On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Oktay Akbal wrote:
shared-storage or nfs (however this is made redundant in his case).
Both servers would then have the same tdbs.
Hm, this would mean he'd need to introduce a third server which holds
the shared storage. And to have this
I have a problem with a hp930c install on a linux redhat7.3
In linux the printing is fine there are no problem.
The problem are when printing from win98 or other windows machines via samba !
Is printing PCL code. that's a lot of garbage.
What are the settings for the driver in order to stop
What should this tell me? As far as I understood your link, it's about
making Win XP Home Edition join a Domain. I don't have XP Home, just XP
mission impossible!
windows XP home does not support domains!!
Pro and some Windows 2000 Pro boxes.
Alexander Skwar
--
To unsubscribe from this
wow / i did newer see such a response to a theme as in this case! :-O
here's a suggestion:
i did send (in a view cases) a short message to this 'NEWBEES' with
important internet links, such as: (e.g.)
http://www.samba.org/samba/ml-etiquette.html
http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba/
Could this be related to ip forwarding being disabled? Do you have a
firewall?
---Original Message---
From: Rodrigo Gruppelli
Date: 14 februarie 2003 08:12:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Can't access remote workstations without MASQUERADE
Hi everyone! I have a
The way I see the use of this mailing list is that everybody that uses the
knowledge gathered here also has the responsibility to contribute at his own
level.
By this I mean that I, having some Samba experience, try to answer those
questions that correspond to my level of skills.
I will
I have tried recently to link up two computers over the network using my machine which
is win2000 and our Redhat Linux server 7.2 using samba v 2.2.
When I browse the network I can see the approprate workgroup which I have named
'Linux' but the workgroup appears to have nothing available inside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
I still have a problem adding a driver to samba 2.2.7a-0.1 with
cupsaddsmb.
You tell the version of Samba -- yet you don't tell the version of
the other important component: CUPS. Which is it?
Currently I'm running cups 1.1.14
Hi,
I am running a Samba 2.2.7a on Redhat 7.3 in a NT domain. For authentication
I am using the domainusers.This is done by Winbind 2.2.7a which verifies the
existens of the users on the PDC. So I dont't have to create local users
(/etc/passwd) for users who want to connect to the shares in the
Dear Group,
I'm using samba as PDC and all works fine but i want to do a thing that it
is not explained in any samba manual i could found in Internet.
Under WinNT when you create a new user there is the checkbox that allows
the new user to change the password at the first login presenting an
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 01:27, David Morel wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to automate a server connection to various shares on my network (so
as to back them up). I use smbmount which works fine, except on one machine
running winXp:
i shared a directory on that machine, using a locally created
Duncan Turner schrieb:
I have tried recently to link up two computers over the network using my machine which is win2000 and our Redhat Linux server 7.2 using samba v 2.2.
When I browse the network I can see the approprate workgroup which I have named 'Linux' but the workgroup appears to have
Hi all,
I have a bug with Version 2.2.3a-12 for Debian GNU/Linux (custom 2.4.20
kernel with aacraid support (DELL PowerEdge 1650 with RAID mirror, etc)):
Some users have, SOMETIMES, a READ ONLY set on files, where no one
except them use this files.
I'm in oplocks=false because of MS-Excel 97
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And, here what I have!!! : First file has NO PROBLEM, second one HAS
READ ONLY ERROR, (but not if the file is REOPEN again):
-rw-rw-r--1 nobody nogroup 37888 Feb 14 11:46 test_file_1.doc
-rwxr--r--1 nobody nogroup 37376 Feb 14
I presume that's output from ls -l. I would hazard a guess that your
server and client clocks are not in sync. If you're on linux, try ls
--full-time
Yes! It's ls -l output I've posted.
And yes again, client and server are not in sync.
Do you mean that way I've to install ntpd and sync
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I presume that's output from ls -l. I would hazard a guess that your
server and client clocks are not in sync. If you're on linux, try ls
--full-time
Yes! It's ls -l output I've posted.
And yes again, client and server are not in sync.
Do you
Do you mean that way I've to install ntpd and sync date/hour mechanism
between samba server and clients?
It's always a good idea to have the workstations in sync.
Type this in a .bat file, that loads at start:
NET TIME \\SERVER /SET /YES
--
frankie
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
after build some new packages for Debian Woody of the 1.1.18 release of
samba and fiddling with user permissions I successfully added the
printer drivers to my samba box. But I was not satisfied with the
results which the adboe postscript
O email [EMAIL PROTECTED] foi alterado para [EMAIL PROTECTED], entretanto a
sua mensagem foi redirecionada para o novo email.
