Hi,
We have been having a few problems with a M$ Access DB held on a Samba server
Samba version: samba-2.2.4-2N1
We have rebuilt a new server, and transferred the database over to the new
box, along with word/excel docs etc. Everything is working fine, except the
access database, which is
On Sunday 27 October 2002 16:37, Jay Ts wrote:
Samba as a PDC. Samba has no limitation (AFAIK) to the number of
clients. There are no licensing fees - this isn't Microsoft, you know? ;)
I know, but I thought Microsoft would mess the thing up with the 5 CALs on the
AD server. :)
You might
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 10:27 schrieb Elliot:
guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error
checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
Aborting config
Your downloaded source archive may be incomplete...
You should post the relevant parts
Hello!
I try to mount an smb share with:
smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
and I get following error message:
Failed to find real path for mount point
What does it mean? The mount point is accessible and the owner of the mount
point is USER.
Whith an earlier
Hi,
I have a linux box on RH7.3 with samba 2.2.5-1 and cups-1.1.14-15.
I create a cups printer on to this machine with success, It called lptest?
and apparently, when I send a page test it works fine.
But now I want to share It via Samba then I putted the different setting in
smb.conf . I
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 10:48 schrieb Elliot:
I cannot seem to find config.log .. Ran updatedb but nothing.
I downloaded the tar.gz file twice ...but both times I get this error
Post the config.log file in your build directory (where you ran configure).
What are your configure
atom wrote:
Well i agree that hiding the special $ is a good idea.
I don't understand how can I parse the smbclient Output wihout the
Disk
word
smbclient -L atomix | sed s/' Disk '//
Also I noticed you don't care about possible spaces in the share names
and theys are being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:51:50 -0300
From: cyroreal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba-nt-domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Winbind with samba PDC
Is it possible to use winbind to authenticate my
Yes, I tried it with the same result.
Michael
I try to mount an smb share with:
smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
and I get following error message:
Failed to find real path for mount point
What does it mean? The mount point is accessible and the owner of
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 06:24, Michael Wisse wrote:
Yes, I tried it with the same result.
Michael
I try to mount an smb share with:
smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
and I get following error message:
Failed to find real path for mount point
What does
Harald Kümmerle wrote:
Jay Ts wrote:
Samba as a PDC. Samba has no limitation (AFAIK) to the number of
clients. There are no licensing fees - this isn't Microsoft, you know? ;)
I know, but I thought Microsoft would mess the thing up with the 5 CALs
on the AD server. :)
Oops, I thought
Matt Gilliam wrote:
I have a small problem...
All of my windows machines, XP Pro and 98 cannot see my samba server
running on RH 7.3
i can do a smbclient -Llocalhost and see all my computers on the network,
also windows is telling me
that it is unable to browse the network, but if i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frank_K=FCster_geb=2E_F=FCrst?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] oplocks and share modes
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:49:50 +
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:51:13PM +0200, Frank Küster geb. Fürst wrote:
Yes, thanks. Just one more question: For
Any ideas where i can get a things to check list for performace tuning of Samba
Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still going ...now 12:20!
100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz, 512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb drives
samba
--
mandrake
if
!helpful == samba list
then
get the fuck off the list
good luck with your lil windows boxes and Linux servers.
I need to allow a REMOTE server user access to his /home/user files.
I realize allowing REMOTE clients is incredibly insecure, but I am
firewalling samba so that only his STATIC
Try an
ifconfig and see if you are getting errors on the NIC first.
Noel
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 28 October 2002
12:38To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] Samba
PerformanceAny ideas
where i can get a "things to check"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas where i can get a things to check list for performace
tuning of Samba
Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still
going ...now 12:20!
100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz,
512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb
Hi All:
Excuse me for butting in here, but I'm planning a migration from WinNT 4
to Samba in the near future and this thread has caused me to worry a
little.
Take the case that I'm planning: 3 Domains each to its own LAN
(connected via 128k Frame Relay lines to form a WAN) Each domain
currently
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
We've got six systems running it with no visible issues.
I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the
direction I should be heading?
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Noel Kelly wrote:
I think you definitely have a problem with your NIC on the Samba machine. I
would swap it out and/or change the cable and see if that cures things. By
the sound of that explanation above it could also be something like a PCI
Robert,
Suggest you update to the latest stable release 2.2.6, you may find this
problem will go away.
