[Samba] security = problems

2003-04-03 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
Is there a way to have users of the samba server, but not add them by smbpasswd -a UserID? I want the samba server to be a domain member and the users to only authentic from the PDC. These are the steps that I have attempted: Users are in both the Windows domain and the UNIX NIS account 1.

Re: [Samba] security = problems

2003-04-03 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
We are not using a WAN for the Samba connections, so thank you, I will take those setting out of the file. Why do I need to add the users to the smbpasswd file? Mathew Spurgeon Uli Luckas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/03/2003 02:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Samba] adding users to smbpasswd

2003-03-17 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
Is there a way to have users of the samba server, but not add them by smbpasswd -a UserID? I have been attempting to get this to work for a while and do not think asking the right questions. I want the samba server to be a domain member and the users to only authentic from the PDC. These are

[Samba] smbpasswd question

2003-03-12 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
When I add my windows id and password to the smbpasswd -a it works fine, however I need to add all the users to the smbpasswd and I do not know everyone's password. Is there a way to get this password directly from the PDC. I have the smb.conf file setup as security = domain and the machine

RE: [Samba] smbpasswd question

2003-03-12 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
No winbind is not running. Each user has an account on the UNIX machine Mathew Spurgeon Eli Lilly and Company Software Engineering Support Team Phone: (317) 276-7436 Mobile: (317) 716-7789 http://mcntstep03.d51.lilly.com/SEST [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris McKeever [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/2003

RE: [Samba] smbpasswd question

2003-03-12 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
They do not need local accounts, however the company do not want to support winbind Chris McKeever [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/2003 04:13 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris McKeever [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE:

[Samba] server = works domain = no work

2003-03-04 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
All, I rejoined the Samba server to the domain and it still fails to recognize users from the PDC. From Windows Network Neighborhood: As Samba running as a security = domain Name: Location: Suntst1 Unknown From Windows Network Neighborhood: As Samba running as a security = server Name:

[Samba] security domain/server

2003-03-03 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
I joined the domain with the samba server, however all the users map as nobody. If I change the smb.conf to server it works fine. OS = Solaris 9 Samba = 2.2.3a Windows PDC = Active Directory Windows Clients = 2000 smbstatus -IPC$ nobody nobody 17575 eli-c3s666jst4k

[Samba] ClearCase and Samba

2002-10-02 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
We have a samba 2.2.3 and Rational ClearCase 2002.05.20 implementation at our company. This configuration worked without a problem from April to August however now the users are getting a Connect As string from their Windows 2000 machines. If the users do an ipconfig /release and /renew the

Re: [Samba] ClearCase and Samba

2002-10-02 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
In August we started having windows domain controller issues. Could it be the number of users that are running ClearCase at a given point in time? We have between 40 - 70 users accessing the VOBs at any given time. The samba config file is setup not run security = SERVER. The error logs:

RE: [Samba] ClearCase and Samba

2002-10-02 Thread SPURGEON_MATHEW_D
What are the problems or concerns around DOMAIN vs SERVER? More specifically what impact does it have on the WINDOWS domain? # Samba config file created using SWAT # Date: 2002/09/20 12:51:09 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = INDY netbios name = SUNTST1 security = SERVER