Re: [Samba] Samba performance

2011-06-02 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:46:51PM -0700, Juan Pablo wrote: Hi Volker, I've removed the SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 and the 3 other setting, reloaded samba and repeated the tests but still getting the same results for the local tests and also from Windows. I am getting the

Re: [Samba] Single sign on nivana

2011-06-02 Thread Dermot
Given that I have currently have 6 member servers, I think that amount of ldap replication would be over-kill. I was considering one ldap slave. I will consult the Docs that Louis pointed me to and look at the winbind config. Thanks, Dp. On 1 June 2011 19:04, Dale Schroeder

Re: [Samba] Single sign on nivana

2011-06-02 Thread John Drescher
Given that I have currently have 6 member servers, I think that amount of ldap replication would be over-kill. I was considering one ldap slave. I will consult the Docs that Louis pointed me to and look at the winbind config. You do not have to make every server an ldap server. John -- To

Re: [Samba] Samba serving sshfs shares: can't delete files

2011-06-02 Thread TLoD,Snake
On 06/02/2011 03:58 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:02:03PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote: On 05/31/2011 10:26 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:43:16PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote: Hello! I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All works just fine

Re: [Samba] Samba serving sshfs shares: can't delete files

2011-06-02 Thread TLoD,Snake
On 06/02/2011 02:23 PM, TLoD,Snake wrote: On 06/02/2011 03:58 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:02:03PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote: On 05/31/2011 10:26 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:43:16PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote: Hello! I have samba share on my

Re: [Samba] Unable to change owner of the file through smbcacls

2011-06-02 Thread Katariya Rahul
I am able to change owner from User1 to Administrator at Domain Controller/active-directory machine. And after that from linux box, using smbcacls -C DOMAIN\\User1 .. command I am able to change owner from Administrator --gt; User1. But changing owner from User1 to Administrator using

Re: [Samba] Samba performance

2011-06-02 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/25/2011 10:02 PM, Juan Pablo wrote: OS access: Simultaneous read (4 processes): 118 MByte/s average Samba local access: Simultaneous read (4 processes): 102 MByte/s average Samba server from Windows 7: Simultaneous read (4 terminals): 70 MByte/s average The first two

Re: [Samba] Samba performance

2011-06-02 Thread Juan Pablo
Thanks a lot for the advice. It will run these tests and try to find meaningfull information from them. I will post back results. Thanks Juan Pablo From: Volker Lendecke volker.lende...@sernet.de To: Juan Pablo jhur...@yahoo.com Cc: Jeremy Allison

Re: [Samba] winbind issue with Windows 2008 R2 - domain trusts

2011-06-02 Thread Robert Freeman-Day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/01/2011 04:24 PM, Terry wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Terry td3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a problem that just propped up after our windows admin did some work. �He introduced some new domain controllers and upgraded the

[Samba] Samba vs Linux file permissions

2011-06-02 Thread John Maher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I cannot find anything in the documentation or mailing list that addresses this oddity. I've installed Samba Version 3.4.7 on Ubuntu Server 10.04, and I'm utterly confused by samba's behavior regarding permissions. Users on the server have

Re: [Samba] Samba serving sshfs shares: can't delete files

2011-06-02 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:33:21PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote: error packet at smbd/reply.c(2637) cmd=6 (SMBunlink) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Also I think I have to say that all files on remote server are owned by remote server's 'nobody'. As I saw in logfile samba tries to locate such a

Re: [Samba] Samba performance

2011-06-02 Thread Juan Pablo
Hi Stan, Thanks for your feedback and suggestions! The disk subsystem is composed by: - 8 WD2002FAEX SATA 2TB hard drives (7200 RPM, 64MB cache, 4.2 ms avg latency) - 1 Intel RAID controller RS2BL080 with 512 MB configured with 1 virtual drive 12.7 TB (hardware RAID 5 with 1 MB stripe size,

Re: [Samba] Samba performance

2011-06-02 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 6/2/2011 2:24 PM, Juan Pablo wrote: Hi Stan, Thanks for your feedback and suggestions! You're welcome. Let's hope they're beneficial. The disk subsystem is composed by: - 8 WD2002FAEX SATA 2TB hard drives (7200 RPM, 64MB cache, 4.2 ms avg latency) - 1 Intel RAID controller RS2BL080

Re: [Samba] Samba vs Linux file permissions

2011-06-02 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting John Maher (j...@chem.umass.edu): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I cannot find anything in the documentation or mailing list that addresses this oddity. I've installed Samba Version 3.4.7 on Ubuntu Server 10.04, and I'm utterly confused by samba's

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2011-06-02 Thread Rusty Russell
The branch, master has been updated via 43ab5aa lib/tdb/python/tests/simple.py: don't assume TDB ordering. via 2f67fae samba3sam.py: don't assume order of ldb results. from e98fb2f Remove another PATH_MAX. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-6-test updated

2011-06-02 Thread Karolin Seeger
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated via d6b991a s3-docs: Fix version. from c5b7912 s3-winbind: BUG 8166 - Don't lockout users when offline. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test - Log -

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-6-test updated

2011-06-02 Thread Karolin Seeger
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated via 06a02e2 Split the ACE flag mapping between nfs4 and Windows into two separate functions rather than trying to do it inline. Allows us to carefully control what flags are mapped to what in one place. Modification to bug #8191 - vfs_gpfs dosn't

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-6-test updated

2011-06-02 Thread Karolin Seeger
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated via 6aeb139 struct make struct shadow_copy_data its own talloc context (cherry picked from commit d77854fbb22bc9237cea14aae1179bbfe3bd0998) via 0b78d42 s3: Remove SHADOW_COPY_DATA typedef (cherry picked from commit