On Wed, 29 May 2002 08:51:06 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
[...]
Compiling smbd/quotas.c
smbd/quotas.c: In function `get_smb_linux_vfs_quota':
smbd/quotas.c:111: storage size of `D' isn't known
make[1]: *** [smbd/quotas.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/samba-2.2.4/source'
make:
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:23:05PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok I see. What alternative do you propose for Samba ? Should
we just disable quota support on Linux and tell people to use
an OS with real quota support ? This would not be good for many
of our users.
That's one option - you'll
Hello,
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:51:06AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
Known problem, with no fix yet AFAIK. It is not really related to
XFS at all, you're tripping it in XFS because we include some quite
recent quota patches in the XFS CVS trees (ie. the patches that've
just
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:17:02AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The other option would be to just copy the quota headers from the
Linux quota package instead of relying on changing kernels.
This is not a viable solution (IMHO). Some kernels (the Linus
ones) just have broken 32 bit uid
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:18:47PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
When I was implementing user space tools handling quota I was thinking
where to get the headers and finally I decided that having own local
include is the easiest way (this way quota tools are able to handle all
existing kernels
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:47:45AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
If you have such an include file that works across all distributions
and kernels please post it.
I already told you that is is part of Jan's quota tools.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:48:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:47:45AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
If you have such an include file that works across all distributions
and kernels please post it.
I already told you that is is part of Jan's quota tools.
If
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:17:17PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
If this is the magic include file that is guarenteed to
work across all Linux distributions and kernels why isn't
in in /usr/include/quota.h ?
Glibc politics :P
You must understand I don't care about the glibc or Linux
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:45:07PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Is this constructive enough?
Much more so - thanks ! :-). I'll look at merging this in for
2.2.5. I may move around some of the header locations (we normally
keep all include files in include/, or at least that's the plan :-),
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:56:44PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:45:07PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Is this constructive enough?
Much more so - thanks ! :-). I'll look at merging this in for
2.2.5. I may move around some of the header locations (we normally
Here's a better patch - it also handles another linux quota interface
that samba didn't yet handle at all..
Yikes, that was still borked.
diff -uNr samba-2.2.4/source/configure.in samba-2.2.4-hch/source/configure.in
--- samba-2.2.4/source/configure.in Fri May 3 03:02:46 2002
+++
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:59:33PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
Hi there,
hey Ralf.
sorry for being semi-off-topic, but since this has at least *soemthing* to do
with XFS I hope you forgive me. :-)
I'm trying to compile Samba 2.2.4 under Debian 2.2 (stable). I'm running a
kernel
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:51:06AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
Known problem, with no fix yet AFAIK. It is not really related to
XFS at all, you're tripping it in XFS because we include some quite
recent quota patches in the XFS CVS trees (ie. the patches that've
just recently gone into
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:04:47PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Why should we have to have a local quota header file ? Why can't
it work on Linux like every other UNIX system - we don't need a
local quota.h for them ?
This is not a Samba problem IMHO., but a Linux one.
Samba is including
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:04:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Samba is including Kernel headers. That is a Samaba problem.
Ok I see. What alternative do you propose for Samba ? Should
we just disable quota support on Linux and tell people to use
an OS with real quota support ? This
hi Jeremy,
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:04:47PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:51:06AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
Known problem, with no fix yet AFAIK. It is not really related to
XFS at all, you're tripping it in XFS because we include some quite
recent quota
16 matches
Mail list logo
