Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:37:23PM -0600, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Obviously such a special case would make the code ugly...but I might try
patching it just for my own testing to see if it makes any difference.
Any pointers you can offer?
That's exactly the case I
Jeremy Allison wrote:
A strace on the smbd process receiving the files from the windows box
(it is mapped as a share on the 2k3 server) reveals that smbd is looking
up the entire directory (with getdents64) every time it writes a file.
Several times, in fact. So as the number of files grows,
Apologies if this is a FAQ.
We are saddled with some directories full of production image files that
number in the hundreds of thousands to the millions. (Yes, I know this
is bad.) They reside on a couple of Win 2003 boxes that are flaky and
unreliable. I was hoping to copy them over to a
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:08:56PM -0600, Matt Mitchell wrote:
A strace on the smbd process receiving the files from the windows box
(it is mapped as a share on the 2k3 server) reveals that smbd is looking
up the entire directory (with getdents64) every time it writes
some gymnastics. I'm not aware of any
such feature.
If nothing can be done, I suppose I will have to suggest that we move to
per-user working copies, but if anyone has any other suggestions I'd
love to hear them.
Thanks in advance,
Matt Mitchell
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:23:15PM -0500, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Obviously this is a feature of filesystem semantics, so my question is
this: does samba provide a hook or feature, similar to the
preexec/postexec script, except for a file write? I am willing to deal
