Robert Heller wrote:
At Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:52:49 -0400 Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
Hi all,
I ask this question about once a decade.
I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I
can do with Samba, even though I have no Windows computers?
I
Stev e Holdoway wrote:
The problem is that I'm descending further into the mire. Can't log on
to the PC as local administrator account is disabled, can't log on in
safe mode without arriving at the domain login screen, can't seem to
find anything on the server side to fix this.
Chris Rowson wrote:
On 19 May 2013 23:13, Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz wrote:
Can anyone help with this? I set it all up a few months ago, the samba
side being standard upgrades via debian - configured as a PDC, and the
windows 7 clients being clean installs, with the standard
Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Linda,
If you have filed a bugzilla report,
DateTitle
2011-07-27 *Bug 8325*
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8325 - WINS should no
longer be changing 'case' on hostnames'
Samba has multiple areas of case mangling problems that cause
incompatibilities
when used with windows or linux clients.
How viable is the idea of fixing the problems? Would the sky fall in if
it preserved case, but
either 'ignored it', or gave preference to matches that included the
case
I'm trying to join a 2nd workstation to my domain -- but it can't find
the domain
name.
It's a Win7 machine (same as 1st)...all settings are the same and
wireshark shows the problem is the DC is claiming it can't find
the domain name (that it is the DC for!?)... um...
Lets see:
wbinfo
Alessio Tomelleri - ARPAV Dipartimento di Belluno wrote:
Is not clear to me why if I query my user, randomly it doesn't show mine
Domain Local Group, only Global Group... I underline this happen
randomly, it seems to me...
Finally I would ask some clarification about option compat in
viktor ruhle wrote:
Hello list,
I have tried rather much (forums, google) and trying this as the last option.
The problem is that
one is not able to access group samba shares from windows 7 machines,
everything ok from win-ts-2003 xp machines. Every user belongs to his
primary group
To support reliability, I have 2 network connections from my win7
client to my home server.
Both the server and the client have 2 **internal** 192.168.3.XXX
addressses...
Doing a reverse DNS lookup, on either of the interfaces will return the
same hostname.
Doing a forward DNS lookup on
I have a bunch of these in my log... Was wondering if anyone had seen them
before
and what the cause might be? Thanks...
Oct 1 03:25:15 Ishtar smbd[23925]: [2011/10/01 03:25:15, 0]
lib/util.c:1468(smb_panic)
Oct 1 03:25:15 Ishtar smbd[23925]: PANIC (pid 23925): internal error
Oct
simo wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 18:16 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
I didn't like re-enabling the feature as it re-introduces something
that was widely regarded as a security hole,
People widely regarded the earth as flat and ... well sometime
ago
Jeremy Allison wrote:
We needed to make it impossible to configure Samba insecurely. At the
time this was proposed, it was posted to the list and no dissenting
voices were heard.
---
Not exactly true -- as soon as this feature was available for testing
in a downloadable package, there
Jeremy Allison wrote:
I didn't like re-enabling the feature as it re-introduces something
that was widely regarded as a security hole,
People widely regarded the earth as flat and ... well sometime ago,
as in some areas, as only 6000 years old...
but recognised the need
some sites have
François Legal wrote:
Not sure if this is relevant, but if (first case shown down here)
Domain Admins is not so much a group but a map to unix group, I'm
not surprised that you can't add users to this using sambe. I would
rather use /etc/group or whatever to add users to the unix group
Harry Jede wrote:
On 15:48:09 wrote Linda Walsh:
I created the well known group Domain Admins pointing to a local
group, but I am not able to add users to the group -- it claims I
can only add users to
local or global groups...
But I only see local, domain ,well-known, builtin
One of the more 'interesting commands (haven't done any tracing back
yet)...'
net usersidlist
# net usersidlist
root
S-1-5-21-3-7-3-500
S-1-1-0
S-1-5-2
S-1-5-11
S-1-22-2-0
S-1-22-2-1
S-1-22-2-5
S-1-22-2-8
S-1-22-2-10
S-1-22-2-14
S-1-22-2-15
S-1-22-2-16
S-1-22-2-17
S-1-22-2-18
I was wondering if anyone already had completion files for samba utils like
'net' wbinfo...etc... I can never remember all the params, I keep wanting
to hit tab to autocomplete for options like I can on many other sys
utils.
