-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See https://www.cifs2002.org/conference/program/presentations
Might help you a bit. Check out the presentations on performance
measurement.
Great link!
However this one is a 404
Jeremy
See https://www.cifs2002.org/conference/program/presentations
Might help you a bit. Check out the presentations on performance
measurement.
Great link!
However this one is a 404
Jeremy Allison, Samba Team Samba Printing(pdf, 141k)
This presentation is an explaination of how RPC printing
Hi,
I think that in Windows there is code that
detect that the server is not an original
Windows NT or 2000 server box. After this
detection Windows give's extra waits in the
I/O to frustrate the user and encourage him
to buy original Windows Server software.
I don't trust these guys in Redmond.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Kees Damen wrote:
Hi,
I think that in Windows there is code that
detect that the server is not an original
Windows NT or 2000 server box. After this
detection Windows give's extra waits in the
I/O to frustrate the user and encourage him
to buy original Windows Server
] Does 3MB/sec seem as fast as Samba is?
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Kees Damen wrote:
Hi,
I think that in Windows there is code that
detect that the server is not an original
Windows NT or 2000 server box. After this
detection Windows give's extra waits in the
I/O to frustrate the user
-Original Message-
From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kees Damen; Robert Adkins
Cc: Samba List
Subject: Re: [Samba] Does 3MB/sec seem as fast as Samba is?
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Kees Damen wrote:
Hi,
I
Just out of curiousityI ran a quick test on my humble system
(server: slackware 8.1, samba 2.2.6, 128MB ram, pIII 700, hd IDE 7200RPM
udma 66, xfs; client: PIII 525 , Win2k, 196MBram, HDide
5400RPM udma 66.NTFS, network UTP 100mb/s half-duplex)
and the
