Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Daniel Müller
Hi, what about the samba running on your NAS. I did a lot of NAS hacking pointing a running samba/winbind config of the vendor to my nt-style samba/ldap domain . But if you do so be aware you are loosing your support :-). So if you can change the samba on your NAS you are up and running.

[Samba] [Announce] CTDB 2.3 available for download

2013-07-11 Thread Amitay Isaacs
Changes in CTDB 2.3 === User-visible changes * 2 new configuration variables for 60.nfs eventscript: - CTDB_MONITOR_NFS_THREAD_COUNT - CTDB_NFS_DUMP_STUCK_THREADS See ctdb.sysconfig for details. * Removed DeadlockTimeout tunable. To enable debug of

[Samba] Samba4 KCC

2013-07-11 Thread Kristofer
Is the KCC in Samba4 set up to honor site links? I set up a few site links between sites (hub-spoke model), but Samba still appears to be replicating everything everywhere from each domain controller. Am I missing something? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Chris Weiss
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote: but not all NASs do. there are several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there. Sure, but non available to buy as a software-only product to my knowledge. They all come with hardware attached :-). right, *I* can't

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Chris Weiss
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:03 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: Hi Cris, Hi there, Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate users using a Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA server? not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC This was not my

[Samba] Windows 7 Registry Tweaks with Samba4

2013-07-11 Thread Chris Hayes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I notice that there are a few registry updates required for Windows 7 when using Samba as a AD DC (according to the Samba wiki). However I've been able to join a Windows 7 workstation to my Samba4 domain without using any registry tweaks; am I

Re: [Samba] Removed params 'force security mode' etc. What to use instead?

2013-07-11 Thread Brian H. Nelson
I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At least question 1? Thanks, Brian On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote: I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the removal of the following config parameters: security mask force security

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Bob Bob
Hi Fernando I have a site that runs 2 trusted domain PDC's across a OpenVPN link. At one end there is a (older) Buffalo Terrastation NAS. The NAS quite happily authenticates etc both sets of domain users. It has the option of Workgroup, NT Domain or AD. I use NT Domain. The PDC's run on Debian

Re: [Samba] Windows 7 Registry Tweaks with Samba4

2013-07-11 Thread Chris Hayes
I have been informed that this is indeed something that would only have been required when using Samba 3, or specifically, when using an NT-style domain. Furthermore I was misunderstanding the term 'PDC' when I submitted this question, as I have been informed that an AD-style domain controller is

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi, Hi there, Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate users using a Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA server? not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC This was not my question. I'm ok running samba 3 DCs. :-) oh but it was! PDC means NT4 style,

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Bob, I have a site that runs 2 trusted domain PDC's across a OpenVPN link. At one end there is a (older) Buffalo Terrastation NAS. The NAS quite happily authenticates etc both sets of domain users. It has the option of Workgroup, NT Domain or AD. I use NT Domain. The PDC's run on Debian

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:01:20AM -0500, Chris Weiss wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote: but not all NASs do. there are several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there. Sure, but non available to buy as a software-only product to my

Re: [Samba] Removed params 'force security mode' etc. What to use instead?

2013-07-11 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote: I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At least question 1? Thanks, Brian On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote: I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi, No, they all write their own these days. None available to license as far as I'm aware. Most times the proprietary NAS software is simply a web interface over a standard Linux/FreeBSD OS using Samba. If you know Samba and Linux, the web interface may be a hurdle, not allowing access to

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
On 07/11/13 11:50, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:01:20AM -0500, Chris Weiss wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote: but not all NASs do. there are several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there. Sure, but non available to buy

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Hoover, Tony
I've had experience with a Western Digital MyBook Live DUO, and it does NOT support any type of network authentication. Users must be created and deleted on that device. --- CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: Pseudo-legal disclaimers do not buy you or your employer any legal recourse for leaked

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi, what about the samba running on your NAS. I did a lot of NAS hacking pointing a running samba/winbind config of the vendor to my nt-style samba/ldap domain . But if you do so be aware you are loosing your support :-). So if you can change the samba on your NAS you are up and running. I

[Samba] What great things can a non-windows user do with Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Steve Litt
Hi all, I ask this question about once a decade. I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I can do with Samba, even though I have no Windows computers? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human

Re: [Samba] What great things can a non-windows user do with Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Chris Weiss
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: Hi all, I ask this question about once a decade. I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I can do with Samba, even though I have no Windows computers? Yes! I've found samba and

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Tony, RE: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba I've had experience with a Western Digital MyBook Live DUO, and it does NOT support any type of network authentication. Users must be created and deleted on that device. Thanks. May good for home use, but not for my employee. Anyway a vendor

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
On 07/11/13 12:29, Fernando Lozano wrote: Hi, what about the samba running on your NAS. I did a lot of NAS hacking pointing a running samba/winbind config of the vendor to my nt-style samba/ldap domain . But if you do so be aware you are loosing your support :-). So if you can change the

Re: [Samba] What great things can a non-windows user do with Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Steve, I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I can do with Samba, even though I have no Windows computers? I'd use Samba only to support Windows users. Samba provides three things: 1. File Services 2. Print Services 3. Network Logons As you are a Unix-only

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Gaiseric, It seems common that vendors (esp the sales guys) assume you are running Windows 200x and AD.I think the logic is that none of our customers use linux so we won't support it. It becomes self-fulfilling when anyone wanting something besides the basic Windows AD support

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Scott Lovenberg
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Fernando Lozano ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: But you know, everyone buys NASes today, it's getting harder to explaing a common PC would be better. Here a server box with a RAID controller and a hot-swappable disk bays is way more expensive than an iomega NAS

Re: [Samba] SUSE Linix 11.2 LDAP to AD

2013-07-11 Thread David Disseldorp
[Removing from the Samba developer ML, this belongs on the user list] On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:59:24 + Pavetto, David david.pave...@hp.com wrote: I did use the Yast to set this up and yes we are using winbind, since I did use yast to set this up initially, so is there anything I need to do

Re: [Samba] What great things can a non-windows user do with Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:52:49 -0400 Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: Hi all, I ask this question about once a decade. I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I can do with Samba, even though I have no Windows computers? Not really. Samba is just

Re: [Samba] samba Digest, Vol 127, Issue 11

2013-07-11 Thread luis aravena
Estimados, Estoy fuera de la oficina. Ante cualquier requerimiento favor generar el ticket respectivo o comunicarse con roberto.var...@pyaing.cl , freddy.arev...@pyaing.cl o frederick.esco...@pyaing.cl atte Luis Aravena -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the

[Samba] oLschema2ldif segfault

2013-07-11 Thread Bo Kersey
I'm seeing a oLschema2ldif segfault when it comes across attributetypes with syntax '1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.5' that is a BINARY attribute. Is this by design? Can I store binary attributes in samba4 ldap? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the

[Samba] [Announce] Samba 4.1.0rc1 Available for Download

2013-07-11 Thread Karolin Seeger
Release Announcements = This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.1. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.1

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 11/07/13 18:43, En/na Fernando Lozano ha escrit: Hi Tony, RE: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba I've had experience with a Western Digital MyBook Live DUO, and it does NOT support any type of network authentication. Users must be created and deleted on that device. Thanks. May good for

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
If you use raid you should either use a true hardware raid (e.g from LSI or Adaptec) or true software raid. The firmware raid (aka fake raid) included on some motherboards is just asking for trouble.For the price of the true hardware raid card you might as well stick with software raid.

[Samba] does winbind have an upper limit of 1410065407 for UID numbers?

2013-07-11 Thread Joshua McClintock
Hello, I'm seem to be hitting an upper limit on the range in winbind for idmap or I have something configured incorrectly... My uidNumber in AD is 1951526546, which the log message show it retrieved correctly, however, the log message shows the upper limit is 1410065407 even though it's

Re: [Samba] samba4 pdc: Import sudoers active directory schema to ldb

2013-07-11 Thread george Nopicture
Any updates on this? I am thinking this schema is lacking the sudoers base cn like in openldap we have ou=SUDOERS,cn=... From: mad-proffes...@hotmail.com To: samba@lists.samba.org CC: samba-techni...@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] samba4 pdc: Import sudoers active directory schema to ldb

Re: [Samba] What great things can a non-windows user do with Samba

2013-07-11 Thread steve
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:46 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: At Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:52:49 -0400 Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: Hi all, I ask this question about once a decade. I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I can do with Samba,

Re: [Samba] [Announce] Samba 4.1.0rc1 Available for Download

2013-07-11 Thread steve
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 20:31 +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote: Release Announcements = This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.1. Hi A bit confused about this: From git://git.samba.org/samba f387d9a..940395d master - origin/master 5c488cf..ae2e0a6

Re: [Samba] Removed params 'force security mode' etc. What to use instead?

2013-07-11 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 05/07/13 16:10, Brian H. Nelson wrote: On 7/3/2013 4:54 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote: My guess is this is related to the Unix extensions. Basically certain versions of OS X; I can't remember which ones but 10.5 sticks in my mind but that might be related to symbolic links and it was 10.6 that

[Samba] Excessive allocations from RID master

2013-07-11 Thread Kristofer
I have a script that is adding about 16,000 users to my domain. While monitoring the script, I noticed that as soon as a user is added, 500 additional RID's are allocated from the RID Master Please see below the output of the CN=RID Manager$,CN=System and CN=RID Set,CN=DC1,OU=Domain

Re: [Samba] Excessive allocations from RID master

2013-07-11 Thread Kristofer
To add to this, I let my script continue until the rIDNextRID reached the end of the pool. This caused a waste of about 129,000 RID's. This concerns me because Microsoft has used 8 billion RID's in 12 years (http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/09/12/managing-rid-pool-depletion.aspx),