So I started looking at examples of existing completion files and
Thomas Bork wrote:
On 11.09.2011 01:41, Linda W wrote:
This sounds like https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8412.
I don't think, it's the same problem. I already tried without oplocks
and smb2 isn't activated here.
Anyway - I could test a patch for 3.5.11.
Don't know if
tried to add them to my domain, they all became unlistable
and unusable.
Color me confused?
-linda
Linda Walsh wrote:
I created the well known group Domain Admins pointing to a local group,
but I am not able to add users to the group -- it claims I can only
add users to
local or global groups
I created the well known group Domain Admins pointing to a local group,
but I am not able to add users to the group -- it claims I can only add
users to
local or global groups...
But I only see local, domain ,well-known, builtin.
There are no global groups unless one would include all groups
Hah! Caught it in the act!...
Filed it with a bug report talking about the problem...
Shows me being offered a choice between two icon types (anyone know what
those are? for 'BLISS' (the newly mangled samba name) and 'Bliss' (the
original name)...
Yes... more than one person has noticed it...
I think it has to do with SMB2 keeping multiple descriptors open in,
perhaps, a cache,
to the same file...
When Windows writes 'many' (not all), files out, it will first 'create'
the 'name' of the
new file to verify access in the target
Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
A call to wbcGetpwnam() with BUILTIN\Administrators
name (string) returns error 7 (WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND).
I tried just Administrators and got the same error.
Same error with user (string) Everyone also.
I've noticed this problem as well...
In
Michael Wood wrote:
P.S. Sorry for the mostly off-topic post.
If it's mostly not about samba, it's probably 'ok' t0 NOT cc the list..?
:-)
Turning off that param, BTW, did help -- some things that hadn't been
working started, and then gave all sorts of new indications of
problems.
With
Michael Wood wrote:
Hi
On 3 August 2011 08:59, Linda Walsh sa...@tlinx.org wrote:
Among various problems since I upgraded to 3.6 (none of which got answered
really, -- so I backgraded to 3.5.10 and started debugging from there,
considering 3.6.0 too unstable/too incompatible
Michael Wood wrote:
I didn't get the benefit of '*' added to my wbinfo...
I don't understand what you mean by this.
Just saw this note by Bendikt Schindler:
Of course, as noted earlier, my wbinfo also doesn't seem to know about
builtin SID's either .. so am having to add
` Michael Wood wrote:
Hi Linda
Yeah...reported this a month ago... as well as other TDB/SID backend probs:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2011-July/078663.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2011-July/078826.html
---
I wasn't sure if it was a 3.6 problem
..Michael Wood wrote:
Personally, reading through and replying to a message like this takes
me a lot of time. As I said I can't speak for the Samba developers,
but perhaps trying to keep your messages shorter will produce better
responses?
---
In some cases, certainly, in other cases,
` Mark Reidenbach wrote:
I tried enabling SMB2 on our network after upgrading to samba 3.6 and
experienced the following problems. Commenting out Max Protocol = SMB2
makes the windows7 and vista clients happy.
- [homes] Trying to open a html file in notepad fails on Windows7 Pro
SP1.
` Mark Reidenbach wrote:
What I meant to say is that Thunderbird downloads every message every
time it is launched when I have max protocol = smb2 enabled.�
Without that line it checks the headers and is done.� Even if it's not
efficient I don't mind it downloading and caching the message
T L wrote:
Hi list,
Does Samba support large extended attributes? By this I'm referring to
attributes that are alternate streams attached to a file.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364404%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Seeing a problem when the referenced stream points to large files (sometimes
I realized in looking at my smb.conf, I'm not using these in
a consistent manner, and well I just don't understand what the
differences are between them.
Sure I can read the smb.conf page:
%U
session username (the username that the client wanted, not
necessarily the
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
since I was bitten badly by this today, I take the additional time to
report this issue here.
