[Samba] Sharing the \ filesystem - different samba versions

2008-02-09 Thread Michael W Cocke
This may sound stupid, but I'm honestly missing it - I was running Fedora 5, samba version 3.0.24. I just switch to Centos 5, samba version 3.0.23c. I made no changes to my smb.conf. I used to have the / filesystem shared as sys. that no longer works - the 'lowest' on the tree I can share now

[Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread markus neis
Hi there,I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available with redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while doing this: If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes to copy a file of 1GB size. If I set locking = yes it takes about 1

[Samba] samba locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
Hi there, I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available with redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while doing this: If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes to copy a file of 1GB size. If I set locking = yes it takes

Re: [Samba] Is Samba Shadowcopying can be used in Production Environement with more than 20 TB of data

2008-02-09 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2/6/2008, Michael Heydon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: We have something setup here (on a smaller scale) that might be useful. Our main file server rsync's with our backup server every hour (using hardlinks to keep snapshots). Since relatively little data changes between each sync, it is

Re: [Samba] roaming profiles

2008-02-09 Thread Charles Marcus
Adam Williams, on 2/7/2008 2:01 PM, said the following: thats right, everything in c:\documents and settings\username will be put into \\server\profiles\username No, it WILL NOT. The Local Settings folder is NOT included BY DEFAULT with roaming profiles. no need to shout. i learn

[Samba] Samba name resolution (?) over VPN

2008-02-09 Thread Joe Demeny
I have a Win2K Small Business Server which is also a PDC (sbsserver). I have added a FreeBSD box running Samba 3.0.28 as a member server (samba_server). I can mount shares offered by both the sbsserver and samba_server fine when I do it on the local network. However, when I connect through a

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Scott Lovenberg
On Feb 9, 2008 8:49 AM, markus neis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there,I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available with redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while doing this: If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes

[Samba] nmbd dead but pid file exists

2008-02-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On a CentOS 5.1 server samba works perfectly as long as connections exist. If no connections exist nmbd shuts down: service smb status smbd (pid 2970 2934) is running... nmbd dead but pid file exists On this last occasion it had been less than 5 minutes between connections. What could be

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Scott Lovenberg
On Feb 9, 2008 3:01 PM, markus neis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i set oplocks = yes , kernel oplocks = yes and as I said locking = yes, but this slows down everything OK, from what I gather (which very well could be inaccurate), it looks like you might be stuck on a spinlock timeout on a

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
i set oplocks = yes , kernel oplocks = yes and as I said locking = yes, but this slows down everything _ Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can refute what you say ;-) gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused. ___ GRATIS: Movie-FLAT. Jetzt freischalten! http://freemail.web.de/club/maxdome.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Markus Neis wrote: Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can refute what you say ;-) gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused. No offense intended, but Scott's description is not really correct. The only parameter that should

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Scott Lovenberg
Volker Lendecke wrote: On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Markus Neis wrote: Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can refute what you say ;-) gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused. No offense intended, but Scott's description is not really correct.

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
ok, but i heard people say that ctdb isn't for productional use. can you confirm that volker? Is it also a good idea to save the locking information on the gfs filesystem? Bis 50 MB Dateianhänge? Kein Problem!

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:17:02AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote: ok, but i heard people say that ctdb isn't for productional use. can you confirm that volker? Well, it *is* used in production. It's not trivial to set up, but it works. Is it also a good idea to save the locking information on the

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
Ok I understand. People that earn more money than me made this decision ;-) But I wonder why Redhat offers the possibility in their cluster suite to setup samba services on top of gfs. This should be a known problem then. However, as I understand you its not a good idea to use samba with gfs

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 06:07:36PM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: Just to clarify, the locking semantics (regardless of type) do not propagate down to the kernel smb module, but rather pass to the underlying file system (which in turn propagates to its own kernel module)? Thanks, Volker.

