Hi there,
we need to implement the following scenario:
- Samba server 3.0.22 (NOT acting as a domain controller; we don't use
Windows networking domains)
- users use Linux and Windoze
- anonymous users accessing a certain share should be granted read-only
access
- successfully authenticated
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:00:24 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back
again. :-(
Thanks nevertheless. As one resort, could you try
use mmap = no
I guess I should
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:34:16 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
What exactly does that mean? I compiled Samba with large file support.
Was this an error? I absolutely NEED large-file support. (To recap, this
is under Debian/GNU Linux/i386 3.0
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:50:50 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
[...]
you do not have a *very* good reason to enable them, could you please retry
without spinlocks?
Ok, I'm just recompiling Samba without spinlock support.
Obviously I have to wait until this night so that the fileserver becomes less
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:20:26 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
[...]
Looks like the tdb went over the 4Gb line. As a quick work around,
Stop nmbd; rm /var/run/samba/unexpected.tdb; and start nmbd back up.
No, this has never been a work-around. The problem comes up again VERY quickly.
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
The system in question is a Debian i386 stable (3.0) system, kernel is
2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in
use
for shares exported via Samba!!), Samba is 2.2.7a (a Debian package that I
created
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:37:17 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Why should Samba be the ONLY (apparent) application that doesn't feel hap=
py with=20
XFS over EVMS?
I'm running Samba on XFS+EVMS (on Debian ;) with no problems. Even on
buggy versions of XFS, I've never seen this error; I don't
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
you can try to delete unexpected.tdb
it does not hold any vital information.
The problem has reappeared even after I removed
Hi there,
since I upgraded our fileserver running Debian 3.0/i386 with Samba 2.2.7a (a
package I created myself) I'm seeing the following messages in syslog:
Jan 28 14:55:50 Fileserver nmbd[22451]: [2003/01/28 14:55:50, 0]
tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531)
Jan 28 14:55:50 Fileserver nmbd[22451]:
On Wed, 29 May 2002 08:51:06 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
[...]
Compiling smbd/quotas.c
smbd/quotas.c: In function `get_smb_linux_vfs_quota':
smbd/quotas.c:111: storage size of `D' isn't known
make[1]: *** [smbd/quotas.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/samba-2.2.4/source'
make:
10 matches
Mail list logo
