(Windows XP SP3, ntfs filesystem).
When the file is loaded from the samba share, the user can edit and save
their powerpoint. They simply cannot run a slideshow. Regardless of the
slideshow settings, you cannot advance to the next slide.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Kevin Hall
Hi,
I'm cross-posting here from serverfault.com in case anyone can help. I
just found a similar question on askubuntu.com also without an answer.
Switched recently from W2K3 to Samba4.0.9/CentOS6.4 for our fileshare
for WinXP clients.
Have an ancient (1995!) piece of software that uses
On 2013-10-03 2:38 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:17:18AM -0400, Kevin Field wrote:
Hi,
I'm cross-posting here from serverfault.com in case anyone can help.
I just found a similar question on askubuntu.com also without an
answer.
Switched recently from W2K3
Hi,
Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving Windows XP clients here. I still
haven't sat down and figured out Windows-RID-to-unix-ID maps yet.
However, I noticed that I can put a person's lowercased name in a 'valid
users' list for a share and it works, even though they don't have a unix
account.
Hi all,
Running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving as an AD DC and
fileshare for XP clients.
Added recycler per the example at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions to my
smb.conf. Works great.
My concern is that the recycle dir will eventually grow large.
On 2013-09-26 10:20 AM, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 09/26/2013 08:47 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hi all,
Running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving as an AD DC and
fileshare for XP clients.
Added recycler per the example at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions to my
On 2013-09-26 10:37 AM, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 09/26/2013 09:24 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
On 2013-09-26 10:20 AM, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 09/26/2013 08:47 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hi all,
Running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving as an AD DC and
fileshare for XP clients.
Added recycler
On 2013-09-25 8:03 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
On 2013-09-25 2:47 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Kevin Field wrote:
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force directory mode = 0777
inherit acls = yes
inherit owner = yes
inherit permissions = yes
On a
On 2013-09-25 2:47 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Kevin Field wrote:
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force directory mode = 0777
inherit acls = yes
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 box running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC
replicating from a W2k3 box.
If I run gpresult /s OLDDC /user MYDOM\Me on a command prompt on
OLDDC, I get a normal output, listing which GPOs are applied.
If I run gpresult /s NEWDC /user MYDOM\Me in the same place, I get
of the RPC server seem to function fine and then after some
amount of time no longer seem to be available?
Thanks,
Kev
On 2013-09-06 2:49 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Nothing too interesting:
$ sudo tail -n 50 /var/log/samba/log.smbd
smbd version 4.0.8-SerNet-RedHat-4.el6 started.
Copyright
Yep, that's exactly it. Thanks!
Kev
On 2013-09-06 10:16 AM, Ricky Nance wrote:
Have you disabled syslinux? That is what that change looks like to me.
Ricky
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I just noticed something
, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
(Just for the record, I haven't restarted samba in a couple weeks now.)
That's very interesting: via the IP, it is browsable.
As for the outputs:
$ sudo netstat -anp | grep samba\|smb
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0
as needed),
also I am interested if top has anything to say about samba or smbd (as
for processor and memory usage).
Ricky
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
Yep, that's exactly it. Thanks!
Kev
On 2013-09-06 10:16 AM
I just noticed something interesting, since I have /etc under version
control: /etc/mtab changed thusly:
-tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,rootcontext=system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 0
+tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0
Does this mean anything to our troubleshooting?
Thanks,
Kev
On 2013-09-04 2:02 PM, Kevin
also wonder if, if I leave GEYSER
logged in long enough, I'll have the same result on it as I do on OLDDC.
So nobody else is having this browsability problem, eh?
Kev
On 2013-08-24 1:41 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hmm...it hasn't been long enough since a restart yet, because it's not
doing it ATM
/show_bug.cgi?id=9820
*From: *Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
*To: *samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:38:32 AM
*Subject: *[Samba] AD DC eventually not browsable without restart
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC
and see what the output of 'df
-h' is.
Ricky
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I've upgraded to 4.0.9 and this behaviour persists.
Should I file a bug report, do you think? �Is nobody else
experiencing this?