- John T.
On 28 Oct 2002, Robert Stanford wrote:
I have an issue where at odd times, maybe after 3 days, maybe after a
week, people suddenly cant do domain logons. Unfortunately the machine
Title: ENC: utilizing smbpasswd with two user ###URGENT###
Hi,
I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo).
I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid user unix (user_unix=cs02929)
(this problem is because the admintool only create user
I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10.
I'm having a lot of oplock problems, specially when using office
applications like word.
I would like to know:
1. what is the recommended configuration in version 2.2.1a (oplocks = yes/no
, level2 oplocks = yes/no , kernel oplocks
Do you have the 'addprinter command' parameter set in smb.conf? If so,
remove it
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 05:18, Kalkoul Morad wrote:
Hi,
I have a linux box on RH7.3 with samba 2.2.5-1 and cups-1.1.14-15.
I create a cups printer on to this machine with success, It called lptest?
and
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44 pm, Mike Rambo wrote:
[SNIP]
scripts run fine on the workstations at login. I'm using a netlogon
script I found at http://www.0x0a.com/netlogon.php that I've modified to
handle multiple groups based upon group membership in /etc/group as I
need. If I run the script
Are you talking about access rights (like write list = @group) ?
I found a few interesting things with groups and security=domain with
winbind:
1. the @group syntax applies to the UNIX group names. To give access to an
NT group, you need to use something like this:
write list =
General consensus is to disable oplocks for a hassle free existence
especially with Office apps:
Oplocks = no
Kernel Oplocks = no
Level2 Oplocks = no
HTH
Noel
Also, something Jeremy posted to the list a few days ago:
Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes
and locking.
I have a perl script that I'd like to use to create windows 9x login
scripts at login time but I cannot get the process to work right. I have
RedHat 7.3 (actually the k12ltsp v2.1.0 which is a modified RH7.3) set
up as a domain controller which is working well. Manually created login
scripts run
Title: Run smbclient in Unix shell script
Hi,
I can run smbclient on Sun Solaris Korn shell command line to access a NT server from an Unix
worksation without problem but always got session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
when run it from a Korn shell script.
Any help or suggestion
When do you get this problem and what are your client settings. Are you
moving an existing account to another machine or the same machine with a
new os?
Nick
Michele Santucci wrote:
This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is
different this time, it sounds like
Hello,
I used cvs to download and build samba, but it failed to build with error
message:
checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure. Aborting
config
I used the following download and build process:
(solaris 7 11/99 gcc 3.2 automake 1.7, libtool 1.4.3, gnu make 3.80,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. We hope that this will be our
last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0
readt for
When do you get this problem and what are your client settings. Are you
moving an existing account to another machine or the same machine with a
new os?
Nick
Michele Santucci wrote:
This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is
different this time, it sounds like
I updated from the newest cvs (HEAD) today, and now am unable to make
changes to the group mapping database using smbgroupedit. It has worked
successfully in the past. Using OpenLdap as passdb backend.
The command
smbgroupedit -v
works as advertised and lists all the built
Hi,
I have a network that runs samba 2.2.5 on a Linux box that acts as the
primary server on the network. It is the PDC, WINS, etc.. The Windows
2000 server is nothing more then a box that runs Terminal Services for
Remote Access. Anyway, I know that in Samba any member of the domain
admin
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Nir Livni wrote:
I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10.
Suggest you update to samba-2.2.6. There have been several patches to
locking code in samba since 2.2.1a. The other reply you received is also
good information.
- John T.
I'm having a lot
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
So there will never be a stable samba again? ;)
We hope that this will be our
last
Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response.
I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for
upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that
I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was successful. I
set the log level to 3 (I saw that in man
Yes and No
When i get a getent groups or groups, I only get domain admins. I am a
member of about 10 groups and they aren't being listed.
Does this matter:
winbind uid = 4-4
winbind gid = 5-5
for some reason i am not getting a list of the correct groups but when i
type wbinfo
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
So there will never be a
Sorry, I don't know any more, hopefully one of the samba gurus might have
an explanation for the behavior.
