[Samba] UNIX/SAMBA file permission interaction

2003-01-18 Thread David Beards
Hi Everyone, Just prior to christmas I asked a question relating to the interaction of SAMBA with UNIX permissions. The answer I got back was to set the sticky bit on the folder in question. I did this and sure enough SAMBA then followed the behaviour I expected. Can any one explain to me why?

Re: [Samba] UNIX/SAMBA file permission interaction

2003-01-18 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 10:44:35PM +1100, David Beards wrote: Without the sticky bit set on a folder that has rwx set for ogw a file can be deleted from within this folder (using Windows Explorer) regardless of whether you are the owner or part of the group that this file belongs to. (as long

Re: [Samba] UNIX/SAMBA file permission interaction

2003-01-18 Thread Mike McMullen
If you're curious, the sticky bit used to have another meaning (which is where the name came from). I'm not clear on the details, but it had something to do with keeping an executable's code segment in memory even if there wasn't an instance running. I'm not sure if any current variety of

Re: [Samba] UNIX/SAMBA file permission interaction

2003-01-18 Thread David Beards
Thanks Michael, After receiving this it prompted me to try something different, this time on the UNIX level. For some reason I was under the belief that regardless of the directory permissions the file permissions stood. i.e. if I had a file with permission 644 and I was not the owner then I