After upgrading from samba 3.5.8 to 3.6.0rc3, Administrator on the xp
clients (yes, still xp sp3, no vista, no win7 clients here) lost its
admin privileges.
My Samba
Among various problems since I upgraded to 3.6 (none of which got answered
really, -- so I backgraded to 3.5.10 and started debugging from there,
considering 3.6.0 too unstable/too incompatible for 'whatever' reason...
One of the probs I had was 'root' couldn't use net rpc anything --
kept
When I access my PDC, via a unix service,
from a Domain client with a domain login,
the PDC attempts to validate Domain\User against the the
authentication DB, but on a mounted file system,
a user on the PDC = 'domain\user' ... (which is what
I thought it should be).
But if I use 'ssh Pdc',
it
Julien Celle wrote:
it appears that the logon home parameter
should be set to the following value :
logon home = \\%L\%U
instead of the one I was using :
logon home = \\%L\homes\%U
I don't really understand why. Anybody could explain ?
I have noticed, (I use %D instead of %L),
I'm seeing this for several lookups in winbind for items
that I have not explicitly added. Should I add them?
Could not find domain for
Could not convert sid S-0-0: NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED
Could not find domain for sid S-1-1-0
Could not convert sid S-1-1-0: NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED
Could
John H Terpstra wrote:
On 07/21/2011 10:07 AM, Tanuki uk wrote:
Hello,
I'm quite new to Samba administration and I've inherited a working samba
setup with roaming profiles however the login and logout times for
users has
been growing and I'm starting to think it's time do something about
Mike Eggleston wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011, John Drescher might have said:
We've been trying to get a newly loaded Win7 (64-bin) box to join our internal
Samba domain. The error that keeps appearing is the win7 box can't find the
domain controller and is looking for the registry keys
I think this is one of my config problems.
my tdb map backend is the default tdb with manually setup accounts after
provisioning a new db to get the builtins.
While it works for my domain, if some app requests '*' group/user
enumeration (an app running on a domain-client (machine joined,
I made progress in tracking down a problem on cygwin that's been bothering
me for a while since Win7 and domain.
when I do:
mkpasswd -D
mkpasswd (434): [31] A device attached to the system is not functioning.
A network trace shows that it's trying to get the home dir
information from my main
I'm also seeing messages from nmbd saying (msgs reformatted/truncated for
readability).
wins...request: Name refresh for name BLISS00 IP 192.168.3.12
wins...request: Name BLISS00 group bit = True does not match group \
bit in WINS for this name.
wins...request: Name refresh for
Moe, John wrote:
Hello all,
Relevant info up front: Gentoo PC, using 2.6.38 kernel and Samba 3.4.12.
I'm trying to get a FreeRadius instance working for our Windows network.
To do so, I need a Linux box running Samba. I've installed and
configured Kerberos, Samba and FreeRadius, and can get
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 06/24/2011 12:11 AM, Linda W wrote:
David was trying to view and change permissions on a user that was
already listed on the security tab; he was not adding a user or group.
I did this just now, changed it to full control for the one listed
user and group
On 24/06/11 09:46 AM, John G. Heim wrote:
I'm setting up a new linux fileserver and I was wondering if samba
likes one filesystem more than another. I have to format a 1.8Tb
partition sometime today and I'll probably do ext3 unless samba
prefers something else.
I would use
John Drescher wrote:
� � � �I would use 'xfs'. �I believe samba was originally developed
over xfs, so it's likely the ea-suppot and acl support has had the most
testing there. �Especially if your file server is setup with a UPS, then I'd
strongly recommend it. � If not, ext4 might be safer (with
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Try to start winbind, then
wbinfo --ccache-save
and
net --use-ccache
Haven't tested that for a while, so it might not work. But
it's supposed to :-)
Maybe the options were removed? or maybe needs special compile options for
them to be
included?
wbinfo
Linda Walsh wrote:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Try to start winbind, then
wbinfo --ccache-save
and
net --use-ccach
Haven't tested that for a while, so it might not work. But
it's supposed to :-)
Maybe the options were removed? or maybe needs special compile options
for them to be
included
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:06:23PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Try to start winbind, then
wbinfo --ccache-save
and
net --use-ccache
Haven't tested that for a while, so it might not work. But
it's supposed to :-)
Maybe the options were
David Aldrich wrote:
Hi
We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12.