Karen Wieprecht
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have following configuration :
[global]
workgroup = testing
server string = Samba-Server
security = SHARE
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
character set = ISO8859-15
kernel oplocks = No
[printers]
comment =
I am having an issue with NT4 workstations changing their passwords on a
regular basis. I am getting the following error:
Description: Changing machine account password for account WS10$ failed
with the following error:
The handle is invalid.
This does not happen on all the NT4 workstations
I have Samba 2.2.6 complied against Cups 1.1.16 on a Sparc system running
Solaris 9. Cups has replaced the stock system V lp spooler on this system
(original packages removed.)
Cups working from UNIX command line is A-OK.
I have been working on setting up Samba to play nice with cups. I
Dear list,
We are experiencing users unexpectedly accessing each others files.
It happens when they try to access files that are called the same and which
is located in an equal file structure under their login drive. Two other
conditions
need to be fulfilled: one of the users needs to have the
Hello,
Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running
Samba would be unsafe solaris
I went into tests folder and tried summary.c. It fails with the above error.
I tried to make the fcntl_lock manually like it tries and got the following:
I'm running 2.2.6
When daylight savings time changed this weekend I
had to reset all samba sessions as the sessions didn't pick up the time
change.
Copying file from a Windows client to the server
made the filetime off by one hour.
Killing all the same sessions (also restarted smbd
-- not
Collins, Kevin wrote:
Hi All:
Excuse me for butting in here, but I'm planning a migration from WinNT 4
to Samba in the near future and this thread has caused me to worry a
little.
Take the case that I'm planning: 3 Domains each to its own LAN
(connected via 128k Frame Relay lines to
Thanks for your help though! :)
-Original Message-
From: Wieprecht, Karen M. [mailto:Karen.Wieprecht;jhuapl.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:19 PM
To: 'Jennifer Fountain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues
Sorry, I don't know any more, hopefully
Hello all.
Our system consists of two linux machines, each running Red Hat 7.1
(kernel 2.4.9-34), using SMB to mount multiple shares hosted by a
Windows 2000 Advance Server. smbclient from Samba 2.2.5 is used to do
the actual mounting.
Over the weekend, a number of files on these SMBFS shares
On the client machine; Control Panel Administration Tools Local
Security Policy Local Policy Security Options Send unencrypted
password to third-party SMB servers = enabled
Michele Santucci wrote:
Are the user and machine$ added to your /etc/passwd and smbpasswd files?
all the user
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, SALOME Alexandre wrote:
Hi,
I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo).
I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid
user unix (user_unix=cs02929)
(this problem is because the admintool only create user with 8
Well i checked the www.cpan.org for any samba perl modules and found one:
http://search.cpan.org/author/ALIAN/Filesys-SmbClientParser-2.3/SmbClientPar
ser.pm
than looked at the source and found this line:
if ( $line =~ /^\s+([\S ]*\S)\s+(Disk)\s+([\S ]*)/ )
This module also uses the Disk
Markus Schabel wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
So there will never be a stable samba again? ;)
:-)
We
Hello,
My name is Delisa, I have used the website testing technologies here at the Safe
Shopping Network (http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com) to test your site
(samba.anu.edu.au) for security, usability and performance. You will be pleased to
know that it did quite well. The reason I did the
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Kris Kelley wrote:
When I discovered this was happening, I unmounted all SMBFS shares, and
remounted them. This fixed the problem; all files created now have the
correct timestamp.
smbfs sets the mtimes itself. Not really sure why it was done like that,
but some comments
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:47:33PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Been running with this change since friday and it looks good. I can not
find any leaking FDs anymore. The usage of the server has been very low
so I won't know for sure until Monday afternoon.
Does this mean it's a
--- Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he's referring to the phenomenon that
I've seen on way too
many technical mailing lists: be a complete
asshole and you'll get
the complete and undivided attention of multiple
developers and power
users, all of of whom assert,
On friday we changed our
smb.conf file to test the security model that uses DOMAIN authenticacion. It
worked fine testing two seperate usernames from Multiple Workstations connecting
to a WORLD access share on the SAMBA server.
I have to say nothing has
changed at all since friday, apart
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:55:05PM -0500, David Shapiro wrote:
Hello,
Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running
Samba would be unsafe solaris
Dunno why you would get this, solaris works fine of course.
Maybe something screwy with your gcc installation?
