On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:25:06PM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
I added nt acl support = yes to the config file and restarted with no
effect. The manpage for smb.conf said yes is the default, so I had been
omitting it, but I suppose it can't hurt. The share is on a UFS volume
on Solaris, I
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:40:36 +0200
Valerio Daelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On 10/15/07, Willy Offermans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Valerio,
Maybe ``grep'' can help you?
Thanks for your suggestion.
We were looking for something like a good patch already
approved by the
Hello Friends,
Actually here is the history of my operation, initially I am having the samba
version samba3.0.23_A0 and leter I am trying to upgrade it to samba3.0.25_A0
without changing the smb.conf, that results so many obsolete entries.
Now I have removed the all the obsolete entries
From: Dale Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If what I described above does not work for you, perhaps this thread
applies?
http://archives.devshed.com/forums/samba-120/problems-installing-printer-driver-1365160.html
That seems to do the trick, thanks. The driver files were read-only, but
after I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pappas, Bill wrote:
tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for
key SJMEMDC15 in tdb /usr/local/samba-3.0.23a/private/secrets.tdb
What is SJMEMDC15? The name of your domain? or DC? Sounds like
you are not running Winbind.
On 10/17/07, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Samba 3.0.25c on OpenSolaris nv72.
wbinfo -u lists domain users as expected.
getent passwd only lists local users.
nsswitch.conf has the following lines:
passwd: files winbind
group: files winbind
My smb.conf
What is SJMEMDC15? The name of your domain? or DC? Sounds like
you are not running Winbind. If not, then running winbindd should
reduce contention on access to the secrets.tdb file.
SJMEMDC is a DC. I am not using winbind. I want AD (via MSSFU) to
establish our UIDs and GIDs so that other
Here you go:
bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
HAVE__ACL
HAVE__FACL
It looks plausible to me, but I'm assuming you know better than I what
it should say. Also, I did just check, and that is the binary that the
init script is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pappas, Bill wrote:
What is SJMEMDC15? The name of your domain? or DC? Sounds like
you are not running Winbind. If not, then running winbindd should
reduce contention on access to the secrets.tdb file.
SJMEMDC is a DC. I am not using
Hi,
I am using samba 3.0.24-6etch4 with ldap as a PDC. This ist the home
part in smb.conf
[homes]
comment = Homedrive
path = /home/%U
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
browseable = No
nt acl support = 1
inherit acls = 0
Hello, all.
I was wondering if anyone could help me with this configuration:
I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
dc=base
+ ou=unit1
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit2
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit3
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
...
Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
dc=base
+ ou=unit1
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit2
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit3
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
...
And I need people from unit1
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:59AM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
Here you go:
bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
HAVE__ACL
HAVE__FACL
It looks plausible to me, but I'm assuming you know better than I what
That indeed looks
2007/10/18, Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
dc=base
+ ou=unit1
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit2
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit3
+ ou=People
+
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:59AM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
Here you go:
bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
HAVE__ACL
HAVE__FACL
It looks plausible to me, but I'm assuming you know better than I what
That indeed looks right.
This might be a need if you have several PDCs (samba domains) running on
one LDAP server. I've had such structure for several years and it works OK.
M.
Fabiano Caixeta Duarte napisaĆ(a):
2007/10/18, Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
I had a LDAP tree
Issue: Vista reads slowly from a samba server. This appears to pop up
periodically here and elsewhere.
My samba.conf file has:
[homes]
...
vfs objects = readahead
As suggested elsewhere.
Writes are approximately 17-18MB/s which is acceptable. Reads are in
the 8MB/s range which is
Yes, each unit has it's own PDC, but each one need to authenticate all
users from the organization.
I think there is no other way than using all users under the same
container, but I'm not a Samba+LDAP specialist, maybe I let something
out on my readings.
Sorry if this message was replicated,
Atrox wrote:
Hmm, actually the machine runs OpenVPN too, so its (bridged) tap device has
its own IP that falls into the same netmask /24. Is it possible that Samba
may get confused about that? Should specifying only the internal interface
(and lo0 maybe) in interfaces help in this case?
I have
Hello,
We have two problems with Win2k SP4 clients accessing our Samba file
server:
1. Sometimes the contents of a folder on a Samba share become outdated until the
folder contents are manually refreshed by pressing F5 in Windows Explorer. From
what I have read, this can be caused by missing or
Trying to join a 3.0.23c pdc with 3.0.26a gives error:
-
./net rpc join -S TESTPDC -Uroot%passwd
[2007/10/18 19:49:35, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_newstyle(304)
error setting trust account password: NT
any errors on windows side when you try to set permissions?
On 10/18/07, Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:59AM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
Here you go:
bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
Ramadevu, Ramkumar escreveu:
Hello Friends,
Actually here is the history of my operation, initially I am having
the samba version samba3.0.23_A0 and leter I am trying to upgrade it
to samba3.0.25_A0 without changing the smb.conf, that results so many
obsolete entries.
Now I have removed
Michael Lueck wrote:
Atrox wrote:
Hmm, actually the machine runs OpenVPN too, so its (bridged) tap device
has
its own IP that falls into the same netmask /24. Is it possible that
Samba
may get confused about that? Should specifying only the internal
interface
(and lo0 maybe) in
make sure that user logged in to windows box is an owner of files .
as i know , only owner can change permissions .
try # chown administrator/DOMAIN /samba/test.txt , after that try
to set permissions on this file from windows .
On 10/18/07, Eric Diven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None when I
Yup. Look at the man page for idmap_ad(8).
Great. I'll take a look.
