4.0.7 DC, 4.0.7 fileserver, with openSUSE, w7 and xp clients.
cifs-utils 6.1 on Linux.
Hi
I have set:
kernel oplocks = yes
on the fileserver
If the xp client opens a file using e.g. Notepad, the opensuse client
can edit it at the same time and vica versa.
If I open the same file on each client
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:10:20PM +0200, Joris Heinrich wrote:
hallo list,
I have the following problem:
smb.conf
[global]
server string = file1.int.stayfriends.de
unix extensions = No
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
dns proxy
hallo list,
I have the following problem:
smb.conf
[global]
server string = file1.int.stayfriends.de
unix extensions = No
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
dns proxy = No
ldap ssl = no
read only = No
create mask =
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi,
I tried your configuration. Everything works, as long as i test with text
files. But when i tried with the java application i just get a lot of the
folowing errors:
*mmap failed for CEN and END part of zip
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Janez Kosmrlj postnali...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ernesto
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:42:16PM +0100, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
update.
For now it looks like fakeoplocks=yes in smb.conf is the solution. Also the
audit service on the client has to be turned off. We have to do some further
testing, but this looks like it is it for now.
NEVER use fake
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Janez Kosmrlj postnali...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ernesto Silva erniesi...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you try to mount with -o directio? Not sure
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ernesto Silva erniesi...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you try to mount with -o directio? Not sure this will
help, but it might be worth a try.
Volker
Hi, there is also another
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:33:48AM +0100, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
We have a strange file locking problem and i hope someone can help. We use
some CentOS 5 servers, which use samba 3.0.33, to share files of a java
application to clients. Clients are mostly CentOS 5 (same version as the
server),
Can you try to mount with -o directio? Not sure this will
help, but it might be worth a try.
Volker
Hi, there is also another parameter similar to directio, I don't know the
difference but seems more radical, it's forcedirectio. I have been using
it on linux clients which mounts a samba
Hi samba experts,
We have a strange file locking problem and i hope someone can help. We use
some CentOS 5 servers, which use samba 3.0.33, to share files of a java
application to clients. Clients are mostly CentOS 5 (same version as the
server), but there are a few legacy windows clients (the
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
now we are trying to migrate to Linux clients and this is where the
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
now we are trying to migrate to Linux clients and this is where the
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
now we are trying to migrate to Linux clients and this is where the
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
now we are trying to migrate to Linux clients and this is where the
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
now we are trying to migrate to Linux clients and this is where the
Hi,
I encountered an interesting problem. We have a Java application on a samba
server. The folder is then shared to the clients via a samba share. So far
it works OK. Until now we had windows clients and everything worked OK. But
now we are trying to migrate to Linux clients and this is where the
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Ravi
Channavajhalaravi.channavajh...@dciera.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:51:51AM +0530, ravi channavajhala wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Why would the file name be an issue here? It is not
Lately I'm seeing bizarre problems with the SAMBA server I'm using in
production. For no rhyme or reason the connections get dropped, the same
set of users who previously were able to access the shares, now get
permission denied. Users (not all but some) are having trouble opening the
folders,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:49:09PM +0530, ravi channavajhala wrote:
Lately I'm seeing bizarre problems with the SAMBA server I'm using in
production. For no rhyme or reason the connections get dropped, the same
set of users who previously were able to access the shares, now get
permission
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:51:51AM +0530, ravi channavajhala wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Why would the file name be an issue here? It is not just one file, several
files are getting affected. I followed your earlier discussion on
: Re: [Samba] file locking options in smb.conf
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:27:30AM -0700, Anoop P.A. wrote:
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the reply.
I want basic file locking work as expected. ( i.e. I want to prevent
files from getting corrupted while shared across multiple platforms).
If some
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:35:54PM -0700, Anoop P.A. wrote:
Hi list,
Any body implemented cross protocol file locking before? Any pointer
will help me a lot
Hi Volker,
CIFS - CIFS locking is not working as expected. It failed for me in
following scenario.
1. Opened a share using
An: volker.lende...@sernet.de
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: RE: [Samba] file locking options in smb.conf
Hi list,
Any body implemented cross protocol file locking before? Any pointer
will help me a lot
Hi Volker,
CIFS - CIFS locking is not working as expected. It failed for me in
following scenario.