Thanks
Hi,
On CentOS 6.4 (newdc), I have CUPS 1.4.2-50.el6_4.5 installed, can
access its web interface. There I set up our main shared printer, an
OCE Imagistics cm2520, and successfully printed a test page.
With SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on the same box configured every which example
way I could find,
to the
underlying directories (even if the underlying directory is 777, because
the user simply can't get to that point)...
If anyone disagree's or could explain this better please feel free to do
so, I am not opposed to learning new things :)
Ricky
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Kevin Field k
) is 755
permissions. Samba does run as root, but it also still obeys the rules
underlying file system.
Ricky
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I can understand that.
However, I'm a bit confused about how this is supposed
to the folder it will cause things to fail, which is the case
with the 'me' part of /home/me/share as it has 0700 permissions).
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
Oh, so it only looks at the immediate parent's permissions
. Also since you are using a /home/me
before your share, you need to make sure you have at least 755
permissions in both /home and /home/me, it might be a good idea to make
a directory named /srv/mytestshare instead.
Ricky
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). When I first launch Samba using
`sudo samba`, I can go to the Windows server and browse to \\newdc in
Explorer, and I see mytestshare, netlogon, printers, sysvol, and
Printers and Faxes.
the +x on my test share directory to allow Windows to
browse it, why doesn't the -w on /srv prevent the +w on my test share
directory from allowing Windows to create files there? I always thought
negative permissions took precedence in ACL, generally?
Thanks,
Kev
On 2013-08-20 10:22 AM, Kevin
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share.
I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod and then an attempted
file save causes a shared file to become zero bytes (despite the save
not being blank, and
BTW, I just confirmed this also happens with SELinux disabled. -K
On 2013-08-20 11:23 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share.
I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod
://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9820
*From: *Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
*To: *samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:38:32 AM
*Subject: *[Samba] AD DC eventually not browsable without restart
I have
is fixed in 4.0.9:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9820
*From: *Kevin Field k...@mydomain.com
*To: *samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:38:32 AM
*Subject: *[Samba] AD DC eventually not browsable
One other thing, I just noticed that while \\newdc is still unbrowsable,
\\newdc\mytestshare works fine, as does \\newdc\netlogon.
Kev
On 2013-08-20 9:49 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Okay, I'm not sure, but I don't *think* it's that bug. First, I don't
know much about winbind, and never meant
://www.revsys.com/writings/quicktips/turn-off-selinux.html
Ricky
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is
successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. �I'm following the
HOWTO
Hi Marc,
On 2013-08-15 4:18 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hello Kevin, hello Eli,
Am 15.08.2013 05:48, schrieb Kevin Field:
I get to the step /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add
192.168.1.252 _msdcs.domain.co.il 2d59ac49-1175-4656-943e-d556baa242cb
CNAME DC2.domain.co.il -Uadministrator
I
Hi everyone,
I had posted recently about getting Samba4 to work on CentOS 6.4 but
having changes only replicating in one direction, from the Win2k3 AD but
not back to it. I solved the problem, this time, by disabling iptables.
I find it a bit hard to understand. These are the rules I have
With iptables disabled until I can figure out appropriate rules (
http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg104592.html -- what do you do
then? ) I added a user using samba-tool user add. If I go to the
Windows box and fire up ADUC, the user is not there, even though the AD
Replication Status
Thanks for your help, Thomas.
I think it was the missing state part of some of the lines. When I
use your example, it replicates, even in both directions this time!
Which is quite odd, since without iptables running, I still had problems
getting my Samba test user to replicate over to the
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is
successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. I'm following the HOWTO
here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares
[mytest]
path = /home/me/mytestshare -- with or without trailing slash
Hi Samba Peeps!
Perhaps someone can shed some light on a peculiar problem I'm seeing.
I have files located in a share on a Win2K server.
When using smbclient on my HP-UX system to look at the files on the Win2K
server I see that the timestamps are off by 1 hour.
When looking at the same files
: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
---
-Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Kevin Field
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. August 2013 16:15
Hi Eli,
I'm trying to join a freshly compiled 4.0.3 installation as an
additional DC to an existing W2K3 AD according to:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC
I have built samba 4.0.3 on CentOS 6.3 x86_64. I am using the method
that describes using the built in
I have a CentOS 6.4 box with SerNet's Samba 4.0.8 installed and no
smb.conf file yet, as it should be. I want it to become an AD DC in my
existing Windows domain, replicating from the existing Windows Server
2003 box. I have SELinux enabled and want it to stay that way.
