Just been told the config file didn't appear in the email as it went out
(even though it certainly appears in the copy I've got), so I'm attaching
inline this time.
Oh, BTW: it's version 3.4.7 on Debian Lenny, installed from backports.
[global]
workgroup = U4EATECH
netbios name
Hi,
I'm not entirely happy with the performance I'm seeing using Samba, and I
wonder if anyone can shine any light.
The server is a Dell PowerEdge 2950 with hardware RAID10, 4GB RAM and a
quad-core Intel Xeon processor. It's not live yet, so there's no load from
other tasks.
I've already
Hi all,
We're experiencing performance issues after migrating from 3.0.8 to 3.0.28.
Write performance has degraded about 30%, regardless of the size of file
being copied. (tests described below are a single 150Mb file copy from an XP
explorer)
The setup is somewhat peculiar as the server is
Thank you both for your replies.
I can't guarantee that this will solve your problem, but since you
mention that you've replaced a server, there's a good chance that there
are some stale invalid shortcuts lying around. It could be that
Windows periodically is going out there looking for
List,
I apologize for the newbie nature of this post; I am sure there is
an easy answer somewhere, but I've tried all the search terms I can
think up and can't find it.
I have some video archived on a White Box 4 machine. I watch it on a
Windows XP box in the other room by mapping a drive to a
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:08:33AM -0700, Ryan Wright wrote:
List,
I apologize for the newbie nature of this post; I am sure there is
an easy answer somewhere, but I've tried all the search terms I can
think up and can't find it.
I have some video archived on a White Box 4 machine. I
I have seen performance issues where a Windows client (Explorer) takes a
while to display a file listing on a remote computer, but then it
accesses it just fine. Generally speaking, this is the opposite of what
you describe, but it could be related.
In investigating this, the problem (not the
El Miércoles, 24 de Noviembre de 2004 11:30, escribió:
Are you sure it is samba who is causing delays and not the file system?
No, you are right. I will try to change the file system from EXT3 to REISER.
What file system are you using? Is the second access to a file as slow as
the first?
No,
We're running samba in our organization to serve files in a LAN to windows
machines (almost XP), and we're having some performance issues with small
files. With big files (ie, ISO images), it works pretty well. But, when small
files are involved in the transference, problems arise. In the same
Isaac Ojeda Llebry wrote:
We're running samba in our organization to serve files in a LAN to windows
machines (almost XP), and we're having some performance issues with small
files. With big files (ie, ISO images), it works pretty well. But, when small
files are involved in the transference,
Hi,
I've noticed this type of issue has been raised a few times, but I
haven't been able to find a solution yet.
I'm having transfer performance issues from various clients to my new
file server :
Server config is :
Athlon 3200+ on Nforce 2
Yukon Gb NIC
Gentoo with 2.6.9
samba
Dimitar Vassilev wrote:
Read the links and adjust your values accordingly. I haven't been able to
implement all options, but I have a similar problem on 10/100mbit net with
a
slack 10/2.6.8 kernel. The tips on netbios over tcp and computer browser
were
given me by my net admin. The rest I googled
Now I have built the RAID into the other machine with 700 MHz Celeron and
the same GBit card. This Machine has also 384 MB of RAM, so this is upgraded
too.
The output of Bonnie tested on the Raid looks like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bonnie]# ./Bonnie
File './Bonnie.2324', size: 104857600
Writing with
Hi.
I have 2 PC's connected with 1GBit NIC's. When I transfer a file from my
File-Server(Redhat9.0, 256 SD-RAM, 300MHz PII, RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital WD200JB
RAID 0) to my Windows-PC(AMD Athlon XP 1800+, 1024 MB DDR-RAM, WINXP PRO, RTL8169 NIC,
2x Western Digital WD080JB RAID 0) with
Steffen Timmermann schrieb:
I have 2 PC's connected with 1GBit NIC's.
When I transfer a file from my File-Server
(Redhat9.0, 256 SD-RAM, 300MHz PII, RTL8169 NIC,
What Chipset? Maybe Intel BX? The at this time common Harddisk Interface
can't read faster than about 9MB per second.
If you use a
: 64 MB in 1.55 seconds = 41.29 MB/sec
- Original Message -
From: Dimitar Vassilev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Holger Krull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steffen Timmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sambaliste
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Performance Issues
Hi Steffen
At first: Thanks for the response.
Here are the performance Measures of my Harddisks in the Server. As the
Harddisks are not connected to the Onboard IDE, they're not limited to
9
MB/sec
/dev/sdb is the RAID 0, Connected to the PCI Raid Controller Card. The
only
Share Samba provides
Hello, we are using a Samba server (3.0.2a) here at work. It's running on a dual
1.4ghz opteron with two 250gig HD. Everything seems to be running fine except for
AutoCad (which is the main program we run). Any time we try to save it can take up to
10 seconds, or each time we try to print it
Have you tried dissabling the firewall just to test?
