Thanks everyone for answers!
21 - 26 ACLs in XFS filesystem is just for POSIX ACL or extended too?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
- Original Message -
From: Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt
To: Harry Jede walk2...@arcor.de
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] acl_xattr
On Freitag, 26. März 2010 wrote Adrian Berlin:
Hi!
Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs)
using acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb?
The docs say that xfs uses 64k.
A small test gives me total other numbers :-( .
xfs can store 21 to 26 ACEs. It depends on
A small test gives me total other numbers :-( .
xfs can store 21 to 26 ACEs. It depends on the size of gidnumber.
ext3 may store 503 to 513 ACEs, also depending on the size of gidnumber.
The test bed:
fresh created /home partitions with:
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/hda6
for xfs, and
mkfs.ext3
Shall I call you god now? :-)
No me. Err, wikipedia:
Why invoke wikipedia when man attr is at hand?
Quote:
This document describes the attr command, which is mostly compatible
with the IRIX command of the same name. It is thus aimed
On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Adrian Berlin wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using
acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
--
You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 250MB of
Hi!
Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using
acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
--
You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 250MB of
Storage!
http://webmail.rock.com/signup/
--
To unsubscribe from
Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using
acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb?
There's something I would really like to know! But somehow it seems to
be a secret of the gods that us mere mortals are not allowed to penetrate...
--
To unsubscribe
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:25:14PM +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using
acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb?
There's something I would really like to know! But somehow it seems to
be a secret of the gods that
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:34 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:25:14PM +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using
acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb?
There's something I would really like
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:38:19AM -0400, simo wrote:
There's something I would really like to know! But somehow it seems to
be a secret of the gods that us mere mortals are not allowed to
penetrate...
Please say if there is any size restriction for xattrs in
XFS. Hopefully there
If I remember correctly XFS used to have a size limit of 64KiB per
xattr.
What about ext3 ext4?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:06 +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
If I remember correctly XFS used to have a size limit of 64KiB per
xattr.
What about ext3 ext4?
Always IIRC, they should be limited by the inode size, which is 4KiB,
but this information is old, and should be verified for
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:39:31PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:38:19AM -0400, simo wrote:
There's something I would really like to know! But somehow it seems to
be a secret of the gods that us mere mortals are not allowed to
penetrate...
Please
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 08:23 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:39:31PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:38:19AM -0400, simo wrote:
There's something I would really like to know! But somehow it seems
to
be a secret of the gods that us
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:53 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:06 +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
If I remember correctly XFS used to have a size limit of 64KiB per
xattr.
What about ext3 ext4?
Always IIRC, they should be limited by the inode size, which is 4KiB,
but
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 12:28 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:53 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:06 +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
If I remember correctly XFS used to have a size limit of 64KiB per
xattr.
What about ext3 ext4?
Always IIRC, they
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:40:49PM -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 12:28 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:53 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:06 +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
If I remember correctly XFS used to have a size limit of 64KiB per
xattr.
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:43 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:40:49PM -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 12:28 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:53 -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:06 +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
If I remember
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:57:27PM +0100, Adrian Berlin wrote:
Hi!
Thanks everyone for answer. So acl_tdb has unlimited storage for extended acls
and acl_xattr has 64KB per xattr?
acl_tdb isn't unlimited, it's ahas a 4GB limit on the size
of the tdb (until we get 64-bit tdb support).
I have
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:10 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:57:27PM +0100, Adrian Berlin wrote:
Hi!
Thanks everyone for answer. So acl_tdb has unlimited storage for extended
acls
and acl_xattr has 64KB per xattr?
acl_tdb isn't unlimited, it's ahas a 4GB limit
Volker Lendecke put forth on 3/26/2010 7:39 AM:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:38:19AM -0400, simo wrote:
There's something I would really like to know! But somehow it seems to
be a secret of the gods that us mere mortals are not allowed to
penetrate...
Please say if there is any size
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:29:42PM +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
I am now experimenting with samba 3.3.0 and acl_xattr. I can see that
there is another method of storing Windows ACLs: acl_tdb.
Can someone here tell me something about the relative merits and
demerits of those two methods?
Hello all
I am now experimenting with samba 3.3.0 and acl_xattr. I can see that
there is another method of storing Windows ACLs: acl_tdb.
Can someone here tell me something about the relative merits and
demerits of those two methods?
I am using CenttOS with an ext3 filesystem.
Thank you!
23 matches
Mail list logo
