On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:04:20PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Hello!
There is following problem:
if I open excel file from one computer and then try to open it from
another excel says (translation from russian)-
editing is prohibited by user X.
Previously (at least with samba 3.0.2a)
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 06:04:41PM -0500, Gary MacKay wrote:
I'm very sorry to email you directly, but I've sent this question to the
list at least 6 times and not a single response. I even tried to be nasty
once just to see if that would draw a response. Nothing. I have a client
that is
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:01:10AM +0100, Urs Rau wrote:
Jeremy or Nathan,
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, I have a working theory for this. It concerns ACLs and what
happens when excel wants to update the filetime on a file the user
doesn't own.
Normally you just set the dos filetime
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
No confirmation over here, havn't had a chance to compile a new copy -
rolled back to 3.0.8 for the time being it's been less buggy but still have
occasional file(s) locking up.
A little unclear here, do I need to add a patch
Hi all Samba OS/2 users. I've just added OS/2 style
extended attribute support into the SAMBA_3_0 subversion
branch code.
This depends on the underlying OS supporting EA's and
(on linux) the filesystem being mounted with the user_xattr
mount option and the parameter ea support = yes being set
in
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:20:30PM +0100, Mac wrote:
Hi all,
We're at the preliminary stages of investigating this, but I
can't find any references to it on a Google etc.
Anyway. We've just moved from 3.0.6 to 3.0.13 and users report a file
being missing.
On investigation it
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:30:29AM +0800, Adrian Chow wrote:
Hi,
My samba is 3.0.13 version.
I got a funny problem. UserA logs on to a shared (all users can
read/write/execute rights) drive and opens an excel file. UserA closes the
file or modifies it. When UserA reopens the file in
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:11:01PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
Hey there,
I am, for the first time, playing around with Samba seriously (mainly
thinking about replacing NFS with it). I'm using a Linux 2.6.x client
with the cifs.ko kernel module/filesystem type.
I've found that I can't
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 02:30:36PM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Still experiencing two issues here; we get smbd processes that seem hung-out
and climb to 99% CPU utilization... While there, the end-user's PC seems to
spawn a new smbd process and cannot access the MS Office file (sometimes
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Hi all Samba OS/2 users. I've just added OS/2 style
extended attribute support into the SAMBA_3_0 subversion
branch code.
This depends on the underlying OS supporting EA's and
(on linux) the filesystem
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Can you send me a debug level 10
Here it is, but it doesn't look useful:
[2005/04/05 23:36:33, 0] smbd/server.c:main(798)
smbd version 3.0.14pre1-SVN-build-6200 started.
Copyright Andrew
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 07:48:08AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Now (after applying patch from Jeremy), most of the problems with Excel and
user's files being locked have quit. However, we're still getting some files
locked out when a given smbd process hangs, it appears as though the process
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:50:27PM -0700, James Affeld wrote:
So to recap: I need to dig information out of a
running process smbd, which does not have any children
spawned, and find out what it is doing/trying to do.
Thanks for any pointers.
I'm attaching a patch for a bug in 3.0.13
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:23:11PM +0200, Anders Troback wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list so bare with me!
Running samba-3.0.12 on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE.
I did uppgrade from 3.0.10 to 3.0.12 and now lots of my users have
problems accesing their home folder on that server. If I look at the
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:44:00PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, I've taken a look at this and what happens is the client
creates the file AUTOEXEC.BAT and then tries to set a couple of
EA's on it using a trans2 setfilepathinfo with an info level of 2
(SET_EA
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 05:40:56PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
I haven't seen a solution yet, but here's what I'm running into:
3.0.13 with Winbind on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3, compiled with
--with-pam as well as attempts with that and --with-acl-support - note
that though the samba
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:12:05PM -0500, Zach Seils wrote:
Thanks Jerry. Any plans to add support for NT_Create_AndX is the
future?
It's already in the client libraries, the standard cli_open()
function just needs to be changed under the covers. It's actually
not that difficult to do.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:02:16AM +0100, Blane Bramble wrote:
Hi, we are using Samba as a network attached storage server for our web-
servers, and have an oddity with Windows 2003/IIS6 where some of the
sites seem to lose their connection for short periods of time (up to
about 1/2 an hour at
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:56:33PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
If you SVN checkout it should be fixed now. Sorry for the problem.
No problem and many thanks.
Now I was able to compile, but I get exactly the same behaviour as
before: with ea support turned on, I
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:47:59PM -0500, david rankin wrote:
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zach Seils wrote:
| Hi -
|
| Is there a way to tell Samba to use the NT_Create_AndX
| style of commands (vs SMB_COM_OPEN)?