-Original Message-From: Rend, Jon (Jon) %
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: Access Problem connecting from
windows 2000 client to Samba UNIX server Share
On friday we changed our
smb.conf file to test the security model that uses DOMAIN
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Matt Nelson wrote:
Since I posted this over the weekend, I thought I'd throw it out one more
time to see if anyone else might see it and has any ideas on this.
I didn't know samba could serve macs. Does the mac speak SMB?
(Long time since I used macs)
Hello,
I amrunning Red
Hat 7.3 Samba 2.26 and winbind. I have been able to join the domain and
test all of the followingwith these commands. All works great.
winbind -u
winbind -g
getent passwd
getent group
But when I set up a share to test with one domain
user account it just presents
We have installed Samba 2.2.5 under SuSE Linux (kernel 2.4.7) on a z/800
(IBM mainframe) and are witnessing usually high processor usage. The high
usage is associated with one of the clients. The client runs a script on
an OS/2 machine that continuously works its way through a long list of
small
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:48 am, you wrote:
Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response.
I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for
upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that
I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was
We have installed Samba 2.2.5 under SuSE Linux (kernel 2.4.7) on a z/800
(IBM mainframe) and are witnessing usually high processor usage. The high
usage is associated with one of the clients. The client runs a script on
an OS/2 machine that continuously works its way through a long list of
Hello, all
I have a problem with my administrator accounts on WinNT with Samba.
When I log in locally as the Administrator, it works as expected - I *am*
the administrator for the machine.
When I log into the domain as Administrator, it works as expected - I log in
as root.
The prolem comes
Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours:
Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors
when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or fortunately as
we can fix this :-) it's a Samba bug, not a Linux kernel bug.
Great!
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Markus Schabel wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
^^
latest != last
You might want to upgrade to a newer version of samba. This works for
me with samba 2.2.4 and 2.2.6
D. Joe Anderson wrote:
Hi,
The documentation I've read indicates that I should be able to get Samba to
honor the value of the 'workgroup' variable as set from within an included
virtual server
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:33:22PM -0600, Jennifer Crusade wrote:
Hello,
I am running Red Hat 7.3 Samba 2.26 and winbind. I have been able to join
the domain and test all of the following with these commands. All works
great.
But when I set up a share to test with one domain user
Sean Angley wrote:
Does anyone has a good reference to tuning Samba performance?
It used to be that you could tune some Samba configuration file
(smb.conf) parameters to get better performance, but AFAIK, all
those are now the defaults. The important thing is to not mess
with them.
If there
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:10:26AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours:
Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors
when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or fortunately
Mike,
In case you still need a configurable login script ...
Add to [netlogon] share:
root preexec = perl /usr/local/samba/lib/genlogon.pl %u %g %m
root postexec = perl /usr/local/samba/lib/genlogoff.pl %u
Good luck,
Uli
---
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
#
Here is my scenario; I have a FreeBSD 4.7 Release running
Samba 2.2.6. I am using samba as a PDC. I have installed everything need
including the Win XP Sign or seal registry patch. I added a one XP machine account for one
machine, and it works fine. Logging
in and mounting network drives
Can anyone tell me what version of GCC and GAS are needed to
compile samba v2.2.5 on a linux machine?
Thanks
Hello,
When I put 'wbinfo -u'
always give me an error, can any one help me ??
== Error looking up domain users
Thank you so much !
Agus
=
Ikuti polling TELKOM Memo 166 di www.plasa.com dan menangkan hadiah masing-masing
I am having problems uploading printer drivers from my WinXP workstation. I
can use my Win2K workstation just fine, but when I try to use the exact same
user ID and access the exact same printer, the New Driver... button on the
XP printer dialog is disabled. The only thing I can think of is
guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error
$ checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
Aborting config
I am not sure how to resolve it. I have posted my error log file at
http://www.mutualinterest.com.sg/config.log hope someone can help me
Hello,
I have error on compiling time
I tried on HP-UX 11.00 system with gcc version 3.1 to compile samba source
Samba latest version source was dowloaded from www.us1.samba.org/samba/ftp
I attached log file with this error
thank you.
begin 600 samba_make.log.doc
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 03:56 schrieb Martin Dube:
Can anyone tell me what version of GCC and GAS are needed to compile samba
v2.2.5 on a linux machine?
