Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Gary Dale (garyd...@rogers.com):
Now perhaps I'm missing something, but I have no trouble with users
mounting nfs shares. The idea that users can't
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:45:20 -0400
Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
Yes, we added a patch a while back to make it such that mount.cifs
would not allow itself to run as a setuid root program unless it that
check was
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
Yes, we added a patch a while back to make it such that mount.cifs
would not allow itself to run as a setuid root program unless it that
check was
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:37:30 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
Jeff Layton wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:47 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have
recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
Yes, we added a patch a while back to make it such that mount.cifs
would not allow itself to run as a setuid root
Quoting Gary Dale (garyd...@rogers.com):
Now perhaps I'm missing something, but I have no trouble with users
mounting nfs shares. The idea that users can't mount cifs shares
strikes me as odd and an unnecessary impediment.
How about turning the binary we provide in Debian to setuid on the
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Gary Dale (garyd...@rogers.com):
Now perhaps I'm missing something, but I have no trouble with users
mounting nfs shares. The idea that users can't mount cifs shares
strikes me as odd and an unnecessary impediment.
How about turning the binary we
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Gary Dale (garyd...@rogers.com):
Now perhaps I'm missing something, but I have no trouble with users
mounting nfs shares. The idea that users can't mount cifs shares
strikes me as odd and
Am 07.04.10 22:44, schrieb Gary Dale:
How do I mount an smb/cifs share as a normal user without running
mount.cifs? Or if I have to mount the share as root, how can I get
reasonable access to the shares?
Use FUSE.
Regards Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:47 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have
recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set.
That would be because it was horribly unsecure.
Now it
appears that they have
Jeff Layton wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:47 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have
recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set.
That would be because it was horribly unsecure.
Now
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
Yes, we added a patch a while back to make it such that mount.cifs
would not allow itself to run as a setuid root program unless it that
check was compiled out.
This was done due to a rather constant stream of security
Quoting Jeff Layton (jlay...@samba.org):
It's also worthwhile to note that I've recently re-enabled the ability
to run mount.cifs as a setuid root program in the latest cifs-utils
release:
http://linux-cifs.samba.org/cifs-utils/
...you may want to switch to using that instead if you need
13 matches
Mail list logo