In
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:39:35AM +0100, Urs Rau wrote:
I am using 3.0.13 and have temporarily run out of disk space on the main
samba server, so I have NFS mounted some space from another machine.
into a directory that is accessible under samba.
When I try to save directly from ms word
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 07:53:32AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
After killing an smbd process, or occasionally after a process has died
itself, there remains a lock as indicated in an smbstatus output.
The process ID tied to the file lock in the db is no longer active, yet the
db entry still
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:58:40AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Since applying the two patches you emailed me (one for cpu load, one for MS
Excel issues):
All is working fine now except MS Word; don't know if it's entirely related
or a separate issue all together, but figured I'd post the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 08:11:59AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Okay, but then if the process signals back that is in fact not there, why
then do the locks remain?
No, the smbd process that detected the problem should then remove that entry.
I killed all smbd processes last night, and
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 08:13:34AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 12:56 -0400, David Girard wrote:
OK, I have applied the use spnego=no and it seems to have resolved the
problem...
Could you describe what this setting is doing?...I haven't been able
to find any
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:18:19AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
We should not need that - the NTLMSSP and SPNEGO code does not use piles
of static variables, it's just the one context that is the problem.
All you need to do is change 'global_ntlmssp_state' into something keyed
off that
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:19:24AM +0200, Anders Troback wrote:
Hi,
I looks like smbd hangs if the file name contains stange characters!
More details would be helpful :-).
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:14:23PM -0400, Cale Fairchild wrote:
I have looked into this further and need to ammend the reported problems.
It seems that on servers which have issues regarding this problem it was
introduced with version 3.0.12 not 3.0.13.
Interestingly enough I installed it
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:52:46AM +0200, Anders Troback wrote:
Sorry for the bad input:-(
It looks like if a folder contains lots of files with names (ls -w on
the BSD box) like \303\204NDRINGAR ENLIGT NY STD.doc or
milj\224prov.doc the smbd hangs for that user and a new session starts
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:23:13AM +1000, Grant Bigham wrote:
I have an issue with W2K/XP using Folder Redirection to a Samba homes share
(or any share for that matter). This is only a problem when access for a
user is via an ACE (ACL) and not the traditional file system permissions.
So for
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Bruno Guerreiro wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having exactly the same problem.
If using samba-3.0.13 without ACL's, everything goes perfect.
ACL's on causes the file to get marked read only.
Applied the Patch for MS Excel... No results.
Any ideas?
If you
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 02:45:47PM -0400, Lalonde, Donald: CORP wrote:
HI,
We have noticed problems with Samba and McAffee Netshield.
When Netshield is installed on a Novell server, I can't copy files
to my Samba dir. The file is created with a 0kb size.
If I remove Netshield, then
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:15:26PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
Jacob Nielsen wrote:
Hello list
I have the same problem with my Samba-3.0.13. This problem started after
upgrading from 3.0.11.
I have a rather huge fileserver with 300.000+ files, so this is kindda a
big issue for
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
The problem is totally reproducible across different boxes here and even
using the most very basic of a smb.conf. User schaefer should be able to
connect to his home share, go into his tmp/crap/ folder and create,
modify, and
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:27:29PM -0400, Cale Fairchild wrote:
Thanks for another quick response, I have done some poking in the code and
found that the cause of the problem for the missing file is that in the
function get_lanman2_dir_entry in trans2.c, dname returns false on the last
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
The problem is totally reproducible across different boxes here and even
using the most very basic of a smb.conf. User schaefer should be able to
connect to his home share, go into his tmp/crap/ folder and create,
modify, and
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:48:29PM +0200, Anders Trobäck wrote:
I love to if I just know how, not used to debuging...can you give me a
hint? Please!
Compile with -g to ensure you have symbols in place. Add the following
line to the smb.conf global section :
panic action = /bin/sleep 9
to
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:49:10PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
User jeremy can create/delete and modify files from a cmd.exe shell
and Windows explorer to his hearts content, no problems.
The difference is that you gave write permissions to user jeremy. In
the other example, permissions
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:29:58PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Tom Schaefer wrote:
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.
but what permissions do the _files_ have that you can no
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:18:59PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I still have the bug after upgrading to 3.0.14a
logfile
[2005/04/15 16:18:28, 10] smbd/statcache.c:stat_cache_lookup(243)
stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [CBBSP/CBBSP6/NEW TEXT
DOCUMENT.TXT] -
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:31:40PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I'm starting to think this is the cause of the problems for people.
I can check this by compiling without acl support and seeing if I
can reproduce the bug.
Yep - confirmed it. For the people who are reporting this bug, you're
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:43:34PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
Solaris guy here.
