter which backend you use
i'm using ldap with this structure
users in ou=users,... (posix and samba)
machines in ou=machines,... (posix and samba)
and i'm not able to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I.M.H.O
you could write a root prexec script for your netlogon share, wich would
check for runing smbd with the uid of the connection, and return an
error if there is such. And specifying root prexec close = yes on the
netlogon share, you could deny
Hi all ,
I will have a Samba server soon running in PDC mode from within
the 172.16.56.* subnet. I want to make sure that clients on other 172.16
subnets, such as 172.16.5.* or 172.16.10.* will be able to access the
PDC and hence be able to log on to the domain serviced by the PDC
Hello.
On 14 Oct 2003 at 8:02, J. Frisbie wrote:
From: J. Frisbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:02:44 -0400
Copies to: Subject:[Samba] SPAM
Hello,
I
Hi people!
I have a samba-PDC (samba-3.0.0-2) based on LDAP backend
(ldapsam_compat). The PDC is working fine, with machines
added automatically to the domain, printing with up/downloading
of printer drivers in place and correct display of users/groups
in the windows properies box.
However when
Yes, too many fair subscribers of this list still use popular inherently
insecure
mailreaders. I'm afraid, Samba team can do nothing with it.
The security of the mailreader has nothing to do with it. I run Eudora, and
my corporate installation of Norton AntiVirus catches every one of the
Space is up front, first character, and I'm not permitted to change it
:(
These are my current versions. I don't know how to check the version of
smbfs, but though it was part of the samba package.
# uname -a
Linux mcitylinux 2.4.20-8smp #1 SMP Thu Mar 13 17:45:54 EST 2003 i686
i686 i386
We have a problem with shares that we would like to keep read-only for
some users; it worked with 2.2.8a, but with 3.0.0 there is this odd
behaviour: Users with read-only privilege can browse the files, can
copy them out of the share (eg to their own hard disks) and open the
copies, and can open
I configured the samba to function with mysql, this functioning perfect, but it would
like that it nao tied the user of mysql with the usuario of/etc/passwd of linux,
exists some skill.
thanks,
Fernando Athayde
From Brazil
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hi all.
I upgraded one of my servers to Samba 3.0.0 over the weekend, using the
source. Since doing so, I have had a huge number of errors logged on
that system that are all related to usage of the smbmont command.
Running smbmount (or mount.smbfs) gives the following error:
mount.smbfs:
Greg Louis wrote:
open files in the share with Excel, for example, or Access or AutoCad,
a dialogue is displayed to the effect that the file can't be found.
Users with write access don't have this problem. AFAIK the apps aren't
trying to write into the files.
They don't write to that file,
I just put the mount commands in the rc.local. Maybe there's a better way?
--
Chris
Do not reply to this address.
The contact page below is a spam limiting device.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
http://realcomputerguy.com/contact.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
yes, i'm spamed heavly because of this list too .. i had to install
spamassassin and a email server antiviruss and qmail-scanner, and i
still recive alot of trash, think i'm goind to enable email ident too ..
This could stop almost everything, anyway , the mail list admins can't
do anything,
This could stop almost everything, anyway , the mail list admins can't
do anything, beacuse it isn't related to the server security/filtering
Sure they could. If the members' email addresses were only available to the
members (rather than being available via Usenet/Google News, public
archives,
Alexander Skwar wrote:
unix password sync = Yes
Setting this to No helped.
Alexander Skwar
--
Signatur vorübergehend deaktiviert.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Larry Liu wrote:
Thanks, John, for the quick reply.
My test environment is like you recommended, only one WINS running on
Samba 3.0.0. The interesting part is: on the server subnet, we can see
all the win32 and samba clients from other subnets which have at least
one
I'm needing a strategy to accomplish the following:
We have AD, with Server for NIS working on the DC. I've got NIS
successfully working for login - or at least the client starts to login and
then complains about a lack of home dir, which is fine for now.
Each AD user has a directory on a
I put into the rc.local:
smbmount //server/user /home/user/Documents -o
username=user,password=xxx,uid=503,gid=503
(one line)
--
Best Regards
Thomas J Spuhler
Manager International Sales
TUSONIX, Inc
All Tusonix outgoing e-mail has been scanned for viruses
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 23:22,
Hidiho!
I have two small problems and I hope anybody can help me.