I'm getting this error
I have change the broadcast ip (172.17.255.255) of the server.
now nmbd is working.
Thank you
kevin
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.comwrote:
It looks like you have are using a block of private class B's as a
contiguous CIDR range including 172.16
is not running ... failed!
smbd is running.
My samba configuration file
---
[global]
workgroup = KEVIN
netbios name = KEVINDC
server string = KEVIN Domain controller
obey pam restrictions = Yes
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
protocol = SMB2
W7 systems map shares, XP systems cannot map shares even if I change LAN
Manager authentication level to: Send NTLMv2 response only or Send NTLMv2
response only\refuse LM NTLM.
Any ideas?
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions
and krb5 support... yes
checking for ldap_initialize... (cached) no
configure: error: Active Directory support requires ldap_initialize
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
All,
I'm trying to build Samba 3.6.12 on Solaris 8 sparc using studio 12. Is this
the correct forum to ask questions?
This is my first build so any tips/tricks are appreciated.
What are the prerequisites to get samba to compile so that it will join an AD
domain?
TIA,
-Kevin
I can patch Solaris 10 to get Samba 3.6.12 and takes about 5 mins to complete.
I know moving off Solaris 8 would be the best path to take however it's not my
decision to make...
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org
All,
I need to build samba 3.6.12 on solaris 8 using studio 12. Has anyone
accomplished this and willing to share tips, tricks, or notes?
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
?
Thanks
--
Kevin Blackwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
.conf.DOM get created when net
ads join is run. I've also noticed that the kdc is set to an IP address and
appears to be dynamic. Can someone tell me what/how this file is controlled and
if there are smb.conf settings to manually control this file?
TIA,
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
.keytab with no luck. Any ideas?
TIA
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Can anyone tell me if Kerberos is a requirement for windows server 2008R2 AD
NTLM or NTLMv2 authentication?
TIA,
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
What is the earliest version of Samba that will authenticate in a native 2008R2
AD?
Is Kerberos a requirement to authenticate to native 2008R2 AD?
TIA,
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
= Yes
[read]
fake oplocks= Yes
path
Thanks in advance.
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
This appears to be an IDMAP username mapping issue not an issue with the
username map file.
I think this is not an issue with the username map file. Thanks for the reply.
-Kevin
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Kevin Shaw wrote:
When the company upgraded AD from 2003 to 2008R2 users lost the
ability
directory security mask = 777
inherit permissions = Yes
guest ok= Yes
[read]
fake oplocks= Yes
path
TIA,
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
.
---
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907) 586 - 0905
-Original Message-
From: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:55 AM
To: Kevin Elliott
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] User
to AD are'nt add in DNS
(I use internal DNS).
Any suggestions ?
Thanks,
Kevin C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] User is invalid on this system
Am Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:51:55 -0900 schrieb Kevin Elliott:
Hello all.
We are running Samba 3.6.6 on a Debian 6.0.6 server. We made the
upgrade from 3.6.5 to 3.6.5 about a week ago and ever since we have
lost
this?
Thanks.
---
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907) 586 - 0905
-Original Message-
From: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:38 AM
To: Kevin Elliott
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re
)
NativeOS=[] NativeLanMan=[] PrimaryDomain=[]
[2012/11/29 15:23:58.120498, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:660(reply_spnego_negotiate)
reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 1680
[2012/11/29 15:23:58.124198, 3] libads/authdata.c:332(decode_pac_data)
Found account name from PAC: kevin_elliott [Kevin
LIBRARY:base_rid = 0
idmap config LIBRARY:range = 65535-7
Does anyone have any idea why not explictly specifying the domain fixes this
issue?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:18
To: Kevin Elliott
Cc
= 0775
directory mask = 0775
hide unreadable = Yes
Thank you for your consideration.
--
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907) 586 - 0905
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
I'm still trying to track this down, to see if I can offer any further info.