Since my last posting I HAVE managed to replicate this problem with
3.0.14a on Linux. Red Hat Enterprise Advanced Server version 3 to be
exact.
Although I did not specify --with-acl-support as a configure
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:31:35PM +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
Hello again list
Here is my output from configure 3.0.13:
g-file root # grep -i acl samba.log
* myconf is: --with-acl-support --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
--disable-cups --with-ldap --without-ldapsam --with-quotas
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:49:47PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
Ignoring the minor issue of the created files perms not matching
the force create mode (I know it's now an OR thing that I can fix), I
should still be able to delete this file, as I've been forced to the
mysql group
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
Sigh. Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.
I set it up like this...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash#
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:30:22AM +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
Hello list
I have the same problem with my Samba-3.0.13. This problem started after
upgrading from 3.0.11.
I have a rather huge fileserver with 300.000+ files, so this is kindda a
big issue for me.
Problem is when
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:16:24AM -0500, Samba wrote:
Running Samba 3.0.13 on SLES8. I have the following errors in
log.winbind does anyone have any ideas on what is wrong?
[2005/04/15 02:30:00, 0] sam/idmap_rid.c:rid_idmap_get_id_from_sid(476)
rid_idmap_get_id_from_sid: no suitable
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:29:31PM -0500, Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
I'm modifying what I wrote this morning. Compiling --with-acl-support DOES
fix the problem on Linux. Jeremy is right. Although I had compiled it that
way this morning I was accidentally running one of my earlier
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:42:33PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I've changed defaults in /etc/fstab for the affected partition
to defaults,acl,user_xattr and rebooted the box. I've gone so far as
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:42:33PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I've changed defaults in /etc/fstab for the affected partition
to defaults,acl,user_xattr and rebooted the box. I've gone so far as
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 03:42:25PM +1000, taso wrote:
I don't know if a Win32 Samba client is feasible because I don't
know enough about client-side Win32 networking. Does the list
have any opinions/comments?
This is something we've discussed at the CIFS conferences.
Take a look at the AFS
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:41:32PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 04:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 03:42:25PM +1000, taso wrote:
I don't know if a Win32 Samba client is feasible because I don't
know enough about client-side Win32
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:41:06PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
I have yet to get it work properly on Solaris. I'm in the process of
putting together a level 10 debug log and anything else I think
might be useful for him and sending it off to Jeremy. Jeremy had
suggested that the patch he
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:35:12PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
The log file helped. Try this patch (applies against
raw 3.0.14a). Problem was Solaris was returning 2 in a
place I expected a 1
Jeremy.
Index: smbd/posix_acls.c
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:06:01AM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I've tried 3.0.14a this morning with --with-acl-support and it wasn't
working. I've applied your patch to posix_acls.c, rebuild everything from
scratch and the problem persist.
I need more info than your log file shows I'm
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:07:45PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
I will be able to give you the info tomorrow after 07:30 EDT, just ask for
what you need.
As I said to jerry, we are running on AIX (4.3.3, 5.2 and 5.3 soon). Samba
is used to access DFS fileserver which has its own extended
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:02:12PM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
Hello,
I've kind of been hanging with Peter on this whole issue so didn't want to
just abandon him when Jeremy issued the Solaris patch that fixed things
for me.
I went and took a hard look at bug report 2619 that Peter filed
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:09:05PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
thanks, I just added a comment to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619 that shows my recent
findings. It looks like not directly related to ACLs, but more
with store dos attributes. I still have the feeling
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:47:11AM -0500, Tom Schaefer wrote:
As for the read only attribute on a file, I think if the user group
combination on who's behalf Samba is acting would have the ability to
write to the file where they sitting at a UNIX shell then the read only
flag should not be
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 05:23:19PM +1000, James Peach wrote:
On 4/20/05, Cale Fairchild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patch, unfortunately when I installed it I had a lot more
files missing from the directory listing and I have not taken much time to
look at why. But it certainly
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:55:21AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have a question about samba3 internals.
