Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-29 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Markus Schabel wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: Depending on how you also use LDAP, there are some good reasons to move to 3.0. In HEAD, pdb_ldap now has connection caching, and does not modify unchanged attributes (these benefits provided by metze, who

RE: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-29 Thread David Brodbeck
Will there be a 2.2.6a release to fix the file descriptor leak bug that was recently patched? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-29 Thread jra
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:55:43AM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote: Will there be a 2.2.6a release to fix the file descriptor leak bug that was recently patched? Probably. I'm talking with Jerry about it. The problem is there's no admin parameter to turn off kernel change notify on Linux so you

[Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread William Jojo
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list go

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread John H Terpstra
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread Markus Schabel
John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) We hope that this will be our last

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread Chris Tooley
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) :-) We

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread John H Terpstra
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. ^^ latest != last

Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

2002-10-28 Thread Markus Schabel
Andrew Bartlett wrote: Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will

[Samba] Samba 2.2.6 (final) RPMS released for Mandrake Linux 8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and 9.0

2002-10-17 Thread Sylvestre Taburet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] and myself [EMAIL PROTECTED] are proud to present to you the latest RPMs for samba-2.2.6, compiled for Mandrake Linux 8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and 9.0 platforms, with or without LDAP. We would like to thank the samba