Hello,
Using smbgroupedit, should I link groups to ldap groups, those in /etc/group
(if I also would define them in there) or both?
Or none? (If using ldap)
Eddie.
Samba 3.0, compiled on RedHat 7.0 (up to date), 28 September 2002 08:05 CET.
Warnings:
Compiling smbd/mangle_hash2.c
smbd/mangle_hash2.c: In function `cache_insert':
smbd/mangle_hash2.c:172: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer
without a cast
smbd/mangle_hash2.c: In function
Eddie Lania wrote:
Hello,
Using smbgroupedit, should I link groups to ldap groups, those in /etc/group
(if I also would define them in there) or both?
Or none? (If using ldap)
the groups are stored in the group_mapping.tdb... I think mapping is
unix--NT, but not LDAP groups (perhaps with
I have been running LDAP based Samba PDCs since more than half a year now with
great success (Thanks Samba team!).
There have been some changes in the LDAP schema for Samba (I think mostly OID
changes).
Are there any special actions needed when switching the old LDAP schema with a
new one
Hi,
I am using smblib 0.50. I have a NT PDC. I would
like to change the password form Linuxbox running a
webserver. I tried using the test program.
It works with admin password. But does not work with
normal user password. The programe test_password
returns 2466 status when tried to
balagurumoorthy shanmuganathan wrote:
Hi,
I am using smblib 0.50. I have a NT PDC. I would
like to change the password form Linuxbox running a
webserver. I tried using the test program.
It works with admin password. But does not work with
normal user password. The programe
I was wondering: In the new SAM stuff do we really need the api.c?
Why not make the api the context_ functions, and use the default context
if the user does not specify one (ie NULL)?
This would remove one layer from this whole area, which might make it
easier to comprehend...
In the passdb
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, balagurumoorthy shanmuganathan wrote:
Hi,
I am using smblib 0.50. I have a NT PDC. I would
like to change the password form Linuxbox running a
webserver. I tried using the test program.
Please don't. That code is ancient. There are plenty of better ways to do
I am working on adding sys resolving code to Samba to support that meta-token
in AFS, to handle retrieving files from AFS filespace through Samba while still
being able to use the client system platform identifier rather than the one
from the Samba server itself.
The customer that is interested
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Kris Van Hees wrote:
I am working on adding @sys resolving code to Samba to support that meta-token
in AFS, to handle retrieving files from AFS filespace through Samba while still
being able to use the client system platform identifier rather than the one
from the Samba
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:56:29AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Do we need
sam/api.c?':
I was wondering: In the new SAM stuff do we really need the api.c?
Why not make the api the context_ functions, and use the default context
if the user does not specify one (ie NULL)?
This would
Eddie
The answer to this really depends on what it is that you are trying to do and
how you want to manage your site. Which comes back to people and processes
more than anything else. Strictly speaking Samba use of LDAP and Unix use of
LDAP for user account data have absolutely nothing to do
This has been around for a while. A fix that seems to work (at least it seems
to for me) has been posted more than once to the list. I do not know why it
hasn't been applied.
It is simple to fix. In utils/testparm.c file;
Change line 54:
if (lp_wins_support() wins_srv_count()) {
Hi Andrew,
I've updated my sam_ads module can you merge the changes to HEAD?
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I've updated my sam_ads module can you merge the changes to HEAD?
Done.
Kai: I'll take your sam_passdb stuff in as soon as you like - it's
easier to track if we keep it all in CVS.
(Yes, the bar on 'must be fully functional' is lower while
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 03:00:27PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Kris Van Hees wrote:
Description of sys patch omitted.
That would very much depend on what you are proposing. This kind of
thing is quite difficult with encrypted passwords, and I am generally
opposed to adding this kind of
16 matches
Mail list logo