I want to know if samba does support what I call transactions (though I
could be wrong)
I need that a client either finish writing what it was meant to or not
The problem is
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 07:25:39PM +0100, Martin Wilson wrote:
I am involved in the support of a digital audio editing and production system
involving Windows 2k clients storing the audio assets on an AIX backend. The
problem we have been experiencing is that we open audio files in the editor
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:55:56AM +0200, Thomas Werner wrote:
no, it doesnt work :( i tested it with:
samba-3.0.11-acl (still broken, fails after some try's to save an excel
file)
samba-3.0.13-acl (still broken, same behavior )
samba-3.0.13-noacl (seems to work)
always the same
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:00:36PM +0200, Mesterhazy Attila wrote:
hi,
we use samba as fileserver. i always download and install
the newest version of it to keep the system up-to-date. but
now i have a problem. i've updated to 3.0.14a. after it i
can not start an old DOS program, because it
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:31:03PM -0700, Travis Knabe wrote:
Received the following messages ( scrolling ) in the log.smbd:
users could not access the samba server. had to stop the samba daemons.
ran a ps -ef | grep smb
found many smbd processes running. had to pkill the process, and
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:33:11PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I know that you're a very busy guy, but I've CC you on this post a few days
ago and didn't get any answer.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2005-April/040377.html
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:00:29AM +0200, Annette Bitz wrote:
Hi!
I always get the following messages. What does this mean?
smbd[20233]: [2005/04/27 09:58:13, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(384)
smbd[20233]: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset
by peer
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 05:52:58AM +0300, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 04:48:09 +0300 (EEST) Nerijus Baliunas [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using 3.0.15pre2.
Patch from MORIYAMA Masayuki in bug 2346 helped. Why isn't it
applied and bug is closed? If it was fixed in some
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:20:49PM -0700, Li, Ying (ESG) wrote:
I've finally found out how to use roaming profiles in domain level.
Samba2.2 and 3.0 always checks owner's ACL for profile directories. But
Samba returns correct owner ACL in a little bit different format with
Windows. For
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:21:03AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Using Samba 3.0.11, dir immediately returns all files and folders;
Using 3.0.14 dir hangs and never returns anything. Connecting to a
share of smaller size works normally.
Drat, I installed 3.0.14 on the test rig yesterday and
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:53:20AM -0400, Mark Ratering wrote:
I have a samba server set up with a few shares and about 5 different
users. My issue is this: Whenever the admin user writes a new file to
the 'data' share the unix permissions become admin, admin. Then the
guys in sales cant
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:20:03PM +0200, Hans Otto Lunde wrote:
Hi Federico
I have the same problems that you describe.
Using force group with Samba 3.0.14a casues problems as
described by you and me (see force group broken in 3.0.14 in the
May archive) for Win XP Pro SP2 clients.
Win 98
Hi all,
I can make a simple change to smbd for the next stable
release that will cause POSIX ACLs to be checked before returning
the DOS mode of a file is read-only. This will fix the case
that people are complaining about where a POSIX ACL allows write
access to a file but the standard
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:40:05PM -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
Hi, John. I'm pretty sure I get what oplocks are for and why they are
good, I guess my question would be more along the lines of do they work
properly in samba? along with the error message that prompts the
question.
They work as
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Brandon Lederer wrote:
My comment/question leans towards Windows here I cant turn oplocks off
in Windows (to my knowledge). Therefore they are always ON. If this is the
case, And they dont cause any problems, then WHY do we have to turn them off
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:27:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I disabled oplocks after weeks of corrupt files during
network renders amongst 80+ cpus using XP Pro.
Disabling oplocks fixed my corrupt file issue however
I suspect that my choice of using XP Pro in a serious
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:54:44AM -0400, Eric N. Moyer wrote:
I am working with a Raidzone tech to solve a problem with our Raidzone
NAS. The tech told me he has not yet posted to any Samba list about this,
and gave me permission to do so.
Using XCOPY from either NT4SP6a or W2KSP3, over
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:08:02PM +0200, Vizitiu, Ciprian wrote:
... By my mistake a 2.2.8a-1 running on RH8 was exposed to the Internet. It
was cracked in a matter of hours. I noticed it because they've deleted my
smbd. :-|
I'm ready to reinstall the machine, if there are any logs that
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:42:40PM -0400, Eric N. Moyer wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I have asked the Raidzone tech for a copy of
their Samba source, and we are also investigating network issues. Another
thing we are doing is testing the large file copies on a spare Linux
system, for
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:08:30AM +0200, Simon wrote:
Hi,
I have DOS program and I have to move it from Novell to Samba server.
In Novell program locks file all but DENY READ : 0 so that other clients can read
file
and if one client is reading file, other can write to it.
I would like
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:18:34PM -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote:
(Some more info)
I have a FreeBSD server running Samba 2.2.8 now (updated from 2.2.7).. I've
turned log levels to 10... I have a user who needs this machine to do her
job, and she uses Mac OS X, the latest 10.2 updates have been
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:47:26AM +0530, Saugata Das wrote:
This is regarding the IOCTL command which is part of the SMB commands, We
are currently referring to the CIFS document for information on the various
SMB commands, but we are unable to get any information regarding the IOCTL
commands
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:38:46AM -0300, Mohamed Elbeshti wrote:
Hi Jeremy
How r u ?
