Stephen Carville wrote:
After considerable experimentation I'm forced to accept that Samba 3 has
problems with the combination of being a domain member, the 2.6 kernel,
and Dell 2850 hardware.
WORKSFORME, RHEL4, samba-3.0.20a, DELL Poweredge SC420.
-- Rex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephen Carville wrote:
After considerable experimentation I'm forced to accept that Samba 3 has
problems with the combination of being a domain member, the 2.6 kernel,
and Dell 2850 hardware.
WORKSFORME, RHEL4, samba-3.0.20a, DELL Poweredge SC420.
Highest revision
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:14:17PM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephen Carville wrote:
After considerable experimentation I'm forced to accept that Samba 3 has
problems with the combination of being a domain member, the 2.6 kernel,
and Dell 2850 hardware.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Carville a écrit :
Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephen Carville wrote:
After considerable experimentation I'm forced to accept that
Samba 3 has problems with the combination of being a domain
member, the 2.6 kernel, and Dell 2850 hardware.
Stéphane Purnelle wrote:
Just a comment :
With RHEL4, seLinux is activate by default.
Could you verify if is not the same problem with Fedora Core 4 and samba.
Good idea -- also first thing I checked :-) I made sure
SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config
--
Stephen Carville -- polluting
