Re: heimdal didn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY

2003-02-01 Thread Luke Howard
Please try the following patch (attached). This patch also includes a few other things, so edit as appropriate: - support for the DCE NP funnel (available from http://www.padl.com/~lukeh/XAD/dce_funnel.tar.gz) - support for using the keytab instead of the secrets database - support for usin

Re: NBT length parameter larger than necessary in session request

2003-02-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
"Michael B. Allen" wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Ever notice smbclient sends an NBT session request with an NBT length > field that is 4 bytes longer than necessary? No harm, but is there a > reason for this? Yes. It was a bug. The header length was being added to the total length. It didn't cause a

AW: "Random" problem with file locking

2003-02-01 Thread Hans-Joerg Wolff
> > every now and then I find in the logfiles the following > messages from > > samba (v2.2.7): > > > > [2003/01/05 15:02:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) > > tdb(/var/lock/samba/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_oob len -2320 > beyond eof > > at 8192 [2003/01/05 15:02:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(5

Re: file change notification issues

2003-02-01 Thread Juergen Hasch
Jeremy, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great detective work ! Actaully this is a bug in IIS. The protocol states that STATUS_NOTIFY_ENUM_DIR is a valid return, if too many files were changed (hmmm. define "too many" :-). It would be possible to cause this to break on Windows 2000 servers also, but I

Re: Printing in Samba.

2003-02-01 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 07:43, Erik Jakobsen wrote: > Hi. > > Please tell if this is the list to ask questions about > printing & samba. nope - ask at [EMAIL PROTECTED] brad

RE: Finding group members - fix to winbindd_ads.c

2003-02-01 Thread Ken Cross
Andrew et al: On further reflection, you may want to reconsider my original patch. Currently, if you do WINBINDD_GETGRNAM to an NT domain, you get *all* the members of a group, whether primary or supplemental. The same call to an AD just returns supplemental members. My patch causes the call

Printing in Samba.

2003-02-01 Thread Erik Jakobsen
Hi. Please tell if this is the list to ask questions about printing & samba. -- mvh Erik Jakobsen.

REPOST: Meaning of "tdb_free: left read failed at ...?"

2003-02-01 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Hi there, I can't believe that NO-ONE of you tech guys can comment on this?! Thanks, Ralf = 8x == Hi there, since I upgraded our fileserver running Debian 3.0/i386 with Samba 2.2.7a (a package I created myself) I'm seeing the following messages

heimdal didn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY

2003-02-01 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi Jeremy, the latest HEAD didn't not compile with heimdal on SuSE8.1 because AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY is not defined in the heimdal/krb5.h only in the MIT krb5.h :-( is it possible to fix samba that it finally compiles fine? (in libads/krb5_setpw.c) and this : Compiling libads/kerberos_verify.c lib

heimdal didn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY

2003-02-01 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi Jeremy, the latest HEAD didn't not compile with heimdal on SuSE8.1 because AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY is not defined in the heimdal/krb5.h only in the MIT krb5.h :-( is it possible to fix samba that it finally compiles fine? metze ---

Re: Status of docs merge to 3.0

2003-02-01 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 01 February 2003 09:07, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them > to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to > have a slightly different syntax in HEAD (XML c

Status of docs merge to 3.0

2003-02-01 Thread Andrew Bartlett
I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to have a slightly different syntax in HEAD (XML compliant?) So, should I just merge my text changes, or wait for the lot to be merged or? Andrew Bartlett -- A