Atenciosamente,
American BankNote Ltda
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:45:38AM +0800, Catherine Shen wrote:
You mean the authentication or the changing password part??
I mean I didn't try that specific test you were talking about, the one
mapping a network drive from the command prompt.
Are they not supported at all??
I assumed that
Hi,
I'm runnig a red hat 8 with a samba 2.2.5 and my client computer is configured in our
network with dhcp. But the problem is I can see my computer from a NT4 system with sp6
and from a win 2k I can not see him. I put in the smb.conf file encrypted passwords =
yes.
What else should I do?
Kurt Weiss schrieb:
mission impossible!
windows XP home does not support domains!!
Well, as pointed out in the link, that's not true. But as I said, how
did this link help with my problem?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (en)
Homepage:
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:37:53 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Rutzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] domain users in local groups with Winbind/Samba/Redhat
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thanks a lot,
The problem was in smb.conf location. In Debian package
it is /etc/smb.conf, not /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf as was
more familiar for me. I also rebuilt 2.2.7a from source as I
need NIS+ support.
Cyril.
Chris de Vidal wrote:
--- Cyril Y. Nickonorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm runnig a red hat 8 with a samba 2.2.5 and my client computer is =
configured in our network with dhcp. But the problem is I can see my =
computer from a NT4 system with sp6 and from a win 2k I can not see him. =
I put in the smb.conf file encrypted passwords =3D yes.
What else
I as wondering how I can stop a user from accessing the net if they just
Cancel out of the logon. I know I can use the poledit, but I prefer to do it
from samba. Id Imagine it has something to do with mapping to a guest user
who has no access. Can someone clarify this for me?
Ty Kev
--
To
--- Kurt Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow / i did newer see such a response to a theme as
in this case! :-O
Yeah, it actually had the opposite effect of what I
was begging people to do :-P
here's a suggestion:
i did send (in a view cases) a short message to this
'NEWBEES' with
important
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:00:08 +0100, Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kurt Weiss schrieb:
mission impossible!
windows XP home does not support domains!!
Well, as pointed out in the link, that's not true. But as I said, how
did this link help with my problem?
This is from Microsoft's
I'm sorry I gave the appearance I was slamming you.
The tone was supposed to be Please, help yourself
first, here's why... here's ALL of the resources I use
to help myself. I've successfully been able to keep
questions about Samba to this list down to a minimum
by first consulting all of my
Chris,
I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you
believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going
unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions.
Well, how do you know that there are enough people on the
mailing list that
Martin Pool wrote:
On 13 Feb 2003, Neal Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, i dont , feel that the newbies comment was in the spirit of the
open source, This list is here to help people, and if sombody is
asking a question, its part of the opensource comunity's responsibilty
to try to
--- Robert Adkins II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read a few more of your responses. It
appears that you
believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced
questions are going
unanswered simply because of the volume of lower
skilled questions.
That was but one of the 5 points I was making.
Dear Group,
it is not possible that nobody encountered my problem:
I'm using samba as PDC and all works fine but i want to do a thing that it
is not explained in any samba manual i could found in Internet.
Under WinNT when you create a new user there is the checkbox that allows
the new user to
I'm a bit of a samba newbie, but I've googled all morning for an answer
before posing this question.
I'm using winbind to authenticate telnet user logins against my PDC. (Yes, I
know - I'll be switching to ssh shortly :-)
Anyways, I was wondering if there is a way to eliminate the need to enter
Well I finally had time to look at this and I think I found the problem. When
glibc passes a buffer to winbind to hold the group membership the buffer is
too small. fill_grent() in libnss_winbind rightfully returns NSS_TRYAGAIN
and sets errno to ERANGE. This *should* make glibc realloc the
I think if you add - 'winbind use default domain = Yes' - that should do the trick.
Thank you
Jenn Fountain
-Original Message-
From: Chris Merkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Samba] Winbind login names
I'm a
--- David Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short version: I think it's a problem with RedHat
8's glibc and not Samba.
I've submitted a report to Bugzilla as I'm not
tinkering with glibc on a server! :)
And I don't know enough about glibc to tinker, either.
I had a hunch it was a RedHat
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allori Lorenzo wrote:
Dear Group,
I'm using samba as PDC and all works fine but i want to do a thing that it
is not explained in any samba manual i could found in Internet.
Under WinNT when you create a new user there is the checkbox that allows
the new user to change
Hi,
I need one copy of one src samba package. I try with samba-2.2.7, download from Samba
site, but it not work. Somebody cant tell something about.