1
Hi List,
I have a file server which runs samba-3.0.28a. My aim is to share a logical
volume ( with XFS filesystem) using SAMBA, NFS and FTP. Since it is a file
server I’m very much concerned about file locking. After googling and reading a
lot I had set file locking flags in smb.conf
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:42:57AM -0700, Anoop P.A. wrote:
Hi List,
I have a file server which runs samba-3.0.28a. My aim is to share a logical
volume ( with XFS filesystem) using SAMBA, NFS and FTP. Since it is a file
server I’m very much concerned about file locking. After googling
corrupted while sharing across multiple platform / multiple
protocols
Thanks
Anoop
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:06 PM
To: Anoop P.A.
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] file locking options
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:27:30AM -0700, Anoop P.A. wrote:
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the reply.
I want basic file locking work as expected. ( i.e. I want to prevent files
from getting corrupted while shared across multiple platforms).
If some file is opened writing in one client, other
I wanted to send a final post about this issue. I apologise for not
responding until 2 months later. For those interested, we ended up
just writing our logs to a Samba share that was outside of a Clearcase
share and we had no further issues with files being locked. So
that says that
I wanted to post again with the results of using Samba 3.2.8. Looks
like this did not solve our locking problem. We are still getting
permission denied errors when we try to do a mv of a log file inside
a Clearcase view via a Samba share to a different location. Again,
this is inside a Cygwin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:24:10PM -0800, Kathy wrote:
I wanted to post again with the results of using Samba 3.2.8. Looks
like this did not solve our locking problem. We are still getting
permission denied errors when we try to do a mv of a log file inside
a Clearcase view via a Samba share
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:24:10PM -0800, Kathy wrote:
I wanted to post again with the results of using Samba 3.2.8. Looks
like this did not solve our locking problem. We are still getting
permission denied errors when we try to do a mv of a log file inside
a Clearcase view via a Samba share
Thanks, Jeremy and Brian for your responses. First Jeremy -- I think
I will first pursue with Brian a solution that uses a version of Samba
that is at least more in line with what IBM has tested with Clearcase,
but if it really does look like the issue is with Samba, I have no
problem at least
We are having some problems in our company's test group that did not
exist when our Clearcase 2003.06 server existed on a Solaris 8
machine. Now we are running on RHEL 5.2 with Clearcase 7.0.1.3 with
Samba 3.0.28 (despite the fact that IBM has only blessed up to 3.0.24)
and running into some file
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Kathy banshee...@gmail.com wrote:
# first statement is old and may not be obsolete but we still keep it
just in case
oplocks = no
kernel oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
If you have 'oplocks = no', then it doesn't matter what 'kernel oplocks' or
'level2
Thanks for the reply Rob. That was my assumption that oplocks=no
overrides everything (but put them all in there just in case). The
Samba shares are all related to Clearcase, which is why we have
oplocks definitions under global instead of individual shares.
(Although I suppose the home
Based on what Rob said (and what I'm reading about oplocks in the
Using Samba guide), I decided to put the oplocks = no into each
individual share. I won't know until Monday until the test group
tries some test runs if it makes any difference or not. I was
assuming if in global it would be
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:23:57AM -0800, Kathy wrote:
We are having some problems in our company's test group that did not
exist when our Clearcase 2003.06 server existed on a Solaris 8
machine. Now we are running on RHEL 5.2 with Clearcase 7.0.1.3 with
Samba 3.0.28 (despite the fact that
Kathy wrote:
[views]
comment = Flint views
path = /view
read list = @cozcmusr, aramac
write list = @cozcmusr
read only = No
Kathy, I work in ClearCase support, and this construct is not supported
by IBM. It's not a tested configuration. There is a
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:21:56PM -0400, douglas germann wrote:
Jeremy--
Thanks! Had not thought of using smbstatus.
What is happening is that the Ubuntu clients are establishing a lock of
deny_none, and the WinXP client is establishing deny_write.
I have tried changing oplocks and
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:50:42AM +, Doug Germann wrote:
Just upgraded Saturday from Ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04.01. File locking in Samba is
now
broken, meaning two different users can have the same file open at the same
time
and edit it.
Server is RedHat 9.0 running Samba
Just upgraded Saturday from Ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04.01. File locking in Samba is now
broken, meaning two different users can have the same file open at the same time
and edit it.
Server is RedHat 9.0 running Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix. This has been
working well for us for several years. Have
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:46:53AM -, JEFFERY, Stuart wrote:
I have 2 Sun T1000's running Solaris 10 and Sun Cluster 3.2.
They are each connected to a fibre attached SATA RAID array which they
use as data storage area for PC clients.
Both servers are running Samba 3.0.25c.