You should use the C-Compiler which is installed on your distribution if it is
not older then 2.95.2 or 3.2.
greetings
Florian Rauh
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:46:53PM -0800, Michael J. Luevane wrote:
Hello, all
I have a problem with my administrator accounts on WinNT with Samba.
When I log in locally as the Administrator, it works as expected - I *am*
the administrator for the machine.
When I log into the domain as
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 06:58 schrieb Lora:
Hello,
I have error on compiling time
I tried on HP-UX 11.00 system with gcc version 3.1 to compile samba source
Samba latest version source was dowloaded from www.us1.samba.org/samba/ftp
I attached log file with this error
thank you.
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Markus Schabel wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
So there will
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:17:20PM +1100, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
so I could see some locks from the unix level.
It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files
(but not the locks I was expecting), but for little
files it shows nothing:
# ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc
#
[sorry - bit of a belated reply - I have a bit of a backlog to read]
On 23rd.Oct.2002, Linda Walsh asked :
I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
came w/samba 2.2.5.
A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ _nmb_ to 2
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:43:53AM -0700, Chris de
Vidal wrote:
OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only
turned
them off, made no other changes, and have no more
corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't
that be
a priority 1, drop everything
Hi,
I added these lines to smb.conf:
kernel op locks = false
op locks = false
strict locking = true
so I could see some locks from the unix level.
It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files
(but not the locks I was expecting), but for little
files it shows nothing:
Yeh it's not local group as in local machine domain groups, it's local as in
AD groups..
There are 3 types. Local, Global and Universal..
The most basic type of group suitable for networking is the global group,
used to control access to resources that exist anywhere on the network. The
primary
Don Hayward wrote:
No, it doesn't -- it returns null. I also tried a line of
perl that uses getpwnam and it failed in the same way.
So how does /etc/nsswitch.conf look like (in the chroot)?
--
Roland Bauerschmidt
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
So how does /etc/nsswitch.conf look like (in the chroot)?
--
The etc/nsswitch.conf in the chroot is:
passwd: compat
group: compat
shadow: compat
hosts: files dns
networks: files
protocols: db files
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
So how does /etc/nsswitch.conf look like (in the chroot)?
I was missing the libnss_*s to make it work. Thanks again.
Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mote Marine Laboratory Office: 941.388.4441 Cell: 941.302.4982
I had the same problem aswell..
I found it was due to the fact the groups weren't 'Global' groups only
'Local' groups...
Apparently they need to be Global or Universal to be shown by Winbind.
I have tried using Global and Universal groups on the AD server and
neither type seems to work.
--- Neil Hoggarth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I'd be happy to let the group know. I'm not
positive
we'll reenable anything but kernel oplocks,
though.
We have work to do.
The kernel oplocks parameter affects how Unix
processes accessing the
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:36:00PM -0800, Chris de Vidal wrote:
The team probably would have to install Elixir's Opus
and process large flat db files (Fox Pro, I think)
with multiple processes on multiple servers... in
other words, it probably isn't going to happen. The
corruption will
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The oplock code in Samba has been *heavily* tested.
The one thing we cannot fix is clients ignoring
oplock
break requests. If you can show a problem occurring
when clients are *not* ignoring oplock break
requests then
it's a Samba logic bug and we'll jump on it
A curious article:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55795,00.html
It says that the Messenger Service Spammers are using port 135, which
means that they're not using regular WinPOPUP stuff (the 03 names on
port 139). I do, in fact, see connect attempts to port 135 in my home
Yes I have, this morning as a matter a fact. I don't know what caused it
(maybe daylight savings). I fixed it by stopping then starting Samba
(not restarting) the first time it happend. The second time it happened
starting and stopping (not restarting) didn't work so I unplugged
(cutting off
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Nick Schuetz wrote:
Yes I have, this morning as a matter a fact. I don't know what caused it
(maybe daylight savings). I fixed it by stopping then starting Samba
(not restarting) the first time it happend. The second time it happened
starting and stopping (not
I had no choice but to cold reset the computer once it started to hang.
I would type in my user name and password, the loading your profile
window would pop up and just hang forever (at least it seemed like
forever). If the SID was confilicting I would not have even got to the
point of loading
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