First a short description, what I want to do:
We are moving lots of data from a win2k server to a samba 3.0 server (on a
debian woody). The win2k server is the pdc of our network and will not be
deactivated. The samba server will
Hi. To begin with, I have a freshly built RedHat Linux 8.0 box running samba 2.2.8a.
The kernel version is 2.4.18-14. I downloaded and compiled samba from source. I am
using LPRng-3.8.9-6 as my printing system. The attached printer is a Lexmark Z22
printer and it is attached to the
Can I add the winbind generated uid's or gid's to the unix group to apply permissions
on file or directories? I have a windows PDC and the Samba server is a member
server. I have winbind working correctly but I'd like to be able to add 'domain+user'
or 'uid' given to the user to a unix
[2003/10/14 00:22:40, 6] param/loadparm.c:lp_file_list_changed(2302)
lp_file_list_changed()
file /etc/samba/smb.conf - /etc/samba/smb.conf last mod_time: Tue Oct 14
00:20:50 2003
[2003/10/14 00:22:40, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(81)
added interface ip=192.168.0.12 bcast=192.168.0.255
An article appeared in IT Week (UK) yesterday, saying how
Samba 3 trounced Windows 2003 for file and print serving.
Steve
--
home steve at gbnet.org
NetTek Ltdtel/fax +44-(0)207 483 2455
Email to SMS steve - pager (at) gbnet dot net
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Le 14/10/2003 08:22, « John Simovic » [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Has anybody managed to do this automatically (or not) as I am in need of a
solution that DOES NOT require the user to enter the command line. Thanks in
advance.
*** On Linux or Windows?
In any case you create login scripts
Le 13/10/2003 12:20, « C J K » [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Dear all,
i have a linux RH8 with samba program running on it. i am trying to setup
Samba from webmin program. My question is that should i create a SAMBA user?
*** Yes you should.
And if yes when i see the linux HDD from a
(Paring the CC list a bit.)
-Original Message-
From: J. Frisbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not send messages to the list with machine parseable
return addresess.
Make the reply to address the mailing list, not the person
who sent the message.
This is a bad idea. See:
Is it possible to have the samba shares accessible to anyone when ADS
security is used? Currently all domain users are working great! Even if
your not joined to the domain, but your login in windows matches a domain
login, you will still pull up the root shares (although access is
restricted). If
I do not understand wahat you are saying:
swen viruses i receive are of three flavours, mstly being 156 kB in size
neve seen a 55kB one ..
anyway i got about 180 each day and i am very unhappy.
About showing in the lists: I use three addresses for lists, but oddly
enough i receive about
Hi, I'm still fighting to implement a domain in our network. Now
I'd like to have a user (say root) that has Administrative privileges on
all Win2k/XP machienes (to install programs for example). Is that
possible?
Also, what does the sambaAcctFlags (account flags) mean? Does it
I have to agree with the others on the need for the mailing list to do
something.
I just posted to the Samba list for the first time in a couple of
months, and since doing so, have gotten 3 or 4 dozen of these virus
emails. And I run server based email filters - these are the ones that
are
-Original Message-
From: Jim Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to agree with the others on the need for the mailing
list to do something.
I suspect the main culprit is the USENET gateway. Any post to USENET with a
valid email address seems to immediately attract lots of
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:31:59AM -0500, Jim Morris wrote about '[Samba]
smb_register_charset error in Samba 3.0.0':
I upgraded one of my servers to Samba 3.0.0 over the weekend, using the
source. Since doing so, I have had a huge number of errors logged on
that system that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guess Logi wrote:
|
| Does anyone know where can I get Samba 2.2.8a?
See http://samba.org/samba.ftp/old-versions/
| Is it okay to have Samba 2.2.8a on PDC and Samba 3.0 on BDC?
| Both servers should have to have exact same Samba version.?
They don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gémes Géza wrote:
| Gémes Géza írta:
|
| Hi all,
|
| I have an LDAP based PDC. I'm planing to move to SASL-GSSAPI
| authentication for LDAP. Is it possible with samba? How?, with nss+pam?
Samba 3.09 doesn't support SASL for the ldapsam[_compat] passdb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandr Pushkin wrote:
| Hi!
| I've got FreeBSD+Samba 3 on it. Will winbind work with Samba PDC?
Yes. It does here.
cheers, jerry
~ --
~ Hewlett-Packard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
| What is the role of winbindd_privileged/pipe ?