Increasing the log level shows that all of the history requests are happening
in pdb_ldap.c, but I don't know that I saw where it was setting the history
during a password change.
I'm also seeing a lot of 'Failed to
Ok, here's an update. I recreated a user account and started changing the
password on it, and now I'm seeing passwords stored in the sambapasswordhistory
field. Each time I change it another one is stored.
Then, suddenly, the entire sambapasswordhistory entry is wiped clean and it's
only
Interesting.
I'l try this and see what happens.
Any idea why setting such an aggressive cache refresh time for the idmap issue
could resovle this?
--
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907) 586 - 0905
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun
We would like to have password history working in our setup which is samba with
Sun Directory Services 7.0 on the backend. Everything else seems to be working
ok, but I notice that the sambapasswordhistory entry for any particular user is
filled with 0's.
If I set the password for the
No one else has seen this issue?
Should I move this to samba-technical? Or submit a bug report?
Is there any other information that would be helpful in troubleshooting this?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Elliott
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 9:51 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
= No
winbind nested groups = Yes
winbind expand groups = 1
winbind nss info = template
winbind refresh tickets = No
winbind offline logon = No
winbind normalize names = No
--
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907
: *
sid : S-0-0
result : NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED
--
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907) 586 - 0905
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
Correction. I was reading the Debian versioning numbers.
We are on Samba/Winbind: 3.5.6 (Debian package: 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze6).
--
Kevin Elliott
Network Specialist
City and Borough of Juneau, MIS
(907) 586 - 0905
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
utility is updating the correct backend based on
the smb.conf setting. I did run a service smbd reload each time I changed
the config file.
Any suggestions?
Kevin T. Broderick
IT Communications Coordinator
KILLINGTON MOUNTAIN SCHOOL
E: kbroder...@killingtonmountainschool.org
P: 802-422-5671
F: 802
.
Kevin Taylor
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
These are XP clients.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:28:33 -0700
From: j...@samba.org
To: groucho.64...@hotmail.com
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Very slow write performance to RAID
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:06:48PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote:
We have a RAID set up
We have a RAID set up as our main fileserver (running samba 3.0.33 on linux,
CentOS 5). The main disk area is an XFS partition of about 8TB. I'm using
iostat to monitor disk I/O since we've gotten complaints about speed and I'm
noticing that when I write something to the samba share, the write
@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Very slow write performance to RAID
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Kevin Taylor
groucho.64...@hotmail.com wrote:
We have a RAID set up as our main fileserver (running samba 3.0.33 on
linux, CentOS 5). The main disk area is an XFS partition of about
troubleshooter for assistance? Nothing useful (or even
apparently related) appears in the System or Application logs on the client.
Kevin T. Broderick
IT Communications Coordinator
KILLINGTON MOUNTAIN SCHOOL
E: kbroder...@killingtonmountainschool.org
P: 802-422-5671
F: 802-422-5678
/1/14 Kevin Taylor groucho.64...@hotmail.com:
I did give it a try with no luck. However, I'm not sure that the way the
pam rules I have set out would cause that to trip anyway.
On most of our linux machines, we'd have the system-auth looking like this
(what is the default generated
:56:29 +0900
Subject: Re: [Samba] another question about account locking
From: mo...@monyo.com
To: groucho.64...@hotmail.com
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
2011/1/14 Kevin Taylor groucho.64...@hotmail.com:
I did give it a try with no luck. However, I'm not sure that the way the
pam rules I
Is there a way that we can increment the samba bad password count, when a user
fails a password on a linux system? I'm looking for ways to get both Windows
and Linux to simultaneously lock out accounts if they fail so many times. We're
using an LDAP backend.
...@hotmail.com
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
2011/1/13 Kevin Taylor groucho.64...@hotmail.com:
Is there a way that we can increment the samba bad password count, when a
user fails a password on a linux system? I'm looking for ways to get both
Windows and Linux to simultaneously lock out accounts
,
but it's really the interactive logins I need to lock.
