Hi there,
Samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5
Centos 5.3
For some time now I have been using the following on my shares:
valid users = @group
For some reason, my samba just up and crapped out over the weekend...
When trying to mount the drive (Win XP), it just keeps asking for the
credentials.
When
DNK wrote:
Why would this happen?
No idea...
Is there any disadvantage or security concern by using the users =
@group style?
Yes, the users option does something completely different to the valid
users option. While there may be some similarities in the end result,
they are not the same.
Good morning.
I'm having some problems with one thread of samba, taking excessive CPU
usage.
This is one single thread, that i can kill with 'kill -9 pid', and the
server will keep other connections.
This thread will severely slow down the server, and clients notify me
within minutes of this
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:35:20AM +0200, Kasper Sacharias Eenberg wrote:
I'm having some problems with one thread of samba, taking excessive CPU
usage.
Can you do an strace on those servers? If they are still
serving syscalls and signals, please send a
smbcontrol pid debug 10
and send the
I have set up strace on both servers, and i will be waiting for the
problem to happen again.
Unfortunately it might a a while.
With regards,
Kasper Eenberg
HOVMARK DATA
Ravnevej 13
dk-6705 Esbjerg Ø
tlf: +45 76 12 59
Hi samba lists !!
I’m found error message Windows XP
“The network name cannot be found
When I try to connect to smb server that is mapped e:
1. I was downloading very large file 40GByte with torrent during 5
hours.
2. This error occurred!
3. But web server and
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:36:12PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
ppolicy overlay?
As we are working more actively with bugzilla again now, can
you
Miguel Medalha wrote:
Based on your smb.conf, you must have the following entries in
/etc/ldap.conf
nss_base_passwdou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_shadowou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_group
Below is a log file of a panic that occurs on two different sites
running Debian Stable Samba 3.2.5. The problem is triggered by Sophos
Control Centre doing it's hourly check for updates, and as SCC is
running on a user's PC in both cases causes problems for the user. I've
tried everything
Hi fellows. I'm new to the list and hope I'll have a nice time here.
one of my servers running samba+ldap is not working properly.
the setup is:
Debian 5
fileserver:/etc/samba#smbd --version
Version 3.0.24
fileserver:/etc/samba# slapd -V
@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.30 (Oct 5 2008
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Andrew Porter wrote:
Below is a log file of a panic that occurs on two different sites
running Debian Stable Samba 3.2.5. The problem is triggered by Sophos
Control Centre doing it's hourly check for updates, and as SCC is
running on a user's PC in
I have a share on a disk with 120G free. But for some reason, all my CIFS
clients report only 14.4G empty. Depending on what I'm trying to do with
the share, the client may happily ignore the supposed free space limitation,
but some programs actually give me a warning and refuse to work, Error,
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:36:12PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
ppolicy overlay?
As we are working more actively with bugzilla
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
No problem. To the 3.4 branch or the 4.0? Also, as I stated before,
I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.
3.4. please.
Volker
pgpU2G7uFn8Br.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
2009/5/19 주원배 onesho...@lge.com:
Hi samba lists !!
I’m found error message Windows XP
“The network name cannot be found
The XP client does not know the ip address of the samba server because
for some reason whatever method you are using for name to ipaddress
resolution temporarily
Hello Good Peopple,
I had install a samba PDC server with openldap backend. It's working
but I have a lot messages at log.
What I'm doing wrong? ( Here http://pastebin.ca/1427490 , I put my smb.conf)
May 19 11:23:46 thome smbd[57069]: [2009/05/19 11:23:46, 0]
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Send more logs -- at least 1000 lines before that event
please. bzip2 should nicely compress that.
Attached
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
No problem. To the 3.4 branch or the 4.0? Also, as I stated before,
I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.
3.4. please.
Volker
Here ya go. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns:
I have a very strange problem and I'm doomed. In a samba-domain with XP-clients
certain users cannot logon to some computers.
The user tries to logon but *immediately* gets the message you cant get logged
on. please check username and domain and retype your password (translated from
german)
On 18-May-09, at 11:48 PM, Michael Heydon wrote:
DNK wrote:
Why would this happen?
No idea...
Is there any disadvantage or security concern by using the users =
@group style?
Yes, the users option does something completely different to the
valid users option. While there may be some
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:24 -0500, Mike Eggleston wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009, simo might have said:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:17 -0500, Mike Eggleston wrote:
Morning,
Well I ordered a Windows Server 2008 Standard for a need around here and
after just spending an hour with Dell
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:19:34PM +0100, peter pilsl wrote:
A more detailed log at Loglevel=15 can be viewed at :
http://www.goldfisch.at/temp/smb.log.txt (~150kB)
I never understand why people cut log files. There is NO
indication whatsoever about any failure, but a lot of
indication that
From: rhy...@hotmail.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: language charset problem！
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 02:10:45 +
dear all， I port samba 3.0.0 to board ,and it is almost ok. but there still
some problem about file display can't be resolved. I use charset C
1 chinese
after many tries and upgrading my samba to 3.2.5, the sharing is
working... kind of.
now everyone can access their exclusive folders on the server, also can
acess the public folder (anyone can access this folder without
authentication). when people try to access folders that they should not
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
should be
nss_base_hostsou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
No, it shouldn't. From the point of view of a Windows domain, computers
are users too. The Samba manual even makes a joke about that, saying
that computers are
Did you install libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap? You need those.
