Hi,
I disabled oplocks after weeks of corrupt files during
network renders amongst 80+ cpus using XP Pro.
Disabling oplocks fixed my corrupt file issue however
I suspect that my choice of using XP Pro in a serious
production env was a bad one. I am now switching to
2K and have a feeling that
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:27:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I disabled oplocks after weeks of corrupt files during
network renders amongst 80+ cpus using XP Pro.
Disabling oplocks fixed my corrupt file issue however
I suspect that my choice of using XP Pro in a serious
OK, I don't have a strong understanding of oplocks, but I'm sure someone
will correct me where I go wrong.
Overgeneralization #1: Disabling oplocks is ALWAYS a safe thing to do.
Overgeneralization #2: Oplocks provide a performance boost by allowing the
workstation (ws1) to cache a copy of the
Jonathan Johnson said on Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 11:39:09AM -0700:
On 20 Jun 2003, Mark Roach wrote:
I have been searching for info on this and haven't found an
authoritative answer. From what I have read, oplocks are good because
they increase connection speeds, but they are bad because
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
OK, I don't have a strong understanding of oplocks, but I'm sure someone
will correct me where I go wrong.
Those interested in the whole OpLock story might benefit from reading
chapter 14 'File and Record Locking of:
The original url got me nothing, but
this:
http://samba.org/~jht/NT4migration/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf
got me the doc.
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 02:38PM
http://samba.org/~jht/NT4migration/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 15:38, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
OK, I don't have a strong understanding of oplocks, but I'm sure someone
will correct me where I go wrong.
Those interested in the whole OpLock story might benefit from reading
chapter 14
-
From: Mark Roach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:40 PM
To: John H Terpstra
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jonathan Johnson
Subject: Re: [Samba] ok, so oplocks: good or bad?
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 15:38, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
OK, I
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:40:05PM -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
Hi, John. I'm pretty sure I get what oplocks are for and why they are
good, I guess my question would be more along the lines of do they work
properly in samba? along with the error message that prompts the
question.
They work as
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Brandon Lederer wrote:
My comment/question leans towards Windows here I cant turn oplocks off
in Windows (to my knowledge). Therefore they are always ON. If this is the
case, And they dont cause any problems, then WHY do we have to turn them off
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Troy.A Johnson wrote:
The original url got me nothing, but
this:
http://samba.org/~jht/NT4migration/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf
got me the doc.
Apologies for the typo.
- John T.
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 02:38PM
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Mark Roach wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 15:38, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
OK, I don't have a strong understanding of oplocks, but I'm sure someone
will correct me where I go wrong.
Those interested in the whole OpLock
12 matches
Mail list logo