Sorry if I'm being difficult about it. :)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:38:05 +0900
Subject: Re: [Samba] another question about account locking
From: mo...@monyo.com
To: groucho.64...@hotmail.com
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
2011/1/14 Kevin
] another question about account locking
From: mo...@monyo.com
To: groucho.64...@hotmail.com
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
2011/1/14 Kevin Taylor groucho.64...@hotmail.com:
I did give it a try with no luck. However, I'm not sure that the way the
pam rules I have set out would cause
I thought I would ask here to see if anyone has had a similar situation and a
solution.
We've got a SunOne Directory Server set up to authenticate our users on Linux.
To get shared authentication with Windows, we set up Samba (2.0.33 as ships
with CentOS 5) and the smbldap-tools.
What we
There are numerous issues with the original poster's request.
For one, he doesn't want to deal with the complexities of a Windows domain or
home group - but considers ripping out the heart of Windows networking and
replacing it with Samba. That's akin to taking your brand new Hybrid car to the
That is conceptually not possible, because logged in means that the user is
authenticated - and that is always server-wide or even domain-wide (unless you
use per-share authentication).
If you did kill his smbd subprocess, he could connect right back. What you
could do is change the permission
It may also be network discovery, and/or an IPv6 issue. Windows 7 tries to
default to IPv6. There is no NETBIOS or WINS in IPv6, so DNS is pretty much
mandatory (there also is Network Discovery, which is basically UPnP renamed).
My guess is that in your case, Windows 7 first tries to resolve
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-
boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Morty
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:08 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba 4 for new authentication domain?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:36:39PM +1200,
Exactly WHY do you need AD instead of NT domains? Without understanding that, I
don't think your question can be answered. In some cases, you can use a
stand-alone Kerberos and/or LDAP server. Or conversely, some application you
use may require a Microsoft AD server, sometimes even a specific
Greetings,
I have a service running on a Windows Server 2003 box that I want to write to a
Samba share running on Solaris 10. The Samba is not a DC. How can I give access
to the Local System user on the Windows box without making the share writeable
to any other user or system?
Regards,
KB
It's a MS SQL database service. Our standard is to have it run as Local System.
KB
-Original Message-
From: Damien Dye [mailto:damien.j@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:27 PM
To: Kevin A. Brown; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Allow Local System user
, and if you want to see
the smb.conf let me know and I can try to get that posted.
If anyone has any insight or help to offer, it would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Kevin Taylor
_
Hotmail
to see
the smb.conf let me know and I can try to get that posted.
If anyone has any insight or help to offer, it would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Kevin Taylor
_
Hotmail is redefining busy
I think part of your problem is that both of your NICs are on the same subnet.
That will usually cause headaches; it confuses the routing table. It is
entirely possible that Samba responds from IP 10.0.0.246 even when the
connection goes to .245 - and you don't have firewall rules for that.
It's probably an authentication or permission problem. Since you can see
\\Server, name resolution is working, but the Samba server won't let your XP
user have access to anything. To confirm that this is the problem, try turning
on guest accounts with the setting
(be careful with this setting;
First of all, Windows actually is case sensitive, too (at least on NTFS, not on
FAT). You can actually create C:\tmp\foo and C:\tmp\Foo at the same time, just
not in Explorer (or though most standard Windows APIs).
Secondly, even with case sensitive = No , Samba is not truly case insensitive
You are probably right. Remember that a Samba domain is based on a Windows NT
technology, more than ten years old. Almost everything Microsoft now relies on
Active Directory.
Create an Active Directory domain with a Windows domain controller, and make
your Samba Server a member. Samba works
Quite possibly, this is not actually a Samba problem. Quickbooks is pretty
poorly written and goes very deep into the system; simple file sharing isn't
enough to get it to work. In fact, the main reason Microsoft implemented UAC in
Windows Vista was that Intuit had flat out refused to fix the
The problem with dual-booting is that you end up with two DNS records pointing
to the same IP address. Active Directory regularly tries to contact the clients
one by one (it does that for any number of administrative purposes). If the
machine is turned off and isn't responding at all - no
When my server boots up, samba doesn't load itself at boot. I have to
login Webmin and restart the Samba server, then everything works fine.
Ubuntu Server edition 9.04 - 9.10 (its upgrading right now)
Thanks
-Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
1 - 100 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
