Felipe Martinez Hermo wrote:
Scott Lovenberg escribió:
On Feb 6, 2008 4:19 AM, Felipe Martinez Hermo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sinisa Bandin escribió:
Felipe Martinez Hermo wrote:
OK, so we're apples to apples, so to speak
On Feb 6, 2008 4:19 AM, Felipe Martinez Hermo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sinisa Bandin escribió:
Felipe Martinez Hermo wrote:
OK, so we're apples to apples, so to speak; the servers are tuned
the same. I'll assume your disks are tuned from hdparm and up to
snuff, otherwise you
Felipe Martinez Hermo wrote:
Hi, everybody!
I have been using samab on Debian for years and I have recently
migrated my file server from version 3.0.14a-3sarge2 to 3.0.24-6etch4.
One or our applications stores its data in a shared folder. This data
is distributed in over 29000 files of
Res wrote:
Hi Brad,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
I'm using FC6 and the servers have all been upgraded from FC2 and
FC4. The upgrade was completed before I took them over so I don't
know what samba version
was in use with those versions of Fedora.
Using Fedora as a server
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 7:38 AM, Felipe Martinez Hermo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got vfs_cache_pressure = 100 on both servers and ext3 filesystems
on both.
These are the files on /proc/sys/vm:
slow server:
file
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2008-02-01 13:32 page-cluster
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2008-02-01 13:32 swappiness
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2008-02-01 13:32 vfs_cache_pressure 0
10
3000
40
500
0
0
65536
957
2
0
50
3
60
100
Scott Lovenberg escribió:
Felipe Martinez Hermo wrote
On Feb 1, 2008 5:35 PM, Res [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Brad Horrocks [Secure Office Services] wrote:
Thanks guys,
You've pretty well confirmed I was beating a dead horse (so to speak).
I've downloaded slackware12 and am about to install it into a
development server.
Harol Hunter wrote:
2008/1/28, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 28, 2008 1:39 PM, Harol Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see I still alive (I don't know for how long but ... ;-)
Well let me tell you all my users have a SID and a UID in her/his
accounts entries
Brad Horrocks [Secure Office Services] wrote:
Res,
(I use openwebmail, I'll use the CR for you).
I'm using FC6 and the servers have all been upgraded from FC2 and FC4.
The upgrade was completed before I took them over so I don't know what samba version
was in use with those versions of
On Jan 25, 2008 11:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
i am using Ubuntu Server 6.06 with the smbldap installer script from
majen.net/smbldap/
I am using VMWare to run my test systems (Ubuntu server and Windows
Domain Clients)
After producing a power supply
On Jan 28, 2008 2:26 PM, JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason the Macintosh machines on our LAN have started taking
over as master browser without actually providing. Mostly these are
Leopard machines, and one Tiger machine. We had OS Level set to 255 and
that does not seem to make a
On Jan 25, 2008 12:45 PM, Harol Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/24, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Harol Hunter wrote:
Hi list:
I've been using samba+ldap as a PDC with roaming profiles for some
time but recently I joined some machines to the domain wich are used
On Jan 28, 2008 1:39 PM, Harol Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see I still alive (I don't know for how long but ... ;-)
Well let me tell you all my users have a SID and a UID in her/his
accounts entries in LDAP I'll attach you my full smb.conf hoping you
can help me, thanks a lot
Nelson Vale wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone knows how to hide a home share just for a particular user?
Thx
Nelson Vale
How do you mean hide? So that they can't browse it, or so that they
cannot see the 'homes' service? And do you mean hide from everyone
else, or hide from that user themselves?
Rick Cone,Secure Payment Systems wrote:
What would cause the View Workgroup Computers to be slow in coming up.
It will take from 10 seconds to 1 minute.
A am using Windows XP hosts with an SCO OpenServer using Samba in a
workgroup, and Samba is the preferred master (os 255) with WINS support.
On Jan 24, 2008 2:17 PM, Nelson Vale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
How do you mean hide? So that they can't browse it, or so that they
cannot see the 'homes' service?
What I wan't is to just hide (well wath I'd really wanted was to disable
it
but I don't know if it is possible),
Harol Hunter wrote:
Hi list:
I've been using samba+ldap as a PDC with roaming profiles for some
time but recently I joined some machines to the domain wich are used
by several users and then started the problems, the profiles loaded
are not the ones owned by the users, I mean user1 loads the
On Jan 21, 2008 12:24 PM, Gary Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built a Samba PDC with a ldap backend following the Howto:Samba
documentation http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:Samba.
I am using Fedora 8 with Samba 3.0.28 and FDS 1.1.I think I have a
working Samba PDC
On Jan 21, 2008 11:31 PM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 12:24 PM, Gary Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built a Samba PDC with a ldap backend following the Howto:Samba
documentation http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:Samba .
I am using Fedora 8
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Denis Cardon wrote:
Hi Jim,
Using simple authentication I have been able to tie FDS to Samba 3.x.24.
Knowing that the unix passwd and smb passwd are different, dare I ask
how difficult it would be to have them sync? Most of
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Denis Cardon wrote:
Hi Jim,
Using simple authentication I have been able to tie FDS to Samba 3.x.24.
Knowing that the unix passwd and smb passwd are different, dare I ask
how difficult it would be to have them sync?
Kyle Schmitt wrote:
This is a repost, since I'd really like to get some info about whats going on.
when using, mount -o remount on an linux box, I get a duplicate
mount instead of a proper remount.
/proc/mounts backs me up: the system really does have multiple mounts
in the same place, of the
Sounds like a bug I filed a couple of weeks ago. Do you have the line
msdfs proxy = no in your config, perchance? Ref:
0002554: msdfs proxy = no in smb.conf causes shares to be unavailable.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2554
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
Donald Woeltje wrote:
No matter what I try, I cannot get SWAT to work. No, I'm new to solaris, so
maybe I'm not doing something that should be done prior to trying to use SWAT.
Samba does seem to be working, somewhat. I can connect to a share using the
smbclient on the same solaris system
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