Also, in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
passwd: files ldap
shadow: files ldap
group: files ldap
I found that Samba works better with the ldpasam:trusted = yes
parameter. In this case, your LDAP database MUST contain the entire
POSIX account
If I try to connect with a user that exist in both the LDAP and etc/passwd
files I cannot get it to authenticate (error user is invalid or bad
password) but I don't get any log in the samba files
It means that the error precedes Samba.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
Miguel Medalha wrote:
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
should be nss_base_hostsou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
No, it shouldn't. From the point of view of a Windows domain,
computers are users too. The Samba manual even makes a joke about
that, saying
dogb...@infinito.it wrote:
Miguel Medalha wrote:
Based on your smb.conf, you must have the following entries in
/etc/ldap.conf
nss_base_passwdou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_shadowou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
or are you saying nss_base_hosts
ou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one is wrong?
I don't know about NFS, but from the point of view of a Samba PDC the
above is wrong. Computers are also domain users and as such they must be
referred to the nss_base_passwd directive.
Quoting from
Miguel Medalha wrote:
or are you saying nss_base_hosts
ou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one is wrong?
I don't know about NFS, but from the point of view of a Samba PDC the
above is wrong. Computers are also domain users and as such they must
be referred to the nss_base_passwd
Folks,
I have a new build of samba 3.3.0 ( stand alone file server )
which is configured to find all user data in an ldap directory, eg
passdb backend = ldapsam. After testing I have confirmed that it all
seems to work as it should with a test set of users.
Now I need to figure out the
John Goubeaux wrote:
Folks,
I have a new build of samba 3.3.0 ( stand alone file server ) which is
configured to find all user data in an ldap directory, eg passdb backend
= ldapsam. After testing I have confirmed that it all seems to work as
it should with a test set of users.
Now I
John,
You can migrate all your /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group entries to
LDAP using the PADL Migration Tools. See:
http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html
After the UNIX system accounts have been migrated to LDAP, just execute:
pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e ldapsam
pdbedit
Am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 schrieb Volker Lendecke:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:26:25PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
From your description, it seems that there is a lot going on.
Unfortunately, I don't personally know nearly enough about the OS/2
implementation of SMB. I know that
John Goubeaux wrote:
John,
You can migrate all your /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group entries to
LDAP using the PADL Migration Tools. See:
http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html
After the UNIX system accounts have been migrated to LDAP, just execute:
pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e
Hi fellows
I have question about samba performance with multi-thread and multi core
cpu.
What can we do for samba performance with multi-thread and multi core ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
I have question about samba performance with multi-thread and multi core
cpu.
What can we do for samba performance with multi-thread and multi core ?
Each connected user gets their own process and thus threads. The
system will balance the threads over the cpus.
John
--
To unsubscribe from
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 43bab13d00fa073acf709ac9a66cb2782694811b (commit)
via c578c66569eed3ae19b42c9787399eb70b935e0a (commit)
via 59ee131464636d3363bc7ee398ba6390a6333558 (commit)
via 853bbc0d3920654aa7401fa5d6fcba7ff86e1a21 (commit)
from
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 0da133101ab149b074ab369d819fc48b7c95bf71 (commit)
via 339b99e31577d8a522711f84bc7d94e88c75d334 (commit)
via 41f9e61d7c8c106a98792e9009bbecf5edfcebe9 (commit)
via 1f05472b9a27861f8e4b9b60410890b920f9d359 (commit)
from
The branch, master has been updated
via f741b90ee8f74077871a0b5d1df55c0dd34a313f (commit)
from 1718e803dc9269f8ba0db4260cc3b8a000da248a (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 1653bbf50b02e4f4dc2f01c5dab32c1cc4894582 (commit)
from 0da133101ab149b074ab369d819fc48b7c95bf71 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 77819597f33d85e67257b73e2e82f2ba123ebf25 (commit)
from f741b90ee8f74077871a0b5d1df55c0dd34a313f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via bb454b5fd95185a1456ea120b3a7c56f4a4f1c78 (commit)
from 77819597f33d85e67257b73e2e82f2ba123ebf25 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 05870b7ee73d64cb30e56f14f37828a0c9b7e9ec (commit)
via 3e1b6487e76232756b854fb28a9d28717ae7d1d3 (commit)
from bb454b5fd95185a1456ea120b3a7c56f4a4f1c78 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via ae386415b6fd15081f3b94faec917dafdeee1f93 (commit)
via 15424162ca2f8e6627f179bc704cf4fb4372e399 (commit)
via f1c093c89f3880108dabeb823860105b251db283 (commit)
from 05870b7ee73d64cb30e56f14f37828a0c9b7e9ec (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via cf9636ea99bb5063a8c7d771c1e29f684b4b753a (commit)
from ae386415b6fd15081f3b94faec917dafdeee1f93 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via f9d00fb58e8e9fed24751ad26dbdbc394f30290e (commit)
from cf9636ea99bb5063a8c7d771c1e29f684b4b753a (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via f8da7f5d744a87b3b7504ec4c509f52c0b4cbe44 (commit)
from f9d00fb58e8e9fed24751ad26dbdbc394f30290e (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 1a219740537319c4369a10572c46949de566ce49 (commit)
from d3bb598e656c22955dcb2f34dabcdc4946b61725 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via ac65ae9b1d0bba2420847dae48f5b07ed072b030 (commit)
from f8da7f5d744a87b3b7504ec4c509f52c0b4cbe44 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2009-05-19
00:01:09.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2009-05-20 00:00:44.0
+
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-Build status as of Tue May 19 00:00:02 2009
+Build status as of Wed May
52 matches
Mail list logo