The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a
Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting
executable has the sticky bit
Linda Walsh wrote:
David Aldrich wrote:
Hi
We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and
gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either
a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a
Windows 7 share the resulting executable
I have a minorly complicated root password that is hard to type correctly,
quicklyyet samba 'seems' to be encouraging me to create a
simple one in order to do managagement on the server via 'net'
I don't like to type the password more than once, the more times I type it,
the more
Lang, Rich wrote:
Hello,
We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES.
Its primary application is to serve out a single network drive to support our
business (out 350GB in size). For several years, this solution has been
running flawlessly. File access was
After an upgrade, I got re-bitten by the 'unix-extensions and
wide links' incompat. (They used to be compat but were made
incompat in the 3.4.x timeframe due to security concerns).
At the time it was suggested I write a patch complete
with documentation to describe the fix. The below
seems
Linda Walsh wrote:
upgraded to opensuse 11.4.
basic smbd is running mostly fine (some name res-errors, login server
missing, (can't connect to Domain service). Notably nmbd won't start due
to undefined symbols:
/usr/sbin/nmbd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/nmbd: undefined symbol
simo wrote:
Any ideas as to what library i'm missing?
Looks like nmbd is not being linked against libtalloc.
---
Sure looks like it, but shouldn't it be dynamically loaded?
The libtalloc packages ARE installed.
I must have something messed up for the standard distro-packages not
I just upgraded my samba to my dist's version:
(3.5.7) and got a message:
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
Ishtar smbd[8204]: Share 'IPC$' has wide links and unix extensions enabled.
These parameters are incompatible. Wide links will be disabled
I just recently upgraded to opensuse 11.4.
basic smbd is running mostly fine (some name res-errors, login server missing,
(can't connect to Domain service). Notably nmbd won't start due
to undefined symbols:
/usr/sbin/nmbd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/nmbd: undefined symbol:
Juan Pablo wrote:
Thanks a lot for the advice. It will run these tests and try to find meaningfull
information from them. I will post back results.
Thanks
Juan Pablo
What type of speeds are you expecting?
With a GB network, your limit is 125MB/s. I get that
with
Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:02:56PM -0700, Juan Pablo wrote:
- 4 Intel Gigagit ethernet NIC ports with 802.3ad bonding connected to a
switch configured tu use 802.3ad
- 8 2TB 7.2 krpm SATA disks with hardware RAID5 (RAID stripe size 1024
bytes, controller and disk cache
vijay vijay wrote:
Hi All,
I have gone through threads related to throughput issue in this list. Found few
similar issue, but could not get the solution.
So looking for some advice from group.
I am trying to use the samba to access a USB disk connected to our evaluation
board which has
Daniel Müller wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:24:17 -0700, Linda Walsh sa...@tlinx.org wrote:
Daniel MCller wrote:
This is working with samba sernet newest release:
This is setting the bit for the group even with msoffice-files
correctly
directory mask=2770
force directory mode
Daniel MCller wrote:
This is working with samba sernet newest release:
This is setting the bit for the group even with msoffice-files correctly
directory mask=2770
force directory mode=2770
create mask = 2770
force create mode=2770
force security mode=2770
I've been getting these in my log for some time and was wondering what I had
to do to get 'pam_winbind' to 'work' with my samba 'DC'?
In looking around the net, others w/this error message were having a
problem with blocking login's and password changes, completely.
In my case, I have the
Bob Miller wrote:
...
lotsa stuff...
tnx,
will have to do a bit of investigation at this point
Thanks for the 'encouragement' (i.e. it works for you!)
Gives me something to go on ... (though may take a while
to verify all the nuts bolts...).
