Doug Tucker wrote:
From the man
pages, it looks like I can set the share to read only, and use the
directive write list = @groupname to allow certain users write access
to this read only share, but, I don't want to allow everyone read
access, I want to only allow certain other users
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of users
read only
Doug Tucker wrote:
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to
Hi,
I am relatively new to Samba although I've installed it and used it before my
knowledge is very shallow.
Environment:
Samba version is: 3.0.21a
Platform: Sun X4200 M2, AMD Opteron running Solaris 10
Client: Windows Vista
Situation:
I am trying to allow a user to copy folders from her
Gripe session: (Ignore this if you don't have time or don't care)
I originally had planned to allow the user to have 2 mount points on the same
server using different logins. Didn't realize that SMB protocol allows only
one login to the server at a time. What is up with that?
This is a
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 12:16 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
Gripe session: (Ignore this if you don't have time or don't care)
I originally had planned to allow the user to have 2 mount points on the
same server using different logins. Didn't realize that SMB protocol
allows only one
,
Robert
- Original Message -
From: simo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Robert Pollard [EMAIL PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Permissions issue -- cannot delete a folder/file
On Wed, 2008-01-23
Hi,
We have a problem with Samba 3.0.27a running on Solaris 9.
When it was initially installed it worked but now does not.
The symptoms are that by default files are created with everyone full
control but when you attempt to change this to read and execute it does
not error but when you click
Hi Travis,
I and a few others have been having similar problems in
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-January/128794.html and
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-February/129778.html
Have you found any solution yet?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
It turns out that
profile acls = Yes
in the [globals] section caused my problem. Removing it solved the
problem.
Monday, February 26, 2007, 11:01:42 AM, schreef jij:
Hi Travis,
I and a few others have been having similar problems in
OK. Everything is going great for 4 years on my FC3 Samba Version 3.0.3-5.
Now all of a sudden, when someone opens a Word/Excel file on a Samba share, it
changes the user Owner to that user as well as modifies the permissions to r-x
and leaves the group/permission bits/owner setting alone.
I
What about using some of the following (example) directives? These can
be defined per share:
force create mode = 664
create mask = 664
force directory mode = 2775
directory mask = 2775
force security mode = 664
security mask = 664
force directory security mode = 2775
directory security
Travis Bullock wrote:
OK. Everything is going great for 4 years on my FC3 Samba Version 3.0.3-5.
Now all of a sudden, when someone opens a Word/Excel file on a Samba
share, it changes the user Owner to that user as well as modifies the
permissions to r-x and leaves the group/permission
Happened to my SAMBA? Permissions Issue
What about using some of the following (example) directives? These can
be defined per share:
force create mode = 664
create mask = 664
force directory mode = 2775
directory mask = 2775
force security mode = 664
security mask = 664
force directory
Travis Bullock wrote:
Nope...nadda..
No yums, no new client O/S's.nada
You're sure there were no new Windows Critical Updates or MS Office
updates that might have been applied automatically that might have done
something?
Sorry, but it just doesn't make sense that something can
The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels
recently *crycry* Now my shares that were mounted via smbfs have to be
mounted via cifs. cifs is, apparantly, not a drop-in replacement for
smbfs however, as it behaves differnetly with the same configuration
options.
Indeed, it
I've tried some internet and list searching, but I haven't been able to
find anybody with the same issue. It's hard to search for samba cifs
force user problem because it hits nearly every samba tech support
question ever asked.
The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels
Hi Reinhard,
No, I'm using Solaris 8 and only files and nis, no ldap. I read
through the bug you mentioned, but my problem seems only to effect
specific users and their secondary groups.
I use a username map file to convert windows user names to unix user
names. I have made the assumption that
More info. I have compiled the same samba for Linux and it seems to work
fine via that with that same network settings (unfortunately, I don't
have a Linux box dedicated as a server... yet!). Anyway, that does make
it look like a Solaris bug.
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 10:05, Nick THOMPSON wrote:
Hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick THOMPSON wrote:
| More info. I have compiled the same samba for Linux
| and it seems to work fine via that with that same
| network settings (unfortunately, I don't have a
| Linux box dedicated as a server... yet!). Anyway,
| that does make it
Are you both members of the same unix group?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
THOMPSON
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 7:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Permissions issue 3.0.2a
Hi,
I have two users (one is me
Hi all,
I have several UNIX servers I'd like to configure Samba on but am having trouble
working out the best way to achieve consistent user and group permission across the
file systems on several file servers.
Basically I need to integrate the Samba server into our MS AD domain, using Kerberos
23 matches
Mail list logo