Amilkar
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Am 14 Feb 2003 um 15:52 hat Buchan Milne geschrieben:
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:37:53 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Rutzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] domain users in local groups with Winbind/Samba/Redhat
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
Has anyone seen this?
When I run ./wbinfo -s $sid (insert actual sid), I get domain+domain users 2. Every
group has a '2' after it. I cannot find why this is happening anywhere??? I am
running samba 2.2.7a on hpux11.
Thank you
Jenn Fountain
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Amilkar --
I'm not sure what you are asking for. The samba source package is a
little to big for email. Try this link:
http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/samba-latest.tar.gz
Is that what you were asking?
Amilkar Sanz Lara wrote:
Hi,
I need one copy of one src samba package. I try with
O email [EMAIL PROTECTED] foi alterado para [EMAIL PROTECTED], entretanto a
sua mensagem foi redirecionada para o novo email.
Atenciosamente,
American BankNote Ltda
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 14 Feb 2003 um 15:52 hat Buchan Milne geschrieben:
valid users = @localgroup @'Domain1+group1'
My experiences with Samba in domains are not very big. So, what does
'Domain1+group1'
mean?
Domain1 = any Domain in my Network or the Domain which Samba has
Well, I got this to work once by manually editing the /etc/group file, like
adding the line:
localgroup:x:gid: domain+user1,domain+user2,etc
I don't know if this is a safe thing to do, however. :)
Dave
On Friday 14 February 2003 03:37 am, Matthias Rutzki wrote:
Hi,
I am running a Samba
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:25:01 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] How to join a linux machine to a pure Active
DirectoryDomain using Samba 3.0alpha21?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: 20030214130008$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- David Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I got this to work once by manually editing
the /etc/group file, like
adding the line:
localgroup:x:gid: domain+user1,domain+user2,etc
I don't know if this is a safe thing to do, however.
:)
I don't believe you can safely manually edit
In one of your replies to the attention newbies...
series, you mentioned you teach a linux newbie class.
I'm interested (seriously, or sarcasm) in checking out
one of your seminars. Where do I get information?
Brad Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do
Can I actually create a Domain Users group on my samba server and add
users to it like I did with the Domain Admins group? That would be easier
than adding each user individually on each folder that they need to
access... (It's always easier to add DOMAIN\Domain Users instead of
DOMAIN\User1
According to the docs of v2.2.7, domain groups are not
supported at this time.
What I've done and my env btw is;
Samba PDC
Samba file servers
XP/2K/Linux/MacOSX clients
Created some groups in /etc/group and assigned users
in /etc/passwd to the appropriate groups.
Then in my smb.conf file I
Hello,
I'm trying to open an Access application on two NT workstations with the
result that one of them fails to open with the following error message:
Could not lock file
smbstatus reports the file like this (on both machines)
13769 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, lrnobs wrote:
John,
I posted the following to the Samba list with no replies yet. Can you point
me in the right direction?
Larry,
I noticed your posting but am very pushed to get some presentations ready
so have have had to watch my time carefully.
Samba does not do
I would look at oplocks and turning it off on certain
files or dirs. Run testparm on your smb.conf to see
how Samba is configured.
Bri-
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
--
To
what do the following values in local.h do with respect to a single smbd
or are they absolute limits? please explain...
#define MAX_DIRECTORY_HANDLES 2048
#define MAX_OPEN_DIRECTORIES 256
#define MAX_OPEN_PIPES 2048
Thank you!
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
Samba-Persons,
Could someone help me with the location of a specific
'how-to' to get samba up and running on Solaris 9 (64bit). Or any other
info on the subject.
_:-)
Paul Ketelaar, Assoc. Dip. Eng. (Elec)
Paul Ketelaar - ITT and WWW Design
--- Brad Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In one of your replies to the attention newbies...
series, you mentioned you teach a linux newbie
class.
I'm interested (seriously, or sarcasm) in checking
out
one of your seminars. Where do I get information?
A few other JaxLUG members and I are
I got this working with the following patch. I'm not sure
if this is the cleanest possible fix, but it works for me.
-hal
--- samba-2.2.7a-dist/examples/VFS/audit.c Tue Dec 10
09:57:59 2002
+++ samba-2.2.7a/examples/VFS/audit.c Fri Feb 14 10:50:18 2003
@@ -288,36 +288,48 @@
int
i have installed samba 3.0 with kerberos and openldap
library , in my smb.conf i put
realm=DOMAIN.COM
security=ads
..
but when i try to authenticate with acitve directoey
server i have in my log samba
NT status wrong password
excuse me for my english
and thank you
Does the param domain group map still exist? if not, what has replaced it?
