RE: [Samba] security domain/server

2003-03-04 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 08:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mat, Even though Rational (Now IBM) says this claims that the samba security = domain should work, We got the same issue here. So, I changed it to security = server. If you make this to work with domain, let me know... As far as the

[Samba] security domain/server

2003-03-03 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
I joined the domain with the samba server, however all the users map as nobody. If I change the smb.conf to server it works fine. OS = Solaris 9 Samba = 2.2.3a Windows PDC = Active Directory Windows Clients = 2000 smbstatus -IPC$ nobody nobody 17575 eli-c3s666jst4k

RE: [Samba] security domain/server

2003-03-03 Thread murali
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] security domain/server Yes this is an interop for ClearCase, however I can not even got to the ClearCase stuff right now. The problem is The way I understand: Our

[Samba] security = 'domain' 'server'

2003-02-03 Thread akshaysalkar
(sorry if this post is repeated, i am having problems with my email client) i would like to know whats the difference between security = server security = domain i saw the docs and found that the 'server' does the authentication with and SMB server while 'domain' does an authentication with a NT