To prevent non-root users from accessing certain
winbindd functions.
| I have a few problem with redhat 9 , unlinked with samba
| does winbind work on other site with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gasch wrote:
| hey there
|
| i have a simple question
|
| after dumping the SAM into LDAP (net rpc vampire), switching off the old
| NT PDC an introducing Samba 3.0 Final as the new BDC:
|
| - do i have to rejoin the domain with each
I have attached the 2nd log file. I have zipped it because of the size.
Bob.
begin 666 smblog-sunstar.zip
[EMAIL PROTECTED](`-D3B]([EMAIL PROTECTED]EH`0`2VUB;]G+7-U;G-T87(N
M='AT[#UI]O*D9\WOZ+K;:[EMAIL PROTECTED]RPN22K/%1\JV=F\+5N%0!((2(!
[EMAIL
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 02:39 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
I suspect the main culprit is the USENET gateway. Any post to USENET
with a
valid email address seems to immediately attract lots of virus traffic.
Maybe it's time to eliminate the USENET gateway. If USENET wasn't dead
before,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
|
| a few days ago I upgraded to Samba 3.0.0.
| The upgrade worked flawlessly.
| I just wonder why the force user setting does no longer work like it
| should..
| This is an excerpt from my smb.conf-file:
|
| [200a3i]
|
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:03:33PM +0100, Steve Kennedy wrote:
An article appeared in IT Week (UK) yesterday, saying how
Samba 3 trounced Windows 2003 for file and print serving.
Yeah, interesting article. I'd like to see the Netbench
specifics statement though.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:27:10PM -0500, Jim Morris wrote:
If people want to hide their return e-mail address to avoid this
problem, they are free to do so. Just create something creative for
your From:. Most decent e-mail clients will allow you to either change
From: on an individual message
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 16:10, Jim Morris wrote:
I vote to kill the mailing list - Usenet gateway, if that is what is
causing these virus email attacks on subscribers. If I wanted to use
Usenet, I would go read comp.os.protocols.smb or whatever, directly!
I disagree. A Usenet search via
I was previously using 2.2.8 and had 'domain admin group = @smbadmin' set
making anybody in the smbadmin group an administrator. However, with
samba-3.0 that went away. So, I set 'admin users = @smbadmin name1 name2...'
but it doesn't give my users administrative privilege. The logs seem to
J. Frisbie wrote:
Hello,
I singed up for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] using a one-time
email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and now I get virus
laden spam messages at that address about every ninety seconds
-- thanks.
...
The most effective step to reduce this is to restrict posting to
subscribed list
It was foretold that on Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:12:02 -0500, Gerald (Jerry)
Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] would mumble:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
|
| a few days ago I upgraded to Samba 3.0.0.
| The upgrade worked flawlessly.
| I just wonder why the force
I'm having problems getting my iplanet ds 5.1 sp2 working w/
samba. I have a bunch of question but I cant find it in the
documentation. I'm running samba 3.0 and have an existing
ldap server w/ 100K entries.
1.Do you really need all of the attributes in the samba
schmema. It sure seems
I just tested the process/uid check theory. Upon initail login the new
smbd process is owned by the user but with no activity on any shares
it switches to being owned by root in a minute. I guess I could use a
script to touch a file with the users login name or uid and just check
for that
Just to further confirm the idea that this mailing list is associated
with the current surge in receipts of the SWEN virus, I signed up for
this list when I upgraded to Samba 2.2.3 on Oct 1. An hour later I began
receiving mass quantities of SWEN-infected emails.
TO date I've received 860 from
Hi All,
I'm trying to setup Samba 3 with RedHat Advance Server 2.1
I compiled Samba with the following switches : --with-winbind --with-smbmount
--with-smbwrapper --with-pam --with-pam_smb
After I make, make install I try to run SWAT and it comes up to the login window.
When I try to
I'm using NIS for authentication, and would like to use auto.home to mount a
particular share on an NT server as $HOME when an NIS-mapped user logs in.
I'd rather have the mount occur at each login rather than at boot, as we
have a total of seven NT shares which potentially could contain a given
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jared Rypka-Hauer wrote:
| Objectively, I'm
| guessing that in the current political climate a case
| could be made for the idea that, having been notified
| their list is being targeted and should they do
| nothing to prevent further abuse, they
I'm new to Samba, and I have a few minor questions for which I need answers
before I start this grandiose adventure in connectivity.