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
Supriya Kher wrote:
windows machine writes to \\Linux IPAddress\output. It has been
observed consistently that accessing the shared folder from windows using
UNC as \\LinuxIpAddress\output
takes a very long time. Each access takes around 45 to 50 seconds !
though there are no network
I have:
interfaces = lo0, eth2
and:
socket address = 192.168.3.1
socket address = 127.0.0.l
in my smb.conf, but when I try to
net group add anything (on server running samba 3.5.2, as a DC):
asks for current log'ed in users's password mypwd
Could not connect to server 127.0.0.1
Connection
John Drescher wrote:
Also. They can NOT point to the same path. That was the point of
having a .v2. Vista+ and XP profiles are not compatible with each
other.
What part is incompatible? Or is it known?
This this is something that I ran into as well, but didn't have
time to chase
I have /home as a logical volume. I have snapshots:
LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert
2010.02.05-01.26.19 Home swi-ao 10.00G lvol0 39.81
2010.02.06-02.37.52 Home swi-ao 5.00G lvol00.25
lvol0
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:37:28AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3)
[2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl)
FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes
needed
I don't know if this was present (maybe not?) when the script was written, but
the script for taking a snapshot in the instructions for shadow_copy: that looks
like this:
xfs_freeze -f /home/
lvcreate -L10M -s -n $SNAPNAME /dev/Home/lvol0
xfs_freeze -u /home/
mkdir
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
For raw bandwidth maximization, what port and protocol are used won't
make much difference, if any. In fact it shouldn't make _any_
difference in raw b/w. Communications between the Samba server and
Win2K client appear to be exclusively over TCP 139 at this point
according
Igor wrote:
I don't find it strange at all. Your computer is acting as a traffic
proxy between two samba servers. If you have 100Mb network interface
your bandwidth should split exactly in two.
But he said he doesn't get a split in two when a win2k server
is used (he gets 11Mbps).
I've made some pseudo progress .. I deleted my DNS domain name from my
client -- after that, I was able to get a message (Welcome to Bliss Domain) -- followed by 'Domain join failed, you will not be in the Domain. Reboot now to activate your new domain name.
Upon reboot, it thinks I am in
I have a few errors I'm trying to chase down in an effort to get a
Win7 client in my domain. WinXP works -- tested unjoining and
rejoining today, and it can still join.
I have the registry adds for DNSNameResolutionRequired=0 under
LanmanServerClient/Params (put it in both places in attempt to
Moray Henderson wrote:
The server string is Ishtar, but that is not the server name; you need
to set netbios name for that.
Wouldn't the hostname take care of that? That's the name of the
machine.
I don't recall ever adding that param before (remember, this does work
on an XP
David Southwell wrote:
Just want to ask the obvious questions as I did not see it mentioned.. what
version of Windows 7 is the client machine?
---
Sorry, meant to include this...
64-bit, Final Release, Complete [marketed under buzzword 'Ultimate'].
--
To unsubscribe from this
Moray Henderson wrote:
Something to do with the name of the machine?
---
SMB server name is 'ishtar', Domain 'Bliss' (Ha!, wishful thinking...
it's a goal!)), and Win7 client is 'athenae'. All are in DNS domain
'sc.tlinx.org'
(an internal domain name). Theoretically straightforward.
Moray Henderson wrote:
Last time I saw something like this, it was because the client (Win XP)
did not have a WINS server set, and couldn’t find the domain. Can you
ping the server from the problem client - by IP address and by name? Is
its firewall blocking any SMB ports?
---
mickey harvey wrote:
I am trying to access a samba share from windows 7. The samba version is
3.3.3 on FreeBSD 7.2, The samba daemons are running and I can see the server
in my Network Places on the Windows client. When I try to login using the
username spacebizall and password (the same as the
Ryan Casey wrote:
I'm trying to join a Windows 7 client to a samba domain. We're
running samba 3.3.9 from SerNet. I've changed the registry settings
on the Win7 client per the wiki page
(http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7).
Unfortunately, I'm still getting:
The following error occurred
Justin Piszcz wrote:
When performing a lot of file I/O on a samba share, I see the following:
Nov 15 16:01:47 l1 smbd[31472]: ERROR! Out of file structures
Is the proper fix to, e.g.:
ulimit -n 32768 before starting samba?