The problem I
Hi,
I have 2 Sun T1000's running Solaris 10 and Sun Cluster 3.2.
They are each connected to a fibre attached SATA RAID array which they
use as data storage area for PC clients.
Both servers are running Samba 3.0.25c.
The problem I have is that when a PC client access a file via Samba
running on
I think that the CTDB is not relevant to Stuart's problem as described.
This is more relevant:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch05_05.html
There will be other pages too.
echo | testparm -v | grep -i lock
On 05/02/2008, Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:47:28PM +, Quinn Fissler wrote:
I think that the CTDB is not relevant to Stuart's problem as described.
This is more relevant:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch05_05.html
There will be other pages too.
echo | testparm -v | grep -i lock
:-)
Yeah - there must be
On 05/02/2008, Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:47:28PM +, Quinn Fissler wrote:
I think that the CTDB is not relevant to Stuart's problem as described.
This is more relevant:
Yan Seiner wrote:
Hi everyone:
I posted this a couple of weeks ago and got no response. My client is
still stuck with this issue and I am quickly running out of ideas to try.
Does anyone have any ideas/suggestions? This is a long-term customer
and so far their server has provided
Hi everyone:
I posted this a couple of weeks ago and got no response. My client is
still stuck with this issue and I am quickly running out of ideas to try.
Does anyone have any ideas/suggestions? This is a long-term customer
and so far their server has provided outstanding service - until
I have a client with an older server that is running into a weird file
locking problem.
The server is running FC2, samba 3.0.7 and kernel 2.6.10.
They have recently installed AutoDesk Revit, which is apparently some
sort of collaborative design software. Revit keeps a central repository
and
Hi, I'm experiencing similar problems and described them in the list
here
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-January/128794.html
Ute has also had similar problems. We haven't been able to solve the
problem using the oplocks options and are stuck.
Oddly enough the swap file is opened rw
profile acls = Yes
in the [globals] section caused my problem. Removing it solved the
problem.
Thursday, February 22, 2007, 3:31:16 PM, schreef jij:
Hi-
I'm running Samba on OpenSuse10.2 and have shared some drives with
Windows clients. The clients are accessing a bunch of MS Word files
Hi-
I'm running Samba on OpenSuse10.2 and have shared some drives with
Windows clients. The clients are accessing a bunch of MS Word files on
the server and we have experienced a lot of weird file locking
problems.
Sometimes MS Word will open the file as Read-Only which is creating a
bit of a
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 09:31 -0500, Alan Cheers wrote:
Hi-
I'm running Samba on OpenSuse10.2 and have shared some drives with
Windows clients. The clients are accessing a bunch of MS Word files on
the server and we have experienced a lot of weird file locking
problems.
Sometimes MS Word
Hi,
I have a problem, that occurs once a week: when my boss opens some files
with read/write access via vpn over a crappy internet connection and his
connection gets terminated, some files are still locked read-only after
several hours/half a day or more. Only restarting the appropriate smbd
El Domingo, 24 de Diciembre de 2006 00:24, Chris Barnabo escribió:
Beta has no problem reading the files ... but as soon as it has touched
a file in any way, that file is getting locked so that it can no longer
be written from Alpha OR Beta. E.g. if I make a change to index.html,
look at it
I'm encountering a nasty file locking problem on my development system.
The base system is WinXP SP2 (call it Alpha), on which there is a
shared directory (D:\Websites) on NTFS. Running in a M$ Virtual
Machine session on Alpha is an Ubuntu Linux (6.06) system, call it
Beta. Most of the
hi,
i think this is one reason why kernel oplocks has been integrated but
i´m not sure if this always works 100%.
greez
Greg Lehmann wrote:
Hi all,
If I have a linux server running samba for filesharing and I use NFS to
make these shares available on another linux server that also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2006 12:49 AM, Greg Lehmann escreveu:
Hi all,
If I have a linux server running samba for filesharing and I use NFS to
make these shares available on another linux server that also runs samba
to share the same shares will the locking
Hi all,
If I have a linux server running samba for filesharing and I use NFS to
make these shares available on another linux server that also runs samba
to share the same shares will the locking still work properly?
I can use this to get around an issue with multiple authentication
Hi.
I have a problem saving 1 file by 2 users via Samba from Linux pc to
Win server. File after 1user opening doesn't lock.
