So far, bugs 2072 and 2140 have reported this condition. I was wondering
if there was any movement on it. I know Richard Allen, author of 2140 and
apparently the patch to bug 1065, had said he'd do some work on it. My
fix for now has been ripping the #ifdef's out of config.h, but I still
get a
Any comments on this one? Shall I submit a bug?
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On
I recently downloaded and installed v3.0.8 and installed it on HP-UX
11.11. Thankfully, all of the compile problems I reported in 3.0.2 are now
gone (not sure why no one ever acknowledged my bug, but whatever).
However, now my system is complaining that TCP_NODELAY is not a valid
option. I did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
| I recently downloaded and installed v3.0.8 and installed it on HP-UX
| 11.11. Thankfully, all of the compile problems I reported in 3.0.2 are
| now gone (not sure why no one ever acknowledged my bug, but whatever).
That was my
Well... I see what happened.
I went digging and see that the problem (relating to the duplicate
definition of TCP_NODELAY and TCP_MAXSEG) was fixed as a result of bug
1065. However, though the fix (changes to includes.h, one example being
the section starting at line 312, another starting at
