Charles Marcus wrote:
Mark Rutherford wrote:
Have you tried changing 'socket options' in your smb.conf file?
You may need to tune that for your setup, it does make a difference
at least in a system with 1 NIC in it.
However, I have no experience with bonding and Samba.
Actually, with the
Eric Bambach wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Mark Rutherford wrote:
Have you tried changing 'socket options' in your smb.conf file?
You may need to tune that for your setup, it does make a difference
at least in a system with 1 NIC in it.
However, I have no experience with bonding and Samba.
Mark Rutherford wrote:
Have you tried changing 'socket options' in your smb.conf file?
You may need to tune that for your setup, it does make a difference at
least in a system with 1 NIC in it.
However, I have no experience with bonding and Samba.
Actually, with the newer 2.6 kernels, it is
Hello,
Please CC replies I'm not subscribed.
Performance with samba and only samba degrades terribly when we use
the bonding driver to aggregate two ethernet cards. Instead of a steady
file copy it seems to go in spurts. If I pull out one of the network
cables (doesn't matter which)
Have you tried changing 'socket options' in your smb.conf file?
You may need to tune that for your setup, it does make a difference at
least in a system with 1 NIC in it.
However, I have no experience with bonding and Samba.
Eric Bambach wrote:
Hello,
Please CC replies I'm not subscribed.