The situtation is:
I have Linux /WIN network. File server ir WIN. When somebody edits
file xx.xls with OpenOffice via Samba, and another user edits the same
file after 5
I've a situation where file locking does not seem to functioning. I have
the following entries in my smb.conf file:
*** /etc/samba/smb.conf ***
linux # testparm -v | grep lock
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
snip
Warning: Service printers defines a print command, but print
I have a new share setup that I would like to do some pretty simple
things with. I would like to have multiple people connect to it.
Everyone can read and write to it but the only creator of a given file
can delete that file. Also, when a given file (say Word, Quark or
Photoshop docs) is open
I am sure this is a subject which has been discussed a lot already. I have
been looking for pointers but have failed. So please bear with me and help.
A linux box runs Samba and is connected to a win box. One word or excel file
is opened simultaneoulsy on both (on the linux system in OpenOffice
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:33:30AM +0530, Pramathesh Ambasta wrote:
I am sure this is a subject which has been discussed a lot already. I have
been looking for pointers but have failed. So please bear with me and help.
A linux box runs Samba and is connected to a win box. One word or excel
I have been writing some code to perform portable file locking between Linux
and Windows. On Windows I use UnlockFileEx() and Linux fcntl(). To get over
the incompatibilites between these calls, I use the calls to lock the first
two bytes of the file with a read lock. The first byte is regarded
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:13:33PM +0200, malcolm wrote:
I have been writing some code to perform portable file locking between Linux
and Windows. On Windows I use UnlockFileEx() and Linux fcntl(). To get over
the incompatibilites between these calls, I use the calls to lock the first
two
Hi all
I am new on the list and i subscribe it do try to solve a problem that i am
having with samba and file locking. Last week we changed from DreamWaver to
NVU, the DreamWaver implements file locking but the NVU dont. What started
to happen is that two users can edit the same file, the
Hi
I have a Samba Server on RH9 and when I map the shares on Windows client
computers, the files are locked so the users do not accidentally overwrite
other people's files on the network. (This is the good news)
However, the Linux client computers use smbmount to map the shares within
their
Hi everyone,
like Jeremy wanted, I got a lvl. 10 log from two clients opening the same file.
The log is attached to this eMail (I have just bzipped it to reduce its size).
Thanks in advance for looking over it :)
Ulrik Guenther
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
Hello everyone,
I have a 50-client Samba installation here (version of Samba is 3.0.12). The
problem is, that files are not locked correctly. The scenario is the following:
1. User A opens a word document file and edits it
2. User B tries to open the same file, too
3. Instead of getting a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:38:59PM +0100, Ulrik Guenther wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a 50-client Samba installation here (version of Samba is 3.0.12). The
problem is, that files are not locked correctly. The scenario is the
following:
1. User A opens a word document file and edits it
Is file locking dependent on the editor or we can control it via the
oplocks option? here's the scenario: I usually use vi from the
console. However, some of my colleagues might work on the same file
from the windows machine using notepad, Jedit, dreamweaver etc. What
is the best way to lock
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:15:42PM -0600, sharif islam wrote:
Is file locking dependent on the editor or we can control it via the
oplocks option? here's the scenario: I usually use vi from the
console. However, some of my colleagues might work on the same file
from the windows machine using
,
dreamweaver etc?
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: March 4, 2005 1:20 PM
To: sharif islam
Cc: samba mailing list
Subject: Re: [Samba] file locking
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:15:42PM -0600, sharif islam wrote
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:23:31PM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
What about editors like Joe - when I run it on two terminals to access the
same file, the second (and subsequent attempts) show read only...
Admittedly that's probably FILE locking - not more granular like region
based etc - but
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:23:31 -0800, Mitch (WebCob) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about editors like Joe - when I run it on two terminals to access the
same file, the second (and subsequent attempts) show read only...
Admittedly that's probably FILE locking - not more granular like region
I think this is editor specific. I get the same warning in vi if I
open the same file in vi. But say if I open one in vi then in gedit,
the latter doesn't warn me. But If I change something in gedit and go
back to vi, vi warns me that the file has been changed since
reading!
[Mitch says:]
I am having problems with storing Peachtree Complete Accounting on a Samba
share. I know people have reported issues like this before but I have yet to
see a solution.
Is there anyone here who has successfully set this up (without getting the lock
errors)? Any help would be greatly
Information on this seems sketchy.
I have samba 2.2 on RHEL 2.1. I have two clients (written in Java using a
1.4.2 JDK). The clients try to lock the same file with an exclusive lock.
Both clients always succeed, i.e. locking doesn't seem to work. I have
oplocks turned off on the share and
Hi,
I m using Samba 3.0.4. The problem is the if user1 created his file in
the Public directory, the new file has the user name of user1 with
permission 770 on the new file.