/R
Brian Merrell wrote:
Hello, we are using a Samba server (3.0.2a) here at work. It's running on a dual
1.4ghz opteron with two 250gig HD. Everything seems to be running fine except for
AutoCad (which is the main program we run). Any time
Have you tried deadtime = 15 or similar in your smb.conf?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Le Noury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 March, 2003 7:31 AM
To: Samba (E-mail)
Subject: [Samba] performance issues
Hi,
I have compiled and am running samba version 2.2.7.a on Redhat
Hi,
I have compiled and am running samba version 2.2.7.a on Redhat linux 7.3. I
am having some performance issues with it and was wondering if I was doing
something wrong.
I have noticed that if I use samba in security = server mode, every time a
new connection is made to the server from the
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vinay Kudithipudi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:57:17PM -0500, Vinay Kudithipudi wrote:
Hello Guys,
I am having some problems
Hello Guys,
I am having some problems with configuring SAMBA with regards to
performance. We are running SAMBA 2.2.3a on Dual PIII 1Ghz machines with
512MB of RAM. The server is running on a default server installation of Red
Hat 7.2. We have a 500Gb RAID 5 drive using the Promise SX6000 Raid
how are u measuring read and write speeds?
-Original Message-
From: Vinay Kudithipudi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
Hello Guys,
I am having some problems with configuring SAMBA
Technologies Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:13 PM
To: 'Vinay Kudithipudi'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
how are u measuring read and write speeds?
-Original
so are you using xcopy or copy dos command in your script?
-Original Message-
From: Vinay Kudithipudi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:21 PM
To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
Javid,
I am running
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:57:17PM -0500, Vinay Kudithipudi wrote:
Hello Guys,
I am having some problems with configuring SAMBA with regards to
performance. We are running SAMBA 2.2.3a on Dual PIII 1Ghz machines with
512MB of RAM. The server is running on a default server installation of
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:57:17PM -0500, Vinay Kudithipudi wrote:
===SMB.CONF===
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
netbios name = {HOSTNAME}
wins server = {WINSSERVER}
server string = {HOSTNAME}
security = SHARE
encrypt passwords = Yes
log file =
be the cause here.
Vinay Kudithipudi
Associate Network Operations Engineer
Spirian Technologies Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Vinay Kudithipudi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:50:49PM -0500, Vinay Kudithipudi wrote:
Jay - I tried the test without any options (i.e. all default) and still get
the same results
Javid - I am using copy
Jeremy - All clients are Win2k or WinXP.
I would very much like to blame the hardware for the problem,
Hi all
We are implementing samba-ldap to act as an nt pdc and are seeing
performance problems.
We have a 1ghz, 3gb Ram, 36gb box that is running samba-2.2.5 and
openldap-2.0.23 under redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3.
Clients are all Win2k SP3.
All the ldap requests are to the localhost
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 15:57, John Coston wrote:
12:46pm up 2 days, 17:14, 3 users, load average: 20.24, 20.26, 20.51
129 processes: 106 sleeping, 23 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 36.1% user, 63.8% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle
Mem: 3229040K av, 3166372K used, 62668K free,
it's software RAID-1 using two fast wide scsi 36 gb discs. Filesystem
is ext3. We have one 30gb partition for share data, and the rest is for
system and swap.
here is some of output from dmesg:
md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
...
scsi0 :
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, John Coston wrote:
it's software RAID-1 using two fast wide scsi 36 gb discs. Filesystem
is ext3. We have one 30gb partition for share data, and the rest is for
system and swap.
here is some of output from dmesg:
md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
here is the output of vmstat, iostat, and uname:
[root@foo root]# vmstat 1
procs memoryswap io system
cpu
r b w swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us
sy id
21 0 1 0 61384 148780 2763956 0 0 2
sorry - the last iostat result is from another execution of the command
(without the 1), not from the looping output.
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 02:22 PM, John Coston wrote:
here is the output of vmstat, iostat, and uname:
[root@foo root]# vmstat 1
procs
Sorry for the confusion - if I run iostat I get this:
[root@foo root]# iostat
Linux 2.4.18-3 (foo) 09/24/2002
avg-cpu: %user %nice%sys %idle
16.790.00 26.39 56.82
Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
dev8-0 11.80
On 24 Sep 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
probably you want to run the iostat 1 during heavier load...
however the summary result does look funny to me...
On my system we have ~ 1:1 ratio of reads to writes
you have a ~ 1:200 ratio of reads to writes.
Does that make sense in your
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 18:19, John Coston wrote:
some output from ps wauxf:
for smbd, all the processes are around this value:
parky 1963 3.5 0.1 7488 3452 ?R07:37 15:41 \_ smbd
-D
for ldap, all of the processes are around this value:
ldap 6150 0.0 0.1 75548
Hi,
I'm rather interested in the outcome of this on or off the list; but I
suspect there will be other people on the list who are interested -
please keep posting to the list :-)
I think we have very similar HW. We have a dual CPU (1.4G PIII) LPr2000
netserver with 10k and 15k drives. We
40 matches
Mail list logo