Or is there a samba-specific option that should be used instead?
Daniel M|ller wrote:
After a lot of trying this is the solution for all with samba 3.2.15
installed. My Windows 7 client machine joins the domain on the fly
with this registry hack.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Para
meters]
Even though Samba doesn't use all of the NT privileges, does it allow assigning
them to domain
users or groups?
I.e. this list:
|Group Policy Name|Constant Name|
|Access this computer from the network|SeNetworkLogonRight |
|Access
After I mapped a local group to a domain group, I'm not longer able
edit it with 'net sam'.
Is there another tool I should use? How do I add users on other
computers, in the domain to the group?
I don't see a tool on a client station for allowing editing of
domain groups??
I tried a
Thanks to various inputs (and lots of reading/rereading of my books/manpages)
and lots of experimentation...(and light bulbs turning on).
I now have windows ACLS/permissions working on my samba shares and they are
being automatically stored in the XFS xattrs. (I checked that they are being
In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or
share.
Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored
in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level,
and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section?
Michael Wood wrote:
S means it can be used in a share definition and also in the Global section:
I've sorta got it in my head that most (S) switch that could make sense
globally,
could be used/set in the global section as a 'default' for all shares, but
I don't find that documented in the
IF a samba server is setup to be a domain controller, should
it's local SID = the domain SID?
Also, what are the requirements of a SID?
I usually see S-1-5-21-x-y-z, where x,y,z = 10 digits, but
could x,y,z be 1,2,3 (for example)? I.e. do they have to be
10 digit numbers or can they be
simo wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:42 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
IF a samba server is setup to be a domain controller, should
it's local SID = the domain SID?
yes the PDC exports the local SAM as the domain SAM
(the SAM is the DB where user information is stored including SIDs
This may already be fixed, but various places talk about the need
for a 'user_xattr' switch on mounts to use extended attributes.
I've never known 'xfs' to have such a switch -- if they are enabled
in the kernel, they just work -- I tried it.
I also tried adding the switch and verified it is not
I recently decided to upgrade to the tdbsam: backend, but I'm
missing the built-security principles.
Do I need to go back to the smbpasswd backend, and add them in
the file *first* before converting?
I had them there at one point, but I think I think I deleted
them because they weren't working.
FYI -- I tried adding then with pdbedit but it said they don't exist
in /etc/passwd -- but they 'do'...just with not the same exact names.
I was going to use the 'map' command to map the names from the tdbsam
to the unix side, but I have to get them into the tdb sam first.
Also, I really wasn't
Previously I wrote (abbreviated msg summary):
nmbd: become_domain_master_browser_bcast: Attempting to become dom mast \
browser, wrkgrp BLISS, subnet 192.168.3.1; nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c: \
become_domain_master_browser_bcast(304)
become_dom_master_browser_bcast: querying subnet 192.168.3.1
The only thing related to 'addresses' in my
/etc/samba/smb.conf file is a hosts allow:
hosts allow = 192.168.3.0/24 127.1
I'm going to ignore the 'local hosts case, as if I solve the other,
the localhost case may get solved by inference.
I thought the 'hosts allow' would allow any host
John Drescher wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ian McDonald i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:
Raid 5 is not a good setup for performance...
Its not good for database performance and random small writes but it
shines in large file operations. Either way a 3 disk raid5 (software
or hardware)
Under log level (debuglevel)
there is nothing to indicate what the numbers mean, there is only the
enumeration of debug-sections.
While I wouldn't need what each number does in each debug area,
I did note the following helpful behavior regarding use of numbers
only (which I presume
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
Especially since John Terpstra's home setup uses a 4-disk RAID and
gets up to 90MB xfers over CIFS. (Is that with standard size network/TCP
packetsizes? Or anything non-default for tuning on that?) :-)
My TCP/IP is at default
use UTF-8 on your samba server (delete both the unix and display
charset). Might check to see that your server is setup in UTF-8
as well, but I think this is the default in SuSE these days.
(see /etc/sysconfig/language and related variables and manpages).
That should pass through file-name
99 matches
Mail list logo
