Re: [Samba] Signal 11 in smbd 3.0.2rc2 on printer operation!

2004-02-10 Thread Jerry Haltom
Follow up on this. I have SAMBA_3_0 from CVS, checked out about 4 days ago (last time we discussed this). I have been able to cause hte problem, or another similar problem, im not sure, to be reproduced. What I was doing was adding a new printer, by editing smb.conf, adding the new printer entry,

Re: [Samba] Signal 11 in smbd 3.0.2rc2 on printer operation!

2004-02-05 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jerry Haltom wrote: | | Could a corrupt .tdb of any sort be causing this? It | is touching a variable named pdb (maybe printer db?), | but I'm not sure what that is. It could I guess, but I agree with Jeremy. That's a strange place to crash. How many

Re: [Samba] Signal 11 in smbd 3.0.2rc2 on printer operation!

2004-02-05 Thread Jerry Haltom
Nope. In fact, I do suspect bad ram. I don't know why it would be consistant though. I would think that bad ram would effect more than just samba's printing. And you'd think reacreating the process (different location in memory) would get around it. The problem is pretty consistant, it's happening

Re: [Samba] Signal 11 in smbd 3.0.2rc2 on printer operation!

2004-02-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:29:16AM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: Nope. In fact, I do suspect bad ram. I don't know why it would be consistant though. I would think that bad ram would effect more than just samba's printing. And you'd think reacreating the process (different location in memory)

Re: [Samba] Signal 11 in smbd 3.0.2rc2 on printer operation!

2004-02-04 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:35:11PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: Our computers in our office ceased being able to print to a shared cups printer today. Could not find the cause. Seems the smbd processes are dying. Below is the stack trace produced by gdb bt full. The Samba 'panic action'

Re: [Samba] Signal 11 in smbd 3.0.2rc2 on printer operation!

2004-02-04 Thread Jerry Haltom
I don't know enough about what is going on to know if what I'm saying makes any sense. :) But I'm working on it. Could a corrupt .tdb of any sort be causing this? It is touching a variable named pdb (maybe printer db?), but I'm not sure what that is. Since I had the problem I have deleted all of