On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
Hi Scott, hi everyone
Yeah, that's fine.
Does this clear up the issue with the ':'? I should have made it clearer
that I was referring to autofs and not mounting e.g. from fstab. I just
tried the automounter on cifs without the
On 23/10/12 19:36, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:22:32 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 07:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:47:37 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Well, better confusion
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a warning when using NFS mounting syntax (server:/share),
instead of the usual UNC syntax (//server/share || \\server\share), that
support for NFS style mounts will be removed in version 6.0 of the mount.cifs
utility.
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
no one has objected (or really said anything). Can we merge this patch?
--
Hi
I'm just trying to represent users. Can we take this to user level by
giving an example of what will work and
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:47:37 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
no one has objected (or really said anything). Can we merge this patch?
--
Hi
I'm just trying to represent users. Can
On 10/23/2012 07:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:47:37 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Currently, we have this map: * -fstype=cifs,rw,sec=krb5
://myserver/myshare/
Does that really work? What purpose does the ':' serve
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
no one has objected (or really said anything). Can we merge this patch?
--
Hi
I'm just trying to represent users. Can we
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:22 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 07:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:47:37 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Currently, we have this map: * -fstype=cifs,rw,sec=krb5
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:22:32 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 07:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:47:37 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Currently, we have this map: * -fstype=cifs,rw,sec=krb5
On 10/23/2012 07:27 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
no one has objected (or really said anything). Can we merge this patch?
--
The following patch adds a warning when using NFS mounting syntax
(server:/share), instead of the usual UNC syntax (//server/share ||
\\server\share), that support for NFS style mounts will be removed in version
6.0 of the mount.cifs utility.
The reasoning for this is simple. Support for NFS
This patch adds a warning when using NFS mounting syntax (server:/share),
instead of the usual UNC syntax (//server/share || \\server\share), that
support for NFS style mounts will be removed in version 6.0 of the mount.cifs
utility.
The reasoning for this is simple. Support for NFS syntax
12 matches
Mail list logo
