Hello all.
I can see that magic scripts are run in some mixed (between root and real user)
shell
environment.
Share definition is got from SambaMagicTray utility:
[autoscript]
comment = special directory for SAMBA-Magic Script
path = /var/magic
read only = no
locking = yes
Hello.
On 2 Nov 2003 at 11:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Windows XP clients can connect and map my shares to drives on their
machines with no problems, but sometimes after being connected for a
couple days they suddenly cannot access the share. They receive an error
message stating that it
Hello.
On 14 Oct 2003 at 11:51, Massimo Crisantemo wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Massimo Crisantemo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:51:57 +0200
Subject:[Samba] Re: security
:~$ mount
.
/dev/md0 on
Hello.
On 14 Oct 2003 at 8:02, J. Frisbie wrote:
From: J. Frisbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:02:44 -0400
Copies to: Subject:[Samba] SPAM
Hello,
I
Hi Erik.
On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:23, Erik Soderquist wrote:
Subject:RE: [Samba] security
Date sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:23:27 -0400
From: Erik Soderquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can these be adjusted from a windows
)
libpam.so.0 = /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x4033d000)
(note libacl libattr)
:~$ mount
.
/dev/md0 on /home type ext2 (rw,nosuid,nodev,usrquota,acl)
~$ uname -a
Linux woody 2.4.21 #2 Thu Aug 21 17:20:40 MSD 2003 i686 unknown
Alexey
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Lobanov [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Erik.
On 13 Oct 2003 at 16:52, Erik Soderquist wrote:
Subject:RE: [Samba] security
Date sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:52:32 -0400
From: Erik Soderquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexey Lobanov [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Samba List
Hi.
On 13 Oct 2003 at 14:23, Sampath Ganji wrote:
From the clients behind the router... everything (Internet, E-mail) is
okay. And also telnet 192.168.0.2 works good. But when the samba server
is searched from the Client (192.168.1.2 or 192.168.1.3 both running
windows XP) it fails.
Friends,
I ask you very much to help in the investigation. I could not find any documents
stating
that the Samba trivial databases must reside on sync-mounted filesystem in Linux (or
any
other OS). And I suspect that this bug (non-coherent modification of locking.tdb) is
widespread, but many
Hi Jeremy.
On 2 Oct 2003 at 15:17, Jeremy Allison wrote:
No it is not. I believe you may be having problems on your hardware/machine.
tdb's have been *extensively* tested on async mounted filesystems on the HP
PSA (I mean hundreds of thousands of hours of tests overall). This is why
the
Hi folks.
I continue to fight with regular locking database damage in Linux box. See
Bugzilla Bug 370.
The current question to gurus: what is the RIGHT behavoir of locking.tdb size?
Should it decrease when the number of records decreases? Or, it should stay at
maximal reached capacity?
Hi Gerald.
Date sent: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:41:22 -0500
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexey Lobanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Samba] Size of locking.tdb?
we never
Hi.
On 12 Sep 2003 at 9:22, Wilmar Guday wrote:
From: Wilmar Guday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:22:40 +0800
Subject:[Samba] Samba Share
Hi List,
I just setup samba running
Hello.
On 3 Sep 2003 at 8:14, Jarabe wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 08:14:06 -0600
Subject:Re: [Samba] acl
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jarabe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the same problem. I did everything that bluelightning
Hello.
On 3 Sep 2003 at 8:57, Jarabe wrote:
I ran ldd /usr/sbin/smbd and I didnt see any libacl.so or libattr.so.
I used the SRPMS that Gerry put out on the ftp site yesterday. I
installed the SRPM and edited the samba3.spec and added
--with-acl-support at the bottom. And yes I did add a \
Hi.
On 3 Sep 2003 at 9:34, Jarabe wrote:
. CLIP.
checking whether to support ACLs... checking for getxattr in -lattr...
no
checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no
checking for ACL support... no
So, your Samba does not see POSIX ACL and operates in conventional
Hello.
On 28 Aug 2003 at 19:13, Kopmann, Goetz wrote:
From: Kopmann, Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Samba (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:13:14 +0200
Subject:[Samba] ACLs through Apache on SuSe 8.2 ?
Does
Hello.
I have the following bad problem running Samba on Linux. After a quite short uptime
(couple of weeks) smbstatus starts to report that non-existent processes lock some non-
existent files:
23921 DENY_ALL 0x3 RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH [ Fri Aug 15 12:57:08 2003
(and dozens of lines like that,
Hello.
On 15 Aug 2003 at 13:04, Failed Access wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Failed Access [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:04:27 +0100
Subject:[Samba] Re: Samba3: PDC and local admins
Why does wordperfect
Hello.
On 15 Aug 2003 at 8:14, Azelton Sean (RBNA/CIT1) wrote:
From: Azelton Sean (RBNA/CIT1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: 15 Aug 2003 08:14:58 -0500
Subject:[Samba] Repost: group membership limitations and
20 matches
Mail list logo
