to work for us in the past. But maybe that was pre-samba-3.0.
Todd
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Stuart Gall wrote:
On 6 Feb 2008, at 04:43, Todd Pfaff wrote:
Good point. I've now sent the output from 'smbpasswd -D 10' to the samba
mailing list.
Have you tried setting a user's samba password
.
Is this samba documentation incorrect?
Or am I doing something incorrectly?
cheers,
Todd
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:59:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Todd Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: samba-3.0.23d, smbpasswd, and NO PASSWORD
behaviour
The way it's documented
.
Is this samba documentation incorrect?
Or am I doing something incorrectly?
cheers,
Todd
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:59:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Todd Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: samba-3.0.23d, smbpasswd, and NO PASSWORD
behaviour
The way it's
] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(273)
check_ntlm_password: sam authentication for user [testuser] FAILED with
error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
Is it no longer possible for a user to change their own samba password
from null NO PASSWORD using the smbpasswd command?
--
Todd Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED
security problem.
If it's for new users, give them a temporary password through a secure
channel and require them to change it the first time they log on.
Todd Pfaff wrote:
I've had no responses to this question yet, and I'm still stuck with this
problem. Can anybody help, please
?
Was the behaviour of smbpasswd changed intentionally?
If so, in what samba version did this change happen?
Is there an alternative way to achieve the smbpasswd
behaviour that we had in the past?
Thanks,
--
Todd Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research High-Performance Computing Support
McMaster
