On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:30:54PM -0700, Jack Lauman wrote:
I'm trying to get Lacerte 2007 Tax Accounting software working on a
Samba v3.0.28a based server. When one user is logged in it works fine.
When two or more users are accessing the database files it slows to a
crawl.
But it still
Jack Lauman wrote:
snip
I compared the open files with one computer in Lacerte vs. two
computers in Lacerte and noticed one thing peculiar: when one computer
is using Lacerte, all files are opened with exclusive+batch oplocks
including Data1i07.dbf, however when 2 computers are running Lacerte,
sharif islam wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Michael Heydon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
snip
Or you can use the above force group option to access the files as a group
that does have access.
Well, the problem is, each folder (such as /www/share1, /www/share2)
already
Hi,
I'm new here and I have a doubt...
I'm work with windows 2003 server and now i would change to llnux. My doubt
regards the share of my server: to authenticate my users what is better:
samba tdb or ldap? For us is not necessary an active directory, domain,
ecc... I need only a file server and I
always ldap.
Esteban Torres Rodríguez
ÁREA DE SOPORTE TÉCNICO - Administración de Servidores
Subdirección de Sistemas Informáticos
Empresa Pública Desarrollo Agrario y Pesquero,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rosilene Pagani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15/5/2008 09:23
Hi,
I'm new here and I have a
Hello Gilles,
In your mail from May 12, 2008 (05:47:58) can be read:
G On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:09:07 +0200, Marcin Kucharczyk
G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When system (FreeBSD) is closed unexpectedly tdb files are corrupted.
After boot samba tries to start, but because of corrupted tdb files
it is
Michael Heydon wrote:
Jack Lauman wrote:
snip
I compared the open files with one computer in Lacerte vs. two
computers in Lacerte and noticed one thing peculiar: when one computer
is using Lacerte, all files are opened with exclusive+batch oplocks
including Data1i07.dbf, however when 2
On 5/14/2008, Michael Heydon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Would it be possible to disable USB storage devices
I sure would like to find a *reliable* way to disable ONLY USB STORAGE
devices, but allow things like keyboards and mice...
Anyone?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my
server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap?
For us is not necessary an active
On 5/15/2008 8:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you disable the USB mass storage service in the windows registry.
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\USBSTOR]
Type=dword:0001
Start=dword:0003--- Alter me to 1 I
I configured Samba with AD through winbind with *. tdb, but I want to
configure samba directly against ldap DP or need to mount a openldap.
Is it possible?
I want to remove *. tdb.
Directly RedHat support:
Correcting the permissions on such files and directories can be a very
difficult task,
you disable the USB mass storage service in the windows registry.
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\USBSTOR]
Type=dword:0001
Start=dword:0003--- Alter me to 1 I think
ErrorControl=dword:0001
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my
server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap?
For us is
Hi,
I hope someone might understand the problem I am seeing. I will simplify the
setup that I have which reproduces the problem:
1) Computer 1 is running Server 2003 with 2 NICS. One is a WAN link with IP
address 192.168.1.12. It has a private link with IP 10.0.0.12.
2) Computer 2 is running
Hello All,
I´ve a customer with a problem. They need to apply some policy's in your
Samba LDAP (SMBLDAPTOOLS) passwords, like this:
- Passwords Expiration
- Minimum lenght
- History
- Quality of Password
- Block after 3 incorrect logon attempts
Is it possible to do it with the Default Samba
I´ve a customer with a problem. They need to apply some policy's in your
Samba LDAP (SMBLDAPTOOLS) passwords, like this:
- Passwords Expiration
Yes
- Minimum lenght
Yes
- History
Yes
- Quality of Password
No (at least without hackery)
- Block after 3 incorrect logon attempts
Yes
For some reason the excel file was stripped in my last post. (See
below). We would appreciate any help we can get on this. Intuit tried
this on their test server and we don't know whats causing the files to
open without oplocks when a second user tries to access the database.
Thanks,
Jack
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Jack Lauman wrote:
For some reason the excel file was stripped in my last post. (See
below). We would appreciate any help we can get on this. Intuit tried
this on their test server and we don't know whats causing the files to
open without oplocks
Please keep all traffic on the list.
Where Can I get pbedit (Download) ?
pdbedit is part of the Samba packages.
I read some docs about pbedit, Is it possible to integrate pbedit with
SMBLDAPTOOLS ?
I know nothing about smbldaptools; I don't use them at any of my sites.
--
The first part of any SID is the domain portion. It should be pretty
constant throughout your domain as I understand things. When dealing
with users and groups, the bit after the last dash is the RID or
relative ID and it must be unique within the domain. Really really
unique! If samba created
The [homes] share is configured similarly to the [home] share, though
one would mount it different:
\\fileserver.ucsc.edu\home for the [home] share
\\fileserver.ucsc.edu\wmodes for the [homes] share
and for users who have the problem, they have the SID problem in
mounting both shares.
On
Hello again,
Just an update to see if this might help anyone help me, I did upgrade
the Debian machine to the newest Samba that it could handle, 3.0.24, but
alas I still get the error:
Fetching DOMAIN database
Failed to fetch domain database: NT code 0x1c010002
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bob Bregant
Is it possible to restrict access to specific shares by IP? The Hosts Allow
directive is a global one, but is there
something similar to be more restrictive for admin type shares?
Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:51:12PM +0200, Philip Kloppers wrote:
Is it possible to restrict access to specific shares by IP? The Hosts Allow
directive is a global one, but is there
something similar to be more restrictive for admin type shares?
Shares can have ACLs, which restricts by user,
Thanks. I was hoping for some sort of .htaccess to be able to allow or deny
unauthenticated users (XP Home clients -
cannot join the domain) based on their IP.
Would be a nice addition...
Philip
On 2008-05-15 Jeremy Allison wrote:
Shares can have ACLs, which restricts by user, but not by IP
hope I'm in the right place, I trying to join a samba server to Active
Directory.
Samba server FreeBSD 6.2
the Active Directory machine is running Windows 2008 Server
When I execute net ads join -U Administrator I get the following error
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.8: Undefined
Hi all,
I set up a Samba server (version 3.0.24) names Lamp on a Debian Etch
distribution. It provides a guest (guest ok = yes, guest only = yes,
security = SHARE) access to a share directory, which works fine.
Indeed, I can access \\lamp\share from a Windows machine (named
Ginger) without
Charles Marcus wrote:
I sure would like to find a *reliable* way to disable ONLY USB STORAGE
devices, but allow things like keyboards and mice...
What have you tried that is unreliable? There are alot of write ups on
various ways of disabling the usbstor driver, I haven't tried them
myself
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via 3ce33843d767aad1f01fab20ba4c2bb781f8c21a (commit)
via 7eebe088f99d401a0f5e42e1ce593bb2ea74f245 (commit)
via c32448b49036a50fc0f6d2b0a2de641144fc049f (commit)
via 5beb4e67b24c31ba8294861d71023dff78d96042 (commit)
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via e90a4ce3c24ab2a33e34da5a9052a3b3ec4db962 (commit)
from 95339c0c1ecc49049f1fc176f72a1dcac639e06d (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via 2d3f4897076663505aec23eb3ffaa1ae54cd39a5 (commit)
from 3ce33843d767aad1f01fab20ba4c2bb781f8c21a (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-stable
- Log
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via 73c05bb8b820c42c5fa820d1cdf6591feb19a244 (commit)
via 2e0c41c90ba8e0d9cc857b2f07adb7ddf3cb5f31 (commit)
from 2d3f4897076663505aec23eb3ffaa1ae54cd39a5 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-stable
- Log
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via e02673dc0f59b1d6b0ff83ba23fcaa1373ca7a6f (commit)
via bbad2b9758cff53679188ff5e4fc47db3cc51d65 (commit)
from 6d445c134d4d78f8261c998a5a83feaafb01bbca (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via 7191071943868d668fae93403e7f86c719afae89 (commit)
from 73c05bb8b820c42c5fa820d1cdf6591feb19a244 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-stable
- Log
The branch, v3-0-test has been updated
via 4e6612320f1c6d44e98571485f49d647a776edb2 (commit)
from 9727d87e7c8748fecf7df5664320507711a7d081 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 954d0998c2c00140addb6ba3845e80ed91e4effc (commit)
via e305368538eaa72e3008a5517db3708936924297 (commit)
via 255e509474cae92802e90613ccaddb6627ee77cd (commit)
via 0388b2f0cc4d14b005c5b42f2c17ddcbc8bef12a (commit)
from
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 5b5b29302b53c31256dfa2fdefead458cb14c560 (commit)
via 9ee5ddb96360987675963d629f98051bf34e3031 (commit)
via 5dedde7a5b01d47947a8ff49a57e729fe5bfc817 (commit)
via b7e8a3f1caf54145d750209f2e14b5b54c61769b (commit)
via
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via db933ae1a9877b3485506fc8f0ecae2f2bd8a41f (commit)
from 5b5b29302b53c31256dfa2fdefead458cb14c560 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 68029894f80804c9f31fc90ed0c1b58f75812c3d (commit)
from 2c292039a0139dcf5bb2bd964eb6f8902d094c50 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=sahlberg/ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 9aa09aee618fa71787c5d0e7c885e83f4d82236c (commit)
from 68029894f80804c9f31fc90ed0c1b58f75812c3d (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=sahlberg/ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2008-05-15
00:00:33.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2008-05-16 00:00:28.0
+
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Build status as of Thu May 15 00:00:02 2008
+Build status as of Fri May
The branch, master has been updated
via f0b98a32be2043a465d4d0ab42e6c2407d9d60f2 (commit)
from 9aa09aee618fa71787c5d0e7c885e83f4d82236c (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=sahlberg/ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via f8883107499ca48db9b0e63718d1d8e384535833 (commit)
via 7de8666c722be5dce8520f34a0823eb8767ab5d5 (commit)
via 9e7466466d216f99582b03431d5c39875c574470 (commit)
via 161e7c32caf5d4fee23e1f9c5e8ea871ad2aa57e (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via d32b16a4e5ecc31563c6f2767e7d483f3d980284 (commit)
from f0b98a32be2043a465d4d0ab42e6c2407d9d60f2 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=sahlberg/ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
44 matches
Mail list logo