I ran a testparm on my smb.conf it and says that it is an unrecognized
parameter.
Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I ran a testparm on my smb.conf
testparm is a good tool. If certain options are
incorrect or depreciated then this is the best way to
find out.
I'd do a google search as thats how I fixed most of my
probs.
Bri-
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my Linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share and placed them in the Linux
group on the samba server. I gave
the group full rights to the samba
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my Linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share and placed them in the Linux
group on the samba server. I gave
the group full rights to the samba
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my Linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share and placed them in the Linux
group on the samba server. I gave
the group full rights to the samba
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share on the samba server. I gave
the group the rights to the samba share, but when a user adds to the
How can I setup the share so only
the group owns it no
matter what user in the group adds to the share the
group maintains the
permissions
under shares do;
force group =
Bri-
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Kenni wrote about '[Samba] pdb-mysql HOWTO':
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find a tutorial about pdb-mysql ?
I always checked
http://us2.samba.org/samba/ftp/cvs_current/docs/htmldocs/pdb-mysql.html, but
It seems to be a little bit complicated for
--- juan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server
to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my
linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share on
the samba server. I gave
the group the rights to the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I setup the share so only
the group owns it no
matter what user in the group adds to the share
the
group maintains the
permissions
under shares do;
force group =
I forgot about that.. it works well, too (:
Sgid is more flexible and works in
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 03:58, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allori Lorenzo wrote:
Dear Group,
I'm using samba as PDC and all works fine but i want to do a thing that it
is not explained in any samba manual i could found in Internet.
Under WinNT when you create a new
O email [EMAIL PROTECTED] foi alterado para [EMAIL PROTECTED], entretanto a
sua mensagem foi redirecionada para o novo email.
Atenciosamente,
American BankNote Ltda
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Brian M Hoy wrote:
Summary
The second point happens, because the PC will _occasionally_ use a
different DC to authenticate against (it's secure channel partner in MS
parlance). If it just so happens to change its machine account password
with this SCP, then the machine's domain membership is
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:56:19AM +0800, David wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your kindly reply.
So, you mean I should add a guest account
to my unix system? Such as: pcguest?
You probably already have one. It is called 'guest'
or 'nobody' in Linux distributions.
Commonly, leaving 'guest account'
Help, please
I have a several WinXP (w/o any SP, Russian) in Samba domain. Trouble: WinXP cann't
load roaming profile.
Workaround: add current user to local group Administrators.
Working fine.
Yesterday several WinXP SP1 Eng was installed.
Trouble: WinXP cann't load roaming profile.
Check the sPNMappings attribute: looks like the Windows 2000 KDC maps a
number of things to HOST:
dn: cn=Directory Service,cn=Windows NT,cn=Services,cn=Configuration,dc=xad-0,d
c=padl,dc=com
sPNMappings: host=alerter,appmgmt,cisvc,clipsrv,browser,dhcp,dnscache,replicat
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Luke Howard wrote:
Check the sPNMappings attribute: looks like the Windows 2000 KDC maps a
number of things to HOST:
dn: cn=Directory Service,cn=Windows NT,cn=Services,cn=Configuration,dc=xad-0,d
c=padl,dc=com
sPNMappings:
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 01:24, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
witch samba version are you using?
2.2.7a
BTW: there are no files attached to your mail...
They were attached, I will attach them again
metze
-
Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 01:24, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
BTW: there are no files attached to your mail...
They were attached, I will attach them again
Nope. None again. But looking in the headers:
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
The mailing list
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 10:37, Illtud Daniel wrote:
Nope. None again. But looking in the headers:
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
The mailing list stripped the attachments (as it should, IMHO!).
Can't you send diff patches for the changes you made?
The diff for pdb_ldap.c is:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13 Feb 2003, Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
Hi all. I have been implementing a Windows Domain using Samba and LDAP
and noticed that when validating a workstation, Samba would only check
the /etc/passwd file and not LDAP. I changed the pdb_ldap.c and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Feb 2003, Brian M Hoy wrote:
If you believe the MS document, then the Samba BDC should pass the
machine account password change request to the PDC. That would be nice!
If you are using read-only replicas for Samba BDCs then the password
what do the following values in local.h do with respect to a single smbd
or are they absolute limits? please explain...