I current have a small home network, consisting of:
(1) Mandrake Linux 9.1 workstation
(1) Windows 2000 Pro workstation
(1) Windows XP Pro file/print server
Stripping emails of addresses or at LEAST putting up a warning on the
signup page and providing an option to not have your email address
listed to the world (not sure if that's there already or not) would do
something for future subscribers to stem the raging tide of crap that's
been streaming
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Davenport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 4:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share
Hi there
Make this:
valid users = @LABOR\domain admins
Hi all-
I'm fairly new to samba, but have been using 2.2.8 on a local subnet,
192.168.0.x, without problem. The PC with samba is running NetBSD, and
has 4 ethernet i/fs, all on different subnets, on different hubs, and
has Windows 2k clients. I now need to switch samba to two of the other
i/fs
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:59:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [200a3i]
| path = /home/www_200a3i/public_html
| valid users = peter, niklas
| admin users = peter
| force user = www_200a3i
| force group = www
neither files / directories are created using the
gurus,
i want to implement ldap authentication server and
also a samba server, but in different computer. Is it
possible? How should go with this? tnx in advance!
eric
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
On 14 Oct 2003, J. Frisbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you like us to do differently?
I see your original message was a bit misleading: you said that you
singed up for the samba, but in fact you also posted to the list,
thus disclosing your address.
First of all: we don't disclose the
Hi there. I need to recompile my samba I am seeing... ie, with ads
support. For those of you you have it working, can I get some info from
you... that being, what I need in order to successfully compile it with
ads support, and what is needed in my compile...is it just --with
kerb4=dir. Anyways,
I always wondered how much mindless, unthinking and thankless abuse it
would take to provoke a response.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jared Rypka-Hauer wrote:
| Objectively, I'm
| guessing that in
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:13:01 -0500, Jared Rypka-Hauer wrote:
Just to further confirm the idea that this mailing list is associated with
the current surge in receipts of the SWEN virus, I signed up for this list
when I upgraded to Samba 2.2.3 on Oct 1. An hour later I began receiving
mass
Hello
I am trying to upgrade samba to samba-3.0,
I have source rpm from samba site and I have been trying to recompile rpm
with spec as following
--with-mmap \
--with-pam \
--with-pam_smbpass \
--with-piddir=/var/run \
--with-privatedir=%{_sysconfdir}/samba
Sounds like a question for the Samba mailing lists,
see http://www.samba.org/samba/archives.html.
Kurt
At 07:18 PM 10/14/2003, jawed abbasi wrote:
Hello
I am trying to upgrade samba to samba-3.0,
I have source rpm from samba site and I have been trying to recompile rpm
with spec as
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:55:42AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
Just to further confirm the idea that this mailing list is associated with
the current surge in receipts of the SWEN virus, I signed up for this list
when I upgraded to Samba 2.2.3 on Oct 1. An hour later I began receiving
mass
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 16:18, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Bonsoir Andrew,
I've just tried to test failover with the two syntax. I use ssh
tunnel to connect to ldapserver ( using 127.0.0.1 )
With
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1:10389/,
I did it on purpose
I found the 2 offending DEBUG lines, and found also they were not
compiling (may totally b e a problem of mine).
As there aren't any other DEBUG lines in that file, I tought you
committed that DEBUG statement by mistake.
I should have asked, but it was late, sorry.
Do it
Date: Tue Oct 14 07:43:41 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17072/include
Added Files:
tdbsam2_parse_info.h
Log Message:
sorry folks, forgot to cvs add/remove before commit.
Revisions:
tdbsam2_parse_info.h
Date: Tue Oct 14 07:43:41 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/sam
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17072/sam
Added Files:
gums_tdbsam2.c
Removed Files:
gumm_tdb.c
Log Message:
sorry folks, forgot to cvs add/remove before commit.
Revisions:
Date: Tue Oct 14 07:43:41 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17072/passdb
Added Files:
pdb_gums.c
Log Message:
sorry folks, forgot to cvs add/remove before commit.
Revisions:
pdb_gums.c NONE = 1.1
Date: Tue Oct 14 07:50:36 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17838
Modified Files:
configure.in
Log Message:
fix typo
Revisions:
configure.in1.487 = 1.488
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Simo wrote:
I did it on purpose
I found the 2 offending DEBUG lines, and found also they were not
compiling (may totally b e a problem of mine).
As there aren't any other DEBUG lines in that file, I tought you
committed that DEBUG statement by mistake.
I should have
Date: Tue Oct 14 17:01:03 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30163/libsmb
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
smb_signing.c
Log Message:
Enable us to see what sequence number we were expecting when we fail a sign
(should
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
