Hi,
I can confirm this bug for 3.0.11 as well. We are treating the unix
permissions as a mask for the ACLs at the moment, otherwise we end up
with readonly files etc etc.
I think Peters impression is correct: unix permissions get checked first
and if no 'normal' user has access rights ACL's
Hello again,
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:35:12PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
The log file helped. Try this patch (applies against
raw 3.0.14a). Problem was Solaris was returning 2 in a
place I expected a 1
tried it, makes no
-To: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yannick Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:14:50 -0700
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:07:45PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I will be able to give you the info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yannick Bergeron wrote:
| I can't find any info on the silent delete fail
| bug (how can I reproduce it? what is the impact?)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2227
cheers, jerry
/error.c:error_packet(129)
error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(800) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX)
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Yannick Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11
Hello,
bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:29:31PM -0500, Schaefer Jr, Thomas R.
wrote:
I'm modifying what I wrote this morning. Compiling
--with-acl-support DOES fix the problem on Linux. Jeremy is right.
Although I had compiled it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Kruse wrote:
| Hello,
|
| bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
Looking back at your configs. You need the force
group patch that jeremy posted over the weekend.
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5
Hi Peter,
Bad news at this end too. Peter, Jeremy put out a patch over the
weekend, if you browse back through this thread a little bit you should
find it. He actually posted it twice as I recall. Perhaps the patch
would fix things for you. It fixed things for at least the one person,
Eric
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:41:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
I have yet to get it work properly on Solaris. I'm in the process of
putting together a level 10 debug log and anything else I think
might be useful for him and sending it off to Jeremy. Jeremy had
suggested that the patch he
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:35:12PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
The log file helped. Try this patch (applies against
raw 3.0.14a). Problem was Solaris was returning 2 in a
place I expected a 1
Jeremy.
Index: smbd/posix_acls.c
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:06:01AM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I've tried 3.0.14a this morning with --with-acl-support and it wasn't
working. I've applied your patch to posix_acls.c, rebuild everything from
scratch and the problem persist.
I need more info than your log file shows I'm
fileserver which
provide extended acl that could have the same problem (AFS, GPFS)
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yannick Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
Date: Mon, 18
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:07:45PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I will be able to give you the info tomorrow after 07:30 EDT, just ask for
what you need.
As I said to jerry, we are running on AIX (4.3.3, 5.2 and 5.3 soon). Samba
is used to access DFS fileserver which has its own extended
@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:41:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
I have yet to get it work properly on Solaris. I'm in the process of
putting together a level 10 debug log and anything else I think
might be useful for him and sending
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:42:33PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I've changed defaults in /etc/fstab for the affected partition
to defaults,acl,user_xattr and rebooted the box. I've gone so far as
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:42:33PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I've changed defaults in /etc/fstab for the affected partition
to defaults,acl,user_xattr and rebooted the box. I've gone so far as
søn, 17.04.2005 kl. 05.42 skrev Stewart, Eric:
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I'm not sure what the problem is, but I have Samba 3.0.11 with ACL
support working on 2 RHAS3 servers.
I've changed defaults in /etc/fstab for the
, April 17, 2005 3:54 AM
To: Stewart, Eric
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:42:33PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I've changed defaults
søn, 17.04.2005 kl. 15.37 skrev Stewart, Eric:
Actually I did that - covered it in an earlier message in the thread,
as Samba won't compile in libacl without the libacl-devel package (that's
where the header file it's looking for is). I installed it via up2date.
I missed the thread,
lør, 16.04.2005 kl. 06.04 skrev Stewart, Eric:
Ah ha! Okay it turns out libacl-devel wasn't installed on my
system. And Red Hat says you need to add acl to /etc/fstab.
Well, I can get the compile done but I can't (well, won't) test
from home. If it doesn't work Monday and I
Just making sure everyone knows before I get on the plane :-).
You *must* have configured with --with-acl-support for this to
successfully work with ACLs on 3.0.14a.
If you don't you get the symptoms you're reporting.
Jeremy.
Aaarrrggghhh!!
No no no, I can hardly believe this. I've
Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
Just making sure everyone knows before I get on the plane :-).
You *must* have configured with --with-acl-support for this to
successfully work with ACLs on 3.0.14a.
If you don't you get the symptoms you're reporting.
Jeremy.
So the configure option seems to be
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schaefer Jr, Thomas R.
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 11:00 AM
To: Jeremy Allison
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
Just making sure everyone knows before I get on the plane :-).
You *must* have configured
I'm modifying what I wrote this morning. Compiling --with-acl-support DOES fix
the problem on Linux. Jeremy is right. Although I had compiled it that way
this morning I was accidentally running one of my earlier compiles. Sorry.
Unfortunately for me, the fact that I've got it functioning
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:29:31PM -0500, Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
I'm modifying what I wrote this morning. Compiling --with-acl-support DOES
fix the problem on Linux. Jeremy is right. Although I had compiled it that
way this morning I was accidentally running one of my earlier
users = @LIB+Technology
read only = no
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 9:59 PM
To: Schaefer Jr, Thomas R.
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; Jeremy Allison
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug
Sparc Solaris / UFS file system. I have some ACL's set up for a handful
of users and its all worked flawlessly with every incarnation of Samba
I've used over the past couple years, which would be most.
Last Friday evening I upgraded from 3.0.11 to 3.0.13 and some of the users
I have some ACL's
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
The problem is totally reproducible across different boxes here and even
using the most very basic of a smb.conf. User schaefer should be able to
connect to his home share, go into his tmp/crap/ folder and create,
modify, and
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
The problem is totally reproducible across different boxes here and even
using the most very basic of a smb.conf. User schaefer should be able to
connect to his home share, go into his tmp/crap/ folder and create,
modify, and
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 2:29 PM
To: Tom Schaefer
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
The problem is totally reproducible across different boxes
here
Hello,
(please see below)
Jeremy Allison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# getfacl crap
# file: crap
# owner: root
# group: root
user::---
group::--- #effective:---
group:203:rwx #effective:rwx
group:cfusion:rwx #effective:rwx
mask:rwx
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:49:10PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
User jeremy can create/delete and modify files from a cmd.exe shell
and Windows explorer to his hearts content, no problems.
The difference is that you gave write permissions to user jeremy. In
the other example, permissions
Jeremy Allison wrote:
I'm beginning to think this is a Solaris specific problem.
Can't be, because here is Linux 2.4.29, and have the same problem.
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.
I set it up like this...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# ls -ld crap
d---rwx---+ 2 root root1024 Apr 15 13:53
Hello again,
Peter Kruse wrote:
The difference is that you gave write permissions to user jeremy. In
the other example, permissions are granted _only_ to the group the
user belongs to. So you have to remove the user:jeremy:rwx to
see the bug.
Doesn't seem to make the difference, sorry, in my
Tom Schaefer wrote:
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.
but what permissions do the _files_ have that you can no longer modify?
User schaefer still can't rename or delete files in the
Kruse
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 3:30 PM
To: Tom Schaefer
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
Tom Schaefer wrote:
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment
(Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used
Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
(please see below)
Jeremy Allison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# getfacl crap
# file: crap
# owner: root
# group: root
user::---
group::--- #effective:---
group:203:rwx #effective:rwx
group:cfusion:rwx
Stewart, Eric wrote:
...
# l junk
total 5560
drwxrwxr-x2 bb mysql4096 Apr 15 15:32 ./
drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Apr 15 15:21 ../
-rwxrw-r--1 LIB+eric mysql 5668947 Mar 25 09:11
HPLJ4250-070323-ILLiad.pdf*
does solaris ls not indicate ACLs with a +? What
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:29:58PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Tom Schaefer wrote:
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.
but what permissions do the _files_ have that you can no
I still have the bug after upgrading to 3.0.14a
logfile
[2005/04/15 16:18:28, 10] smbd/statcache.c:stat_cache_lookup(243)
stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [CBBSP/CBBSP6/NEW TEXT
DOCUMENT.TXT] - [CBBSP/CBBSP6/New Text Document.txt]
[2005/04/15 16:18:28, 10]
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ah, I didn't know you were not using 3.0.14a. I'm testing against that
release and also the current SAMBA_3_0 SVN and can't reproduce. That does
make sense as I made changes in smbd/posix_acls.c for this very problem
from 3.0.13 (and messed them up in the 3.0.14 original
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:18:59PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I still have the bug after upgrading to 3.0.14a
logfile
[2005/04/15 16:18:28, 10] smbd/statcache.c:stat_cache_lookup(243)
stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [CBBSP/CBBSP6/NEW TEXT
DOCUMENT.TXT] -
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:31:40PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I'm starting to think this is the cause of the problems for people.
I can check this by compiling without acl support and seeing if I
can reproduce the bug.
Yep - confirmed it. For the people who are reporting this bug, you're
Hello again list
Here is my output from configure 3.0.13:
g-file root # grep -i acl samba.log
* myconf is: --with-acl-support --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
--disable-cups --with-ldap --without-ldapsam --with-quotas
--with-sys-quotas --with-winbind --with-python=yes --with-readline
--with-ads
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:31:35PM +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
Hello again list
Here is my output from configure 3.0.13:
g-file root # grep -i acl samba.log
* myconf is: --with-acl-support --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
--disable-cups --with-ldap --without-ldapsam --with-quotas
Ah okay, I might have misunderstand something here, but thats okay. It's
late in Denmark now.
I will give it a shot when I have the time.
Thanx again Jeremy.
- Jacob
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:31:35PM +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
Hello again list
Here is my output
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:49:47PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
Ignoring the minor issue of the created files perms not matching
the force create mode (I know it's now an OR thing that I can fix), I
should still be able to delete this file, as I've been forced to the
mysql group
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.
I set it up like this...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash#
PM
To: Stewart, Eric
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:49:47PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
Ignoring the minor issue of the created files perms not matching
the
force create mode (I know it's now an OR thing that I can fix
message from me.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 6:28 PM
To: Stewart, Eric
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:49:47PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote
51 matches
Mail list logo