I found in the server box samba ver 2.0.7 running with RH6.2 -kerenel
2.2.14-. Is it possible to upgrade the old version samba to samba 2.2.0
or higher?
Yes this should be possible if you compile from
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:20:12PM +1000, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
I'm having performance problems that seem to involve SAMBA in the
equation so I thought I'd ask if there was something obvious I'm
stuffing up or a known anomoly.
A mate of mine runs MYOB Premier (the brilliant (not!) multi-user
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Helga Mayer wrote:
Did anybody succeed to compile samba-3.0.0beta2 with afs ?
I get the following errors:
Linking bin/smbd
auth/pass_check.o: In function `afs_auth':
source/auth/pass_check.c:50: undefined reference to `setpag'
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:39:55PM +0800, Kovalenko I.A. wrote:
Hello!
I use samba - 2.2.1a-4 , my OS Linux RedHat 7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10.I have problem on
Windows clients. Windows clients execute different task by FoxPro, shared databases
files (dbf) locate in Samba server.Some users process
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:42:11AM +0200, Thilo Rößler wrote:
This seems to be a bug ... have a look here:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229
I just fixed this in SAMBA_3_0 CVS. Please checkout and re-test.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:12:05PM -0700, Clark Mr Philip wrote:
Ok folks,
Here is the deal. I have posted to the news groups several times and gotten
not a single thing. I have been trying since march to get 2.2.8a working on
sol2.5.1 with winbind to do the authentication but it has failed
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:15:47AM -0700, Clark Mr Philip wrote:
Thought of that also but they no longer support 2.5.1 and the Marines are
kind of cheap in that respect.
Well it's difficult to help without some commitment from
the Marines and Sun not supporting 2.5.1 :-(. Can you post a truss
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:27:44PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
As another example, I had a mozilla installer sitting in a directory on
the share--no one but me would have touched it. Last used ~1 month ago.
Tried it today and it was corrupt.
I personally have only seen corruption in
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:56:31PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
Ok, I added the auditing module to my main share. As a test I
redownloaded the mozilla installer and put it in it's own directory on
the samba share. I took a md5 immediately after downloading it. I then
tried installing to
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:42:20AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs.
We have csv reports that are created on a unix server automatically via a
cron job. We are looking at putting these reports in a shared area / work
out a way of sharing a unix device to windows machine like mapping
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:11:45PM -0700, D. Rick Anderson wrote:
I'm having a strange problem with Samba 2.2.8 on RH 9.0.
When I delete a folder on the server from a workstation, it gives me an
error saying that it can't be found and the folder remains in Explorer,
but if I look on the
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:24:38PM +0700, Beast wrote:
However, it seems that passwd program was runs as user who invoke
this program (ie. change his password form Win client) and *not* as
root.
Tested using samba3.0b3 and ldap backend.
I've fixed this in the SAMBA_3_0 CVS - it'll be fixed
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:23:19AM +0200, Marcus Blomenkamp wrote:
Hi,
'smbd' and 'nmbd' do behave well however 'smbclient' does not, so some of the
other binaries neither i suppose.
I just fixed this in SAMBA_3_0 CVS. Please check out and tell me
if other binaries have this problem.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:20:22AM +0200, Patrik Gustavsson PS Sweden Senior Technical
Consultant wrote:
Hi,
I have joined a ADS (W2003 server) with success.
Started winbindd.
When I run any wbinfo commands I recieve the following message
in the logfile and the command fails:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 07:28:41PM -0500, PHELPS, SCOTT wrote:
I am so stoked I just had to share this with y'all.
I just SEAMLESSLY migrated all of my machines and users over to my new
Gentoo Linux Server.
I even kept the same: domain name and old PDC NetBios name.
The trickiest part was
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:28:52AM -0700, Mr eric salayon wrote:
hi,
i tried files on my samba server just this afternoon
because my novell netware server bug down. As i copied
the said files for some time, an error occured that
says i cannot continue copying files. Heres my logs:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Stefano Del Negro wrote:
Please, can you help me?
I'm tryng again...
I'll probably give up and use MS Backup from Win2000 to SMB shares instead of using
smbtar.
I hope somebody will tell me what to do.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Mark Cooke
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:02:47AM +0200, Peter Eckhardt wrote:
Ok, sometimes SuSe does strange things when configuring packages. So I
got samba-2.2.8a and recompiled it with only the necessary options.
Installed it, rebooted and everyhing was fine again. Until ... no, the
next morning it
601 - 700 of 7604 matches
Mail list logo
