Does that mean we can use the windows acl's ??
posix acl, has only RWX, with windows you have a bunch of options extra ?!
(like write, but no delete, modify, list folder content ect. ect. )
or am i completely off here ?!?!
Cheers, nice work dudes..
Collen
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Hello,
i have got a serious problem with fileuploads on SMB shares.
Iam implementing a program that watches a folder for new file and show status
e.g. incoming, growing, complete. With FTP and simply copying from another
folder on the same box there is no problem. But if i use smb to copy a
Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at samba.org writes:
I will leave the RedHat-9 packaging files in for the 3.0.25pre2
release that we are currently working on, but unless I
hear an outcry of objection or get new package maintainer,
the RedHat-9 files will be removed before the final 3.0.25
Hello,
i have got a serious problem with fileuploads on SMB shares.
Iam implementing a program that watches a folder for new file and show status
e.g. incoming, growing, complete. With FTP and simply copying from another
folder on the same box there is no problem. But if i use smb to copy a
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:39:51PM -0800, Jim McInerny wrote:
/ I have been a loyal user of SAMBA since about 1996(?), and I recently
/ / upgraded a RH linux based system from by skipping a few generations /
/ and going directly from rh9 to FC5. Mostly everything is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
I'm trying to make works this script...from linux it works right with
all users...but in win...it fails when try to do this line of script:
chomp($pass=STDIN);
In win i got this error:
No tiene permiso para cambiar su contraseña
you dont have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Collen,
Does that mean we can use the windows acl's ??
posix acl, has only RWX, with windows you have a
bunch of options extra ?! (like write, but no
delete, modify, list folder content ect. ect. )
or am i completely off here ?!?!
It means
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Jeter wrote:
I'm having a randomly occurring problem with some of the laptops that
we maintain. They are joined to our Samba domain (samba-3.0.14a-1).
Every once in a while when they are disconnected from the local network
they will drop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2007 12:23 AM, nix_kot wrote:
winbind cache time = 15
After restart winbinnd, newusers groups have been shown. :/
But command: id newuser
don't working... :(
You need to setup nss to get the info from winbind.
Kind
Hi all,
I am going to be in the process of updating my custom system policy
templates (probably within a month or two) and I am asking for what
policies anyone is in need of to help them deploy samba as a domain
controller.
Currently I basically have a single template.adm file, a few people have
Mike Petersen schrieb:
Hi all,
I am going to be in the process of updating my custom system policy
templates (probably within a month or two) and I am asking for what
policies anyone is in need of to help them deploy samba as a domain
controller.
Currently I basically have a single
On 3/22/07, Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that mean we can use the windows acl's ??
It means that smbd can load a VFS plugin to deal with
different ACL models on a per share basis. You still have
to convert the Windows security descriptor to a form
that means something
Здравствуйте, Felipe.
Вы писали 22 марта 2007 г., 21:20:15:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2007 12:23 AM, nix_kot wrote:
winbind cache time = 15
After restart winbinnd, newusers groups have been shown. :/
But command: id newuser
don't working... :(
You
Hi All,
Using Debian stable 2.4.27 with Samba 3.0.24
Currently experiencing a problem where I am trying to back up a
mailstore, which is in Maildir format. This has been working fine up
until about 2 weeks ago.
The mailstore is 88GB in total, which is 150,000+ individual mail files.
The drive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorkil,
Somehow I understand your decision, but personally I regret
it. I run SAMBA built from the source RPM on an old RH 7.1.
It is still much easier to build from the package than
building from the tar doing all configuration manually.
You
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:07:01AM +0100, Timo Hirt wrote:
Hello,
i have got a serious problem with fileuploads on SMB shares.
Iam implementing a program that watches a folder for new file and show status
e.g. incoming, growing, complete. With FTP and simply copying from another
folder
Nope. Won't happen. Share modes are share modes and byte
range locks are byte range locks. We will not add code that
mixes those two. This is really something the app must take
care of.
I understand your point of view.
But, we do/can NOT want to modify our OS2 applications.
So, we have to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:35:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand your point of view.
But, we do/can NOT want to modify our OS2 applications.
So, we have to keep OS2 deny mode method and migrate OS2 SMB clients 1 by
1 to Linux NFS client with no loss of file integrity...
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:35:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea about another way to resolve this point ?
You might want to talk to the Linux kernel guys about adding
Windows-style share modes. If the Linux kernel added those
with exact Windows semantics, it would be trivial to pass
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:48:32AM +0100, Rupert Kolb wrote:
But this is common practice:
Very few of our user know, where one of the 100 (logical) disks reside.
They use one of the few samba servers and follow symbolic links (to auto
mounted nfs disks).
And I prefer to be able to move disk
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 18:35 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nope. Won't happen. Share modes are share modes and byte
range locks are byte range locks. We will not add code that
mixes those two. This is really something the app must take
care of.
I understand your point of view.
But, we
Hey list,
Having a strange issue on a new File server. This system is running the
64-bit version of Fedora 5 running kernel 2.6.20-1.2300.fc5 and version
3.0.24-1.fc5 of Samba.
This system is functioning as a backup to a primary system that is
configured the same way. Same OS, hardware, etc.
