Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:26:31PM -0700, Mohammed El-Afifi wrote: 192.168.1.101 is my linux client, 192.168.1.100 is my windows machine(containing the shares I want to access from the fedora 9 box), and 192.168.1.254 is my local DNS server. Obviously there're no messages sent to the linux

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Mohammed, Du (mohammed_elafifi) meintest am 02.07.08: 9 0.057171 192.168.1.101 - 192.168.1.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Host administratively prohibited) Why is ICMP Destination unreachable - sounds like a silly firewall rule. Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Mohammed El-Afifi
. - Original Message From: Helmut Hullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: samba@lists.samba.org Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 9:41:00 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited) Hallo, Mohammed, Du (mohammed_elafifi) meintest am 02.07.08

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:04:44AM -0700, Mohammed El-Afifi wrote: Sorry I didn't mean to reply to your private mail directly.Actually my windows box is running windows xp sp2. Besides, I don't understand why, in any case, I would need nmbd. My linux box is acting as a client, so actually my

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Mohammed, Du meintest am 03.07.08 zum Thema Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited): 9  0.057171 192.168.1.101 - 192.168.1.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Host administratively prohibited) Why is ICMP Destination unreachable

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Mohammed El-Afifi
@lists.samba.org Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 11:55:00 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited) Hallo, Mohammed, Du meintest am 03.07.08 zum Thema Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-03 Thread Mohammed El-Afifi
@lists.samba.org Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 11:55:00 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited) Hallo, Mohammed, Du meintest am 03.07.08 zum Thema Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively

[Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-02 Thread Mohammed El-Afifi
I'm using fedora 9, 64-bit edition, on a machine acting as a client. I've installed samba-client 3.2.0 from a binary package. I amn't running the server portion of samba(smbd, nmbd, or even winbindd). I'm trying to access shares on another windows machine, on the same network 192.168.1.0/24.

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-02 Thread Scott Lovenberg
Mohammed El-Afifi wrote: I'm using fedora 9, 64-bit edition, on a machine acting as a client. I've installed samba-client 3.2.0 from a binary package. I amn't running the server portion of samba(smbd, nmbd, or even winbindd). I'm trying to access shares on another windows machine, on the same

Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited)

2008-07-02 Thread Mohammed El-Afifi
] To: Mohammed El-Afifi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 9:38:41 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient sending ICMP unreachable destination host(administratively prohibited) Mohammed El-Afifi wrote: I'm using fedora 9, 64-bit edition, on a machine acting