Title: winbindd: Here's a replacement get_id_from_sid() that gets UNIX uid/gid from /home/dir
rebuilding winbindd with the enclosed replacement function gets the UNIX uid/gid from the users home directory. If it fails in anyway, it returns (g/u)id of 'nobody' This obviously allows
Seem the same logic tridge and abartlet found about authentication
against w2k.
Seem a childish way to avoid possible DoS oir something like that.
If you have not finished authentication and the same client issue a
second request, w2k drops the connection.
And if I remember correctly, this
Hi Andrew,
here's the patch...
for the samba.schema
added 'userPassword' as MAY to sambaAccount
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Npur --exclude=CVS HEAD/examples/LDAP/samba.schema
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 04:53, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
Are all these things strictly local decisions or are they now all encoded
in groups, or are there some capability bits associated with users?
A new complete SAM system is being introduced into HEAD.
In the plans this new SAM will
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 03:10, Ferguson, Ross wrote:
rebuilding winbindd with the enclosed replacement function gets the UNIX
uid/gid from the users home directory. If it fails in anyway, it returns
(g/u)id of 'nobody' This obviously allows specifically assigned uid's per
user, allowing
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
Seem the same logic tridge and abartlet found about authentication
against w2k.
Seem a childish way to avoid possible DoS oir something like that.
If you have not finished authentication and the same client issue a
second request, w2k drops the
Hi!
I still don't get it... I just updated my cvs, recompiled... and I still
can't get my
machines join the domain. I have both add machine and add user script
defined, and
the machines which already are in the domain work.
Older versions of samba needed root in the domain admins group. As
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Andrew,
here's the patch...
It adds a new parameter to smb.conf 'ldap passwd sync = Yes | No | Only':
A question: there are some plan to merge this code in the SAMBA_3_
branch or is intended only for HEAD?
Thanks,
Ignacio
--
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 04:53, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
Are all these things strictly local decisions or are they now all encoded
in groups, or are there some capability bits associated with users?
A new complete SAM system is being introduced
i've just been messing with this for XP joining (maybe 2k is similar)
don't forget to turn of spnego and apply the signorseal fix to the
client
i also had problems with head trying to create machine accounts that
were already in the ldap db or trying to create them twice.
i spent a bit of time
10 matches
Mail list logo