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:58 -0500, Brandon wrote:
Hey list,
Having a strange issue on a new File server. This system is running the
64-bit version of Fedora 5 running kernel 2.6.20-1.2300.fc5 and version
3.0.24-1.fc5 of Samba.
See this https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4145
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2007 01:31 PM, nix_kot wrote:
You received my configuration files?
No, I didn't.
If is not present, I shall include them in a body of
the letter! What you mean under setup nss?
Configure the NSS. nsswitch.conf and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
I'm trying to make works this script...from linux it works right with
all users...but in win...it fails when try to do this line of script:
chomp($pass=STDIN);
In win i got this error:
No tiene permiso para cambiar su contraseña
you dont have
Hi Mike,
Mike Petersen schrieb:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:58 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
HI Mike,
creating policies is always welcome,
i dont tried vista adms for now,
cause i dont think most of my customers will switch to it,
the plan is to get totally out of m$.
I am in the same
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Hi Mike,
Mike Petersen schrieb:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:58 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
HI Mike,
creating policies is always welcome,
i dont tried vista adms for now,
cause i dont think most of my customers will switch to it,
the plan is to get totally out
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Hi Mike,
Mike Petersen schrieb:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:58 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
HI Mike,
creating policies is always welcome,
i dont tried vista adms for now,
cause i dont think most of my customers will switch to it,
the plan is to get totally out
Thanks for all of the links, I can't read German but I did manage to get
some info from them. Also thanks for the link to the article on the new
admx format - I don't know why MS is changing everything to something x
(docx, xlsx and now admx) - I preferred the old format anyway, the
Microsoft
Mike Petersen schrieb:
Thanks for all of the links, I can't read German but I did manage to get
some info from them. Also thanks for the link to the article on the new
admx format - I don't know why MS is changing everything to something x
(docx, xlsx and now admx) - I preferred the old
dear all,
i have two server,
smb1 act as PDC
Debian 3.1
Samba 3.0.14a-Debian
OpenLDAP 2.3.32
smb2 act as fileserver auth to PDC via winbindd
FC3
Samba 3.0.24
the problems are :
i can get the groups and users when running getent passwd and getent group
from smb1.
but i just can get the groups
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-22 08:17:30 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21928
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21928
Log:
fix the interface uuid of wzcsvc.
see http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/msrpc_wzcsvc.html
and
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5298
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
Author: jerry
Date: 2007-03-22 12:36:18 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21929
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21929
Log:
Grab Makefile.in from SAMBA_3_0 tree fix a compile
problem with shadow_copy_test.c reported by
Karolin Seeger [EMAIL
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5299
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
timestamp: Thu 2007-03-22
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5301
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
timestamp: Thu 2007-03-22
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-22 17:35:34 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21931
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21931
Log:
include acl/libacl.h is present
I'm not sure if this should go into 3.0.25... it fixes a compiler warning about
a missing
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-22 17:37:01 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21932
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21932
Log:
fix compiler warning.
maybe also for 3.0.25
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/libsmbclient.c
Changeset:
Author: jerry
Date: 2007-03-22 18:09:21 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21933
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21933
Log:
Change the write_sock() call in pam_winbind_request()
to not request a privileged pipe operation for everything
as this
On Mar 22, 2007, at 10:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-22 17:35:34 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21931
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21931
Log:
include acl/libacl.h is present
[snip]
Modified:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-22 18:16:36 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21934
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21934
Log:
fix the build sorry
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/replace/system/filesys.h
Changeset:
Modified:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-03-22 18:36:09 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21935
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21935
Log:
Revert obviously not sufficiently tested code -- sorry for the pain. I am
afraid I was basically off the net for the day
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-22 18:43:40 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21936
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21936
Log:
Keeping up with Metze :-).
Jeremy.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/lib/replace/system/filesys.h
Changeset:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+#ifdef HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
^^ this should be HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H
yes, sorry, it's already fixed:-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-22 19:00:17 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21937
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21937
Log:
Merge in changes from SAMBA_3_0 that should have
been done for 3.0.25 pre-release. Janitor for
libsmbclient maintainer :-(.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-22 18:43:40 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21936
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21936
Log:
Keeping up with Metze :-).
Jeremy.
Hi
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-22 19:14:17 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21938
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21938
Log:
Forgot to commit the ACL change. Thanks Metze.
Jeremy.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/configure.in
Changeset:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-22 02:24:12 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21926
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21926
Log:
Fix missing enum specifier pointed out by
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-03-22 22:00:48 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21941
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21941
Log:
Attempt to fix bug 4460
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbind_nss_irix.c
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-22 22:15:35 + (Thu, 22 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21942
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21942
Log:
Hoist by our own petard :-). Older smbclient binaries
were not able to connect to the rewritten dfs code as
they set the dfs
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:26:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're comfortable, I'm comfortable. :-)
I'm always comfortable :-).
I have high standards for myself... I don't like to release buggy code, and
prefer that the code go nowhere than go somewhere and come back to haunt
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5302
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
timestamp: Fri 2007-03-23
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5303
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
timestamp: Fri 2007-03-23
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5304
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
timestamp: Fri 2007-03-23
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2007-03-22
00:01:49.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2007-03-23 00:00:18.0
+
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
-Build status as of Thu Mar 22 00:00:03 2007
+Build status as of Fri Mar
55 matches
Mail list logo