User2 can read and write to the file as well, but it doesn't change the
ownership of the new file. After the new file has
Hi,
I don't know how to enable file sharing and locking capability in Samba
3.0.7.
I m using FreeBSD 5.3 RC. I will be very appreciate for your help.
Here is my conf file:
[global]
workgroup = AUTHTEC
netbios name = SAMBA30
server string = Samba Server
password server
Hi
In my enterprise we have our php web projects in a Linux server.
We are using Samba shared folders to access the source code. The problem
that I'm having is that I need a mechanism to control de access of the files
so that 2 developers working on the same project can't open the
that two people are actually working on the same
problem, at the same time, in the same file.
-=Chris
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Bottarini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] File Locking
Hi
In my
Hello,
I have a problem and haven't been able to figure it out yet. I was
running a test of an upload mechanism the product my company makes uses.
The idea is that users can upload files to a share, and we
process/archive those files when they have been added. It would try to
detect if a
Hello,
System: Solaris 8/9
Samba: 3.02 and 3.06
We have problems with accessing files (from Windows XP) on a samba server
that are mounted over nfs (on the server). Some users have symlinks in
their home directories to nfs resources. When they try to copy file
located in nfs the client simply
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 03:12:55PM +0200, Andreas Haupt wrote:
[2004/09/16 10:04:15, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705)
diapp2 (134.30.6.13) connect to service dbi initially as user dbi
(uid=1250, gid=11211) (pid 29469)
[2004/09/16 10:04:47, 0]
H. I've been following an smbpasswd locking problem over NFS (on AIX
5.2 ML04 - Samba 3.0.7) that appears to be F_SETLKW64 related as well when
I'm trying to join a machine to a domain or when a workstations tries to
actively change it's trust after 7 days. It's intermittent and doesn't
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 02:15:38PM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
H. I've been following an smbpasswd locking problem over NFS (on AIX
5.2 ML04 - Samba 3.0.7) that appears to be F_SETLKW64 related as well when
I'm trying to join a machine to a domain or when a workstations tries to
Dear list,
My system administrator at office runs a SMB server for us all to
share files at smb://server/share/ , on which we share mainly MS
Office/OpenOffice.org documents. I have recently switched to iBook G4 with
Panther. After the switching, I can connect to the SMB server using
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 01:56:31AM +0800, Wan Yeok Seng wrote:
But if I use openoffice (in a fedora core workstation) to access the
file in the share first, when I type smbstatus, I am getting a deny none
(readwrite) which is not the intended way. If I open the file from other
workstation
Hi there,
I am facing some file locking problem with samba. Below are the
environment :
OS : Fedora Core 1
Samba version : 3.0.0-15
I have used security = share, oplocks =no, level2 oplocks=no, locking =
yes, strict locking = yes. The detail of the smb.conf can be provided.
The situation is
This may be what you need in your smb.conf:
oplocks = no
level 2 oplocks = no
Look them up via 'man smb.conf'. I believe you can set it either globally or per
share.
Hope that helps :-)
Cameron B. Prince said:
Hi,
I have a situation in the office where I temporarily need to provide
Hi,
I have a situation in the office where I temporarily need to provide
additional clients access to a share on a Windows 2000 Professional box.
2000 Pro seems to only allow 5 clients to connect to a share and there is no
faclity to allow more as best I can tell. Upgrading isn't really an option
I don't know what kind of programm you're running, but I had nearly the
problem. I solved it by turning of the oplocks for this share.
Try in the share:
[C]
comment = C On Doveserver
path = /mnt/samba
public = yes
writable = yes
create mask = 0775
Hi Sascha,
You nailed it... My problem is solved. I don't understand why that would be
desired behavior, but regardless, it's fixed now.
Thank you very much,
Cameron
I don't know what kind of programm you're running, but I had
nearly the problem. I solved it by turning of the oplocks for
I'm using samba, and I have multiple OS's accessing files, including a program on the
server itself. When the file is being sent over samba, I want it to be locked so the
server's program can't read it. Once transfer is complete, it releases the lock and
the server can read it. Likewise, I
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Robert McIntosh wrote:
Hi,
I'm running smbd 2.2.8. I'm a little green when it comes to file locking
with samba.
Are you from Mars by any chance? Isn't that where green people come from?
Oh, I forgot, you could be Irish also.
I have two users that access a single data
scully the truth is out there lol
- Original Message -
From: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] File Locking
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Robert McIntosh wrote:
Hi
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
