hi jeremy,
my problem is, i made it on a production environment with over 100
workstations on our 3 campus and i have not a test environment. i
can make it only during a nightshift, our user are evil, thankless and
m$ fans ;)))
if you need this information/log output for help and to avoid m$ here,
no, it doesnt work :( i tested it with:
samba-3.0.11-acl (still broken, fails after some try's to save an excel
file)
samba-3.0.13-acl (still broken, same behavior )
samba-3.0.13-noacl (seems to work)
always the same violation error thing in excel with acl's and filetimes
param.
cheers tom
On
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:55:56AM +0200, Thomas Werner wrote:
no, it doesnt work :( i tested it with:
samba-3.0.11-acl (still broken, fails after some try's to save an excel
file)
samba-3.0.13-acl (still broken, same behavior )
samba-3.0.13-noacl (seems to work)
always the same
Jeremy or Nathan,
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, I have a working theory for this. It concerns ACLs and what
happens when excel wants to update the filetime on a file the user
doesn't own.
Normally you just set the dos filetime parameter to allow this
(this causes a timestamp to be updated on a
/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Urs
Rau
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:01 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Re: Problems with Excel MS Word files (still)
Jeremy or Nathan,
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, I have a working theory
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:01:10AM +0100, Urs Rau wrote:
Jeremy or Nathan,
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, I have a working theory for this. It concerns ACLs and what
happens when excel wants to update the filetime on a file the user
doesn't own.
Normally you just set the dos filetime
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
No confirmation over here, havn't had a chance to compile a new copy -
rolled back to 3.0.8 for the time being it's been less buggy but still have
occasional file(s) locking up.
A little unclear here, do I need to add a patch
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
No confirmation over here, havn't had a chance to compile a new copy -
rolled back to 3.0.8 for the time being it's been less buggy but still have
occasional file(s) locking up.
A little unclear here, do I need