#define MAX_DIRECTORY_HANDLES 2048
#define MAX_OPEN_DIRECTORIES 256
#define MAX_OPEN_PIPES 2048
Thank you!
Bill
Hello Hal,
thanks for coding this patch, unfortunately it doesn't work for me.
Checking the generated network packets with ethereal shows that the
NT_NOTIFY packet I receive on the Windwows side
is invalid. The packet (frame size as shown in ethereal) is much too
short, it's size is 93 bytes,
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 01:30, Nik Conwell wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 23:32, Nik Conwell wrote:
Anybody seeing a scenario like this?
net ads join adds our machine entry to AD just fine.
The machine entry object in the AD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, my feelings on Samba in the kernel are the following.
1). We need to be able to de-multiplex incoming SMB's at the kernel
level to get over the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Shirish Kalele wrote:
In init_unistr2, the string length for the UNISTR2 structure seems to
be set equal to the number of bytes occupied by the string when
encoded in the Unix charset (i.e. the value returned by strlen()).
Thanks for clearing that up.
I took a look at the log for the file and saw that tridge expected the
'len' argument to init_unistr2() to be the character length, not the byte
length of the string. So it appears the callers will have to be fixed, not
the function as I thought.
Would be good to
Hi Tim,
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2003 21:52 schrieb Tim Potter:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 08:28:55PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Hello Hal,
thanks for coding this patch, unfortunately it doesn't work for me.
Checking the generated network packets with ethereal shows that the
NT_NOTIFY
When I run OPLOCK2 smbtorture test against a CIFS server, I don't see smbtorture
responding
to oplock break request from CIFS server, any idea about this problem?
Sri
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
When I run OPLOCK2 smbtorture test against a CIFS server, I don't see smbtorture
responding
to oplock break request from CIFS server, any idea about this problem?
So, are you observing this on the wire?
Which version of smbtorture are you using?
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 02:22, Vincent Sanders wrote:
Hi I have recently had cause to cross compile samba 2.2.7a from x86 to
arm uclibc linux. During the make i have come across a problem with
the int32 macro definition in /include/includes.h (line 459) the check
works out everything to do with
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
actually it looks quite good :-)
That's good to hear!
Attached is a capture from two W2K machines talking to each other.
Packet No. 19 shows the NT NOTIFY response packet.
This capture was made using the Windows version of
Hi,
In libsmb/clispnego.c, in spnego_gen_krb5_wrap, there is the following
piece of code:
asn1_push_tag(data, ASN1_APPLICATION(0));
asn1_write_OID(data, OID_KERBEROS5);
asn1_write_BOOLEAN(data, 0);
asn1_write(data, ticket.data, ticket.length);
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to link the JYC version samba-2.2.7a on a VAX/VMS-7.1 without any C compiler.
The link script gives me the following error messages :
$ @link_vax smbd
Linking SMBD
%LINK-W-NUDFSYMS, 1 undefined symbol:
%LINK-I-UDFSYM, DECC$FCNTL
Please make sure that your out of office responders on your e-mail are
not responding to mail that arrives from mailing lists.
I just received several of these from my last post.
Thanks,
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
Date: Fri Feb 14 10:47:07 2003
Author: abartlet
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13692/libsmb
Modified Files:
cliconnect.c smbencrypt.c
Log Message:
Further extract our NTLMv2 code into smbencrypt.c, prior to merge into our
NTLMSSP
That's what I fear as it is easy to misunderstand the code and introduce
errors later, anyway, it was just a question, nothing to lose too much
time on.
Simo.
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 20:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:58:19AM +0100, Simo wrote:
Jeremy why did you used an
Date: Fri Feb 14 13:23:36 2003
Author: mimir
Update of /home/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30160
Modified Files:
team.html
Log Message:
Updated team members contact with one address.
Rafal
Revisions:
team.html 1.29 = 1.30
Date: Fri Feb 14 19:42:54 2003
Author: jmcd
Update of /home/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5584
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
configure.in
Log Message:
Bring in line with HEAD version...mostly formatting changes to clean up diffs.
Revisions:
Date: Fri Feb 14 20:10:43 2003
Author: jmcd
Update of /home/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8163
Modified Files:
Makefile.in
Log Message:
Put dynrpc modules as part of make all, when specified in configure.
Revisions:
Makefile.in 1.612 = 1.613
Date: Fri Feb 14 20:19:50 2003
Author: jmcd
Update of /home/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8813
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
Makefile.in
Log Message:
Put dynrpc modules as part of make all, when specified in configure.
Revisions:
Makefile.in
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
