hi,
well if i do enable privileges = no and admin users = @myadmins this
works intentionally. but jerry is right: there should be no use of uid=0
anymore.
greez
Günter Gersdorf wrote:
Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam database via usrmgr.
lib/smbldap.c: smbldap_open:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric A. Hall wrote:
| On 10/18/2005 9:26 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Günter Gersdorf wrote:
|
| | Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam
| | database via usrmgr.
| |
Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam database via usrmgr.
lib/smbldap.c: smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
Is this by design?
Günter Gersdorf
--
Guenter Gersdorf Phone: +49/(0)531/391-7634
Inst. f. Werkzeugmaschinen Fax:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Günter Gersdorf wrote:
| Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam
| database via usrmgr.
| lib/smbldap.c: smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
|
| Is this by design?
Yes. It is by design. You have to assign the
On 10/18/2005 9:26 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Günter Gersdorf wrote:
| Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam
| database via usrmgr.
| lib/smbldap.c: smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
|
| Is this by
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:05 -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/18/2005 9:26 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Günter Gersdorf wrote:
| Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam
| database via usrmgr.
| lib/smbldap.c:
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 22:05, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/18/2005 9:26 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Günter Gersdorf wrote:
| Domain Admins are not allowed to modify the ldapsam
| database via usrmgr.
| lib/smbldap.c: