From: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
To: charles
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:27:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [Samba] ubuntu, ocfs2 with cman and ctdb
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and
running
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:17 PM, charles wrote:
From: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
To: charles
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:27:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [Samba] ubuntu, ocfs2 with cman and ctdb
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011 02:27
An: charles
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] ubuntu, ocfs2 with cman and ctdb
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and
running
for a highly
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running
for a highly available file server.
we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running
for a highly available file server.
we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on seperate 2 node setups.
ocfs2 seems to provide better throughput and iops to samba clients than does
gluster and that is comparing
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running
for a highly available file server.
we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on seperate 2 node setups.
ocfs2 seems to provide better throughput and
