On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:41:32PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 04:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 03:42:25PM +1000, taso wrote:
I don't know if a Win32 Samba client is feasible because I don't
know enough about client-side Win32
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 03:42:25PM +1000, taso wrote:
I don't know if a Win32 Samba client is feasible because I don't
know enough about client-side Win32 networking. Does the list
have any opinions/comments?
This is something we've discussed at the CIFS conferences.
Take a look at the AFS
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 04:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 03:42:25PM +1000, taso wrote:
I don't know if a Win32 Samba client is feasible because I don't
know enough about client-side Win32 networking. Does the list
have any opinions/comments?
This is something
On the face of it may sound like a useless thing to have, but a Win32
Samba client does have some merit. It would make the Samba server
safe from sabotage by gratuitous protocol changes, and it opens the
door to making performance improvements.
I see the Samba win32 client sitting alongside
