On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 01:32:42PM +1100, hce wrote:
Hi Yan,
On Dec 20, 2007 1:10 PM, Yan Seiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 9:14 AM, Hugo Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happen to know there was a port of an early version of samba (version
2.0.10
.. Original Message ...
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:17:25 +1100 Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hce wrote:
Yes, you are right, there are many solutions if you are a computer
skilled people or at least can play anothing on the computers. I am a
linux user myself, I can do whatever
hce wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 12:27 PM, Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
It is actually to mount a dumb linux device to a window file system,
just like to mount an usb stick to the window file system. Yes, if the
linux device (without samba on it) can be mounted by a
On Dec 20, 2007 9:14 AM, Hugo Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 12:27 PM, Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
It is actually to mount a dumb linux device to a window file system,
just like to mount an usb stick to the window file system. Yes,
hce wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 9:14 AM, Hugo Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happen to know there was a port of an early version of samba (version
2.0.10 stripped down) to a system that operates on embedded devices,
such as a large set of wireless access points/routers using a certain
nothing to do with
SAMBA!
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g] Per conto di hce
Inviato: mercoledì 12 dicembre 2007 0.47
A: samba@lists.samba.org
Oggetto: [Samba] SAMBA under window?
Hi,
I am thinking a network configuration where
hce wrote:
Let me clarify it again.
(a) The key point is that the linux device is too small to install a
large size of Samba. No question about it, if the linux device had an
samba, the window could mount the linux device.
(b) The small linux device is a dumb device, it may be configured by a
hce wrote:
It is actually to mount a dumb linux device to a window file system,
just like to mount an usb stick to the window file system. Yes, if the
linux device (without samba on it) can be mounted by a window file
syste, then the window can config the linux device, modify data and
transfer
On Dec 19, 2007 11:41 AM, Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
Let me clarify it again.
(a) The key point is that the linux device is too small to install a
large size of Samba. No question about it, if the linux device had an
samba, the window could mount the linux
On Dec 19, 2007 12:27 PM, Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
It is actually to mount a dumb linux device to a window file system,
just like to mount an usb stick to the window file system. Yes, if the
linux device (without samba on it) can be mounted by a window file
hce wrote:
Yes, you are right, there are many solutions if you are a computer
skilled people or at least can play anothing on the computers. I am a
linux user myself, I can do whatever you want to play from my linux
box, I don't even need windows. But what about those who can only run
window
On Dec 19, 2007 3:00 PM, simo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:24 +1100, hce wrote:
But what about those who can only run
window file system, and only simply copy or delete files from the
window file systm, who has no idea to intall and run window ssh, scp
or ftp?
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:24 +1100, hce wrote:
But what about those who can only run
window file system, and only simply copy or delete files from the
window file systm, who has no idea to intall and run window ssh, scp
or ftp? (please don't ask me again why I should support them.)
Jim,
a
Hallo, hce,
Du (webmail.hce) meintest am 14.12.07:
To be honest, I don't know either, that's why I am aking :-). But,
basically, I have many small linux devices (mobile, handset) which
want to connect to a web server, or file system in a window to
download html pages and to transfer files.
On 12/14/07, Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hce wrote:
To be hornest, I don't know either, that's why I am aking :-). But,
basically, I have many small linux devices (mobile, handset) which
want to connect to a web server, or file system in a window to
download html pages and to
On Dec 13, 2007 1:25 PM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. May be I should clarify it. Samba is normally installed under
linux system, but some people only have window system (or they only
use window system), but want to the web server and Samba server are
installed on window
To be hornest, I don't know either, that's why I am aking :-). But,
basically, I have many small linux devices (mobile, handset) which
want to connect to a web server, or file system in a window to
download html pages and to transfer files. Of cause, there is no Samba
in the small linux
hce wrote:
To be hornest, I don't know either, that's why I am aking :-). But,
basically, I have many small linux devices (mobile, handset) which
want to connect to a web server, or file system in a window to
download html pages and to transfer files. Of cause, there is no Samba
in the small
On Dec 12, 2007 2:32 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking a network configuration where a SAMBA server is
installed in a window machine so that the web server on that window
machine can talk to linux devices. Is it possible, or it is a stupid
idea?
There is no
I know. May be I should clarify it. Samba is normally installed under
linux system, but some people only have window system (or they only
use window system), but want to the web server and Samba server are
installed on window so that the linux devices can talk to web server
and window files
hce wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 2:32 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking a network configuration where a SAMBA server is
installed in a window machine so that the web server on that window
machine can talk to linux devices. Is it possible, or it is a stupid
idea?
Michael Heydon wrote:
but if you just want to share directories from the windows system then
you really don't need samba.
What if you have a non-server version of Windows and wanted to use it as
a domain controller or do something more tricky than Windows allows
(especially XP Home's
Tim Bates wrote:
Michael Heydon wrote:
but if you just want to share directories from the windows system
then you really don't need samba.
What if you have a non-server version of Windows and wanted to use it
as a domain controller or do something more tricky than Windows allows
Ray Anderson wrote:
Tim Bates wrote:
Michael Heydon wrote:
but if you just want to share directories from the windows system
then you really don't need samba.
What if you have a non-server version of Windows and wanted to use it
as a domain controller or do something more tricky than
Tim Bates wrote:
Michael Heydon wrote:
but if you just want to share directories from the windows system
then you really don't need samba.
What if you have a non-server version of Windows and wanted to use it
as a domain controller or do something more tricky than Windows allows
(especially
Hallo, hce,
Du (webmail.hce) meintest am 13.12.07:
I know. May be I should clarify it. Samba is normally installed under
linux system, but some people only have window system (or they only
use window system), but want to the web server and Samba server are
installed on window
Web server? no
Hi,
I am thinking a network configuration where a SAMBA server is
installed in a window machine so that the web server on that window
machine can talk to linux devices. Is it possible, or it is a stupid
idea?
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
I am thinking a network configuration where a SAMBA server is
installed in a window machine so that the web server on that window
machine can talk to linux devices. Is it possible, or it is a stupid
idea?
There is no need to install Samba on Windows; Samba does what Windows
natively
28 matches
Mail list logo