Re: [Samba] Excessive allocations from RID master

2013-07-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 20:02 -0500, Kristofer wrote: To add to this, I let my script continue until the rIDNextRID reached the end of the pool. This caused a waste of about 129,000 RID's. This concerns me because Microsoft has used 8 billion RID's in 12 years

Re: [Samba] Excessive allocations from RID master

2013-07-11 Thread Kristofer
It's just a bug, with a fix in master and a patch attached for 4.0 to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10014 Great, thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] [Announce] Samba 4.1.0rc1 Available for Download

2013-07-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 23:54 +0200, steve wrote: On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 20:31 +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote: Release Announcements = This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.1. Hi A bit confused about this: From git://git.samba.org/samba f387d9a..940395d

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

2013-07-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 01:03 -0300, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: But... will any NAS you know work with a Samba DC, or else, using an IPA server? Or will they only work with Microsoft Windows Server AD? One of the many reasons to upgrade to a Samba 4.0 AD DC is that if a NAS doesn't work

Re: [Samba] oLschema2ldif segfault

2013-07-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:11 -0500, Bo Kersey wrote: I'm seeing a oLschema2ldif segfault when it comes across attributetypes with syntax '1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.5' that is a BINARY attribute. Is this by design? Can I store binary attributes in samba4 ldap? We need to remove this

Re: [Samba] Samba4 KCC

2013-07-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 03:42 -0500, Kristofer wrote: Is the KCC in Samba4 set up to honor site links? I set up a few site links between sites (hub-spoke model), but Samba still appears to be replicating everything everywhere from each domain controller. Am I missing something? One of our

[Samba] Unable to connect to Samba server, but it shows on the network

2013-07-11 Thread renito73 Михаил
Hello friends I am trying to setup Samba on my Fedora 19 installation, but it does not work... although smbclient -L myserver shows my shares, I can't access any of them from other computers and even from the same server, it returns an error that could not connect to to the server... My very

[SCM] CTDB repository - branch master updated - ctdb-2.2-120-g412bc0e

2013-07-11 Thread Amitay Isaacs
The branch, master has been updated via 412bc0e20bef694d4e911dc9c984fd7716231f1f (commit) via a4afe7af9c9391048d6f80135bbd5e15367770c7 (commit) via 40f2825d6e818dc8c745b6385a545969dfb45fbc (commit) via 76703514040b804b880cab909f6ff52576f80f89 (commit) via

[SCM] CTDB repository - annotated tag ctdb-2.3 created - ctdb-2.3

2013-07-11 Thread Amitay Isaacs
The annotated tag, ctdb-2.3 has been created at 319e230914cebb1126e469bef115c469e9d4170e (tag) tagging 412bc0e20bef694d4e911dc9c984fd7716231f1f (commit) replaces ctdb-2.2 tagged by Amitay Isaacs on Thu Jul 11 17:06:59 2013 +1000 - Log

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-1-test updated

2013-07-11 Thread Karolin Seeger
The branch, v4-1-test has been updated via d95ed7f VERSION: Bump version number up to 4.1.0rc2... via ae2e0a6 VERSION: Disable git snapshots for the 4.1.0rc1 release. via 55b3970 WHATSNEW: Some updates. from fd036b8 WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 4.1.0rc1.

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2013-07-11 Thread Andreas Schneider
The branch, master has been updated via f387d9a ccan: Fix calling memset with zero length parameter from 6ac6bf9 docs: Bump version in meta data up to 4.1. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-1-stable updated

2013-07-11 Thread Karolin Seeger
The branch, v4-1-stable has been updated via ae2e0a6 VERSION: Disable git snapshots for the 4.1.0rc1 release. via 55b3970 WHATSNEW: Some updates. via fd036b8 WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 4.1.0rc1. via e5465d7 VERSION: Set version to 4.1.0rc1-GITSNAPSHOT.

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - annotated tag samba-4.1.0rc1 created

2013-07-11 Thread Karolin Seeger
The annotated tag, samba-4.1.0rc1 has been created at d760c03b5d38381ea61b20078341b8b8158e6946 (tag) tagging ae2e0a6063752b3c5485c9c9f50afc5dfdaa4acb (commit) replaces ldb-1.1.16 tagged by Karolin Seeger on Thu Jul 11 19:53:49 2013 +0200 - Log

[SCM] Samba Website Repository - branch master updated

2013-07-11 Thread Karolin Seeger
The branch, master has been updated via 70b8e7b Announce Samba 4.1.0rc1. from bc38ac6 Announce Samba 4.0.7. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba-web.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2013-07-11 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via 940395d smbd: Fix a 100% loop at shutdown time via 02ff6ab srvsvc: Use a symbolic constant where we have one from f387d9a ccan: Fix calling memset with zero length parameter http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master -