Are there any plans to make the timeout more forgiving an upcoming
releases? If I jump to the latest stable version, will there be any tdb
fixes that address this issue now?
Thanks,
Bill Pappas - System Integration
bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.
Error = Address already in use
I think that you are trying to run smb multiple times.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello All,
Just thought I'd throw this out. I got Samba Vista home folders to show
up and work correctly finally running as a member server to Windows 2003
AD domain, after lots of wrangling. This is on an old Samba 3.0.10.
Running FC3. If anyone is having probs with this I can post my smb.conf.
revno: 659
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: tridge
timestamp: Thu 2007-10-18 16:27:36 +1000
message:
added some debug lines to help track down a problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: tridge
Date: 2007-10-18 01:37:46 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25689
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25689
Log:
test with a non-zero size file
Hi
Metze,
wouldn't it be better to test with a zero file and with a non-zero one?
If there's a difference we should really test both.
With current NFS v2/v3 servers and clients it will never work with a
zero length file, as the oplock break code gets called on read or
write, and the NFS client
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via b4746009735bf66b2578b884973c505b0363a79d (commit)
from 315215e20e1e470c5077122a2e250ecb3d45ce9b (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
While most nfs clients (solaris,linux and bsd?) are careful and never
try to read beyond the end of file based on the end-of-file field of
the GETATTR calls,
There are some nfs clients that are less careful (all versions of
HPUX and at least old versions of AIX) that always read a full nfs
Author: metze
Date: 2007-10-18 08:34:19 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25695
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25695
Log:
[libreplace] fix the standalone build of libreplace
all configure results which are used in replace.h
or any system/*.h
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via d70ddad2e8fc2f533fb9211223c172c25878254e (commit)
via f694df1919fe98c5efef36c867a2be6527efa6ed (commit)
from 50d5eec508bd5b98b81825b4e20c06f698029fdf (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 50d5eec508bd5b98b81825b4e20c06f698029fdf (commit)
via 1eefa0264bb1a304a30ec4c7c6e2392c627ee6a3 (commit)
from b4746009735bf66b2578b884973c505b0363a79d (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:26:55AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-10-17 08:26:55 + (Wed, 17 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25674
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25674
[...]
I've tested with midl to see how windows handles
Author: gd
Date: 2007-10-18 09:44:25 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25696
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25696
Log:
Fix pipe name for dfs.
Guenther
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/dfs.idl
Changeset:
Modified:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rafal Szczesniak schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:26:55AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-10-17 08:26:55 + (Wed, 17 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25674
WebSVN:
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 2972c97e5e676964585de930601f083c19080735 (commit)
from d70ddad2e8fc2f533fb9211223c172c25878254e (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
Author: kseeger
Date: 2007-10-18 11:55:09 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 1193
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=1193
Log:
Add comment about net rpc|rap file user (implemented now)
Karolin
Modified:
trunk/manpages-3/net.8.xml
Changeset:
Author: obnox
Date: 2007-10-18 12:47:49 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 1194
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=1194
Log:
Add documentation for the net conf commands to the manpage.
Michael
Modified:
trunk/manpages-3/net.8.xml
Author: metze
Date: 2007-10-18 13:27:48 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25697
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25697
Log:
make *clean doesn't work after a svn up when some *.mk files were removed
the error is:
SAMBA_4_0/source make clean
make:
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via ea3173a9457f9095a70d401abfd1af8c913211a0 (commit)
from 2972c97e5e676964585de930601f083c19080735 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
Author: metze
Date: 2007-10-18 19:25:58 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25698
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25698
Log:
ignore some generated files
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/registry/tools/
Author: gd
Date: 2007-10-18 21:23:25 + (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25699
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25699
Log:
Add ForceReplication test.
Guenther
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/frsapi.idl
Author: abartlet
Date: 2007-10-19 05:41:32 + (Fri, 19 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25703
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25703
Log:
Use less entropy by using the pointer value as a process-unique token.
Andrew Bartlett
Modified:
Author: abartlet
Date: 2007-10-19 05:39:08 + (Fri, 19 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25701
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25701
Log:
Clarify comment
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c
Changeset:
Modified:
revno: 662
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: tridge
timestamp: Fri 2007-10-19 12:22:24 +1000
message:
increase release number
modified:
revno: 660
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: tridge
timestamp: Fri 2007-10-19 09:30:55 +1000
message:
remove a incorrectly added file
removed:
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via f35a266b3cbb3e5fa6a86be60f34fe340a3ca71f (commit)
from ea3173a9457f9095a70d401abfd1af8c913211a0 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2007-10-18
00:01:05.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2007-10-19 00:01:03.0
+
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Build status as of Thu Oct 18 00:00:02 2007
+Build status as of Fri Oct
revno: 661
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: tridge
timestamp: Fri 2007-10-19 09:39:07 +1000
message:
merge from ronnie
Author: jra
Date: 2007-10-19 00:40:51 + (Fri, 19 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25700
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25700
Log:
Now BOOL no longer exists in Samba 3.2, use bool instead.
Jeremy.
Modified:
revno: 654
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: s3-ctdb-tridge
timestamp: Fri 2007-10-19 12:22:49 +1000
message:
increase release number
modified:
revno: 653
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: s3-ctdb-tridge
timestamp: Fri 2007-10-19 12:19:09 +1000
message:
allow sync on close to be disabled, using
Author: abartlet
Date: 2007-10-19 05:40:00 + (Fri, 19 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 25702
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=25702
Log:
Clarify comments and make this module more strict on objectclasses.
This is becoming the schema module...
Andrew Bartlett
57 matches
Mail list logo