-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Which I find unfortunate as you end up using the username that Windows
provides, not the username the person actually gets (if I'm not mistaken).
Andreas Ladanyi wrote:
| The answer is to use %U instead %u (from the old smb.conf) then
| everything
Hi,
i read FOR EXAMPLE if i have a share:
/home/%U
the directory structure:
/home/DOMAION/username
have to be available.
In (debian) samba 3.0.24 /home/%U without DOMAIN was possible, however.
I setup sernet Samba 3.0.31 and i have to add the DOMAINNAME.
If i setup /home/%D/%U then the
The answer is to use %U instead %u (from the old smb.conf) then
everything work :-)
Andreas Ladanyi schrieb:
Hi,
smbclient i60ws1\\public_html -U ladanyi
results in:
[2008/08/17 10:43:10, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(1003)
'/var/www/public_html/IPR-OFFICE/ladanyi' does not
Hello
1.
OK, after searching, I found that openldap is a single master model.
http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1240.html
I think it will not change in foreseeable future.
In my previous mail, I said the ldap servers may be out of sync.
But actually, under Openldap 2.3, it will not be the
Correction there:
Corrected:
Slave ldap server is required to add the 'updateref' directive which
tell others to make changes to other server(the master ldap server). It
cannot make changes to the current replica.
--- Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
1.
OK, after searching, I
OK, after searching, I found that openldap is a single master model.
http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1240.html
I think it will not change in foreseeable future.
'multi-master' is in 2.4.x And most sites don't need multimaster
anyway, although many think they do.
Just setup the
On 9/4/06, simo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 17:29 +0200, Franz Pfoertsch wrote:
You are right!
but there is no link from www.samba.org to the wiki, so it is only a hidden
side.
The developers didn't use the wiki.
This is not true, but we can probably use it more, I
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 07:41 -0500, Deryck Hodge wrote:
On 9/4/06, simo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that many looks at it, maybe we should make it more visible.
Deryck,
what do you think?
Yes, it needs a link from samba.org. I think that would be enough.
I'll grab that now.
You are right!
but there is no link from www.samba.org to the wiki, so it is only a hidden
side.
The developers didn't use the wiki.
the article about clustering is great, we need some more of stuff like this.
I think about a page about the smb.conf, but it makes no sence when the
developer
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 17:29 +0200, Franz Pfoertsch wrote:
You are right!
but there is no link from www.samba.org to the wiki, so it is only a hidden
side.
The developers didn't use the wiki.
This is not true, but we can probably use it more, I agree on this.
the article about clustering
Adam Nielsen wrote:
I don't even need browsing, so if there is a way to get this to work
just so I can use net use ... on Win2k this will do.
Assuming you can ping both machines from each other (i.e. routing is
working correctly) then you can just connect via IP, e.g.
net view
Fawzib Rojas wrote:
I want to only allow access to a certain group 'Domain Power Users', so
it seems I have to do the following:
a) wbinfo -name-to-sid=domain power users, which gives me the
group's SID
b) add the parameter 'require_membership_of=SID'
c) restart samba
pam_winbind
Il 23/12/2004, alle ore 18:28, Adam Tauno Williams ha scritto:
The connections have been idled out, this is normal Windows 2000
behaviour. There are many articles about changing the value or
disabling the 'feature'
This can be changed or disabled only in Windows servers, AFAIK, which
indeed
Marco De Vitis írta:
Il 23/12/2004, alle ore 18:28, Adam Tauno Williams ha scritto:
The connections have been idled out, this is normal Windows 2000
behaviour. There are many articles about changing the value or
disabling the 'feature'
This can be changed or disabled only in Windows
Richmond Dyes wrote:
I have been setting up my domain server using FC2 and samba 3.0.9. First
thing, for your information: In the notations in several sources, it
tells you to user logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u this is wrong. It
should be, logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U. Now that I spent 5
Hi John,
Thanks for the clarification! How often does smbd check the file's
time/date signiture? Everytime when a request needs to be transferred over?
Thanks!
Yimin
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2004 18:54, Yimin Chen wrote:
Hi,
I saw the following documentation regarding how
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 10:29, Yimin Chen wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for the clarification! How often does smbd check the file's
time/date signiture? Everytime when a request needs to be transferred over?
If I recall, every 20 seconds or so. Check the sources - its all in the
sources Luke.
Dear Listmembers,
apparently my attachement was not distributed via the list, therefore I add
it once again to this email; plain text following my question. Many thanks
for any suggestion in advance:
I am using a SPARC ULTRA 60 / running SuSE sparc linux 7.3 as server for our
M$-Network. I
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:38:46AM -0300, Mohamed Elbeshti wrote:
Hi Jeremy
How r u ?
I found in the server box samba ver 2.0.7 running with RH6.2 -kerenel
2.2.14-. Is it possible to upgrade the old version samba to samba 2.2.0
or higher?
Yes this should be possible if you compile from
I've never done this but I do have some leads for you.
If you open the user in directory_administrator you will find a checkbox
that is pertinent. ;-)
Also I assume that you will require a poplulated ou=Hosts in accordance
with http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/ldap-auth.php and of course
20 matches
Mail list logo
