So, we're doing a bad thing and re-exporting an NFS file system via
Samba. For the most part it's always worked fairly well and we've been
cognizant of the various locking scenarios that can come up.
Recently, we've run into issues exposing NFS file systems sitting on
RHEL6. Our Samba server
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:11:31PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
So, we're doing a bad thing and re-exporting an NFS file system via
Samba. For the most part it's always worked fairly well and we've been
cognizant of the various locking scenarios that can come up.
Recently, we've run
I am using either DOMAIN or ADS for authentication and am trying to
understand how UID/GID mapping rules are triggered.
This[1] seems to suggest that if I do not specify the idmap uid/gid
parameters in smb.conf, then authenticated usernames are mapped to
local user accounts having the same name.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:56:55AM -0800, Chernoguz, Inessa wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current
version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to
upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any
problem with
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:09:50AM -0800, John Stile wrote:
I have been using 2003 AD servers for winbind for many years, and now
2008 is phasing in, but I can't authenticate using the new servers, and
I'm not sure what to do. All advice very welcome.
This is a problem for me on both Gentoo
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:06:03AM -0700, Robert Freeman-Day wrote:
Ray,
There was indeed an issue with the old RHEL samba packages and 2008r2.
There was a bug report issued about it and RHEL released a newer samba
package that can talk 2008r2:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:16:31PM -0700, Robert Freeman-Day wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2010 11:49 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:06:03AM -0700, Robert Freeman-Day wrote:
Ray,
There was indeed an issue with the old RHEL samba
I have a number of Samba servers on RHEL (Samba 3.0.33) in an AD
environment using a mix of Windows 2008 and windows 2008 R2 servers.
Configuration file is pretty minimal:
[global]
workgroup = AVWORLD
security = DOMAIN
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
max log size = 500
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:49:33PM -0800, Jon Forrest wrote:
I have a Sun 7310 storage server. This is
running Solaris 10 but it's self-contained
and I can't login to it or run Samba on it.
I manage it with a web interface.
I have a CentOS 5.3 machine that mounts
a bunch of file systems
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Moray Henderson wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Hi folks. Periodically a workgroup shows up on our network with an
inappropriate name. We're trying to find the best way to track this
down as it's quite intermittent.
We can obviously look
This seems to be a decent way to tell right when the workgroup shows
up, but I don't think it helps us track down which IP address is
responsible for generating it, or helping us narrow down the subnet its
on even... (if I'm wrong, please correct me on that).
Right now we're sifting through
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:18:13AM -0800, Moray Henderson wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
This seems to be a decent way to tell right when the workgroup shows
up, but I don't think it helps us track down which IP address is
responsible for generating it, or helping us narrow down the subnet
Hi folks. Periodically a workgroup shows up on our network with an
inappropriate name. We're trying to find the best way to track this
down as it's quite intermittent.
We can obviously look for announcement messages (in broadcast packets
on ports 138/139), but this must be done on each subnet
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:06:21AM -0800, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:48:19AM -0500, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com
wrote:
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the response. To clarify, we are not re-exporting via NFS but
via Samba. We've run in this mode for several years,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:37:56AM -0800, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com wrote:
Hi Ray,
Thanks for the reply.
I'm trying to understand what the risk is of turning off the posix
locking for the [home] shares? I don't fully understand the issue and
further more, why this is now raising its
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:50:16AM -0800, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com wrote:
Thanks again for the reply Ray.
We are running a current version on the Netapp side and from what I can
tell, there is no tweaking we can do there. I'm looking into this with
RedHat and thus far they have not
(Yes, I should upgrade Samba to 3.0.35).
We're running the Sun provided Samba daemon (SUNWsmbau and friends) on
Solaris 10 Generic_13-08 (sparc).
Lots of Windows clients (mixed XP, 2003, 2008) hit this server and
periodically we'll start seeing smbd processes begin piling up. These
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:41:46PM -0700, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:18:19PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
# pfiles -F 25067
10: S_IFREG mode:0644 dev:85,60 ino:4630 uid:0 gid:0 size:327680
O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE
advisory read lock set by process 21130
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:37:15PM -0700, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:18:19PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
(Yes, I should upgrade Samba to 3.0.35).
We're running the Sun provided Samba daemon (SUNWsmbau and friends) on
Solaris 10 Generic_13-08 (sparc).
Lots
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:15:59PM -0700, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:09:06PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I'm not sure how to do this either. Guess I could pfiles on every
other PID on the system.
See my other mail, this looks like a good hint.
BTW, you don't
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:21:35PM -0700, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:19:03PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Hmm, yes, there is some of that. I guess I was thrown off by the fact
that the lock appeared to be on the .tdb file and the .tdb file
wouldn't be accessed by any
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:34:29PM -0700, Volker Lendecke wrote:
You need to find the one holding the lock the others are
waiting for and see what that guy is blocking on. Everything
else is pure speculation.
It appears mdb is what I want to use. See this[1] page if anyone is
curious.
We're doing a test deployment of a Samba 3.0.33 server (RHEL 5.4) which
is slated to replace two existing file servers -- one running Windows
2003 (known as qalab_server) and another running Samba (known as
qalinux).
We've brought the new server up and are trying to test client access to
it to
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:03:56AM -0700, Tam McLaughlin wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to join my server to a Win2k AD domain.
I have configured kerberos and can get a ticket but when I try to join the
AD I get the error Failed to join domain: No logon servers as detailed
below.
I have
Hi all, I have a share set up as follows:
[images]
path = /images
read only = No
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 2770
hide special files = yes
hide files = /lost+found/
acl group control = yes
inherit acls = yes
map acl inherit = yes
inherit permissions = yes
map archive
Hi all, I'm trying to join several RHEL 4.7 based machines (Samba
3.0.28) to our domain here. I'm trying to do this via the net rpc
commands as this has typically worked fine in the past (iow: not doing
net ads join).
My smb.conf is as follows:
[global]
workgroup = DOMAIN
netbios name =
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:47:12AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to join several RHEL 4.7 based machines (Samba
3.0.28) to our domain here. I'm trying to do this via the net rpc
commands as this has typically worked fine in the past (iow: not doing
net ads join).
Follow-up
I'm trying to configure a Fedora 7 machine to authenticate access to
shares via AD. This works fine on other RHEL machines, but the same
configuration on Fedora maddeningly does not.
I've tried oodles of different configurations, and am currently using
something based on:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 07:28:04AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ray,
Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [AVWORLD\ray5147]!
Figure out why 'getent passwd AVWORLD\ray5147' fails. Make sure
the libnww_winbind library is installed
I have a situation involving Samba that I _believe_ may be the fault of
a buggy or old NFS daemon, but am not sure. I'm hoping someone can
explain to me what is going on here (I have found a workaround).
I have a Samba server on Fedora 7 (3.0.25b + whatever patches Fedora
includes). This server
I'm trying to join my FC6 box to our Active Directory domain. For the most
part the setup was pretty straightforward, but it just doesn't seem like
winbind separator is being honored.
When I do a 'getent passwd' I get the following:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:15:20PM -0700, Roland Hordos wrote:
If I run a 'finger username' nothing is returned -- but if I run a
'finger
AVWORLD\\username' the entry _is_ returned.
I needed this to get around fully qualified user accounts on FC5
3.0.23c:
winbind use default
32 matches
Mail list logo