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
here's my smb.conf if you would be so nice ... ;-) [global] dos charset = 850 unix charset = CP850 display charset = LOCALE workgroup = FILESRV realm = netbios name = FILESRV netbios aliases = austauschsrv, fachaustsrv, grplwsrv

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:00:07AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote: I put the tdb files out of gfs only some data files are now on gfs, but it's the same behavior. ;-( If it's still slow with posix locking = no, and tdb files out of GFS, then more detailed analysis is necessary. This will be tough

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:51:24AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote: Ok I understand. People that earn more money than me made this decision ;-) But I wonder why Redhat offers the possibility in their cluster suite to setup samba services on top of gfs. This should be a known problem then. However,

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Markus Neis
I put the tdb files out of gfs only some data files are now on gfs, but it's the same behavior. ;-( Bis 50 MB Dateianhänge? Kein Problem! http://www.digitaledienste.web.de/freemail/club/lp/?lp=7 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the

Re: [Samba] locking and gfs

2008-02-09 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:08:04AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: You can perfectly fine use samba on top of gfs, as long as you only share your data from a single node or (more precisely) make sure that every directory is only shared via a single node. Different directories can be shared via

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-681-gf752152

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via f7521525e42d62e96cc6f55fb1b23644a60fc36d (commit) via 94dedaf6ed55b146a0123407137f7ee4cfd41283 (commit) via d19d27f406c0377d98c9fe9da9284dcebd373bb7 (commit) via 9705263a6c58d4ade556d17db2009dbb85291b22 (commit) from

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-682-ged44fd5

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via ed44fd59bfa289bcef82e0650ccda381efb52268 (commit) from f7521525e42d62e96cc6f55fb1b23644a60fc36d (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test - Log -

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-688-gc9c1156

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via c9c115647893478e21134f8c703e0f52e2478882 (commit) via 9a4b9facc869a8f7363932a591437251b44cd7bb (commit) from 5ade1a951685665164037138cb92e5b2db2a8b52 (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test - Log

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-686-g5ade1a9

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via 5ade1a951685665164037138cb92e5b2db2a8b52 (commit) via ea7d389bcc284d2e9eeff79bce5c285269099ad3 (commit) via ee7f54c86d2b467869db8dea33f60e19ed3c742f (commit) via 1868a42108012183aa78fe5d4f524d45f4505a3e (commit) from

svn commit: samba-web r1171 - in trunk: . devel docs/FAQ download team

2008-02-09 Thread jelmer
Author: jelmer Date: 2008-02-09 16:04:59 + (Sat, 09 Feb 2008) New Revision: 1171 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1171 Log: Update various bits on the website to refer to Git. Patch by Andrew Kroeger. Modified: trunk/ trunk/devel/TODO.html

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-689-g3c64fc7

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via 3c64fc7dc631a79154957e45f8961e2ee519743f (commit) from c9c115647893478e21134f8c703e0f52e2478882 (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test - Log -

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-695-g073ed0d

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via 073ed0dd1cc8fae9eb4a2f7ff6763124917c56e8 (commit) via 13a7dfb90066a52e0d90dbed5fe2c82c4af6092c (commit) via 68f13d87eb034fdbc712169f2d1b1a0475751ec5 (commit) via dad809030478a85ac13a73bce9c07314792f01c2 (commit) via

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-697-ge4d7cd8

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via e4d7cd8ba77aa05c11dad457c3f2c2c6252c5966 (commit) via 501259ff31641bf52e337b597881d1fedc6b2a63 (commit) from 073ed0dd1cc8fae9eb4a2f7ff6763124917c56e8 (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test - Log

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated - release-4-0-0alpha2-698-g80dbf04

2008-02-09 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated via 80dbf04266d15833f7eb18704cfece1f95965e83 (commit) from e4d7cd8ba77aa05c11dad457c3f2c2c6252c5966 (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test - Log -

[SCM] CTDB repository - branch master updated - ca266a989ba1c6fcac48b1739e7cff7766481df7

2008-02-09 Thread Ronnie Sahlberg
The branch, master has been updated via ca266a989ba1c6fcac48b1739e7cff7766481df7 (commit) from e7b1349bf8784c151c2651edd99b3f40ebcece1f (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

Build status as of Sun Feb 10 00:00:01 2008

2008-02-09 Thread build
URL: http://build.samba.org/ --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2008-02-09 00:00:29.0 + +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2008-02-10 00:00:40.0 + @@ -1,22 +1,22 @@ -Build status as of Sat Feb 9 00:00:02 2008 +Build status as of Sun Feb