090156 metze ctrlsoft: I think the modules stuff should not merged into 3_0 untill
we have discused how module loading should be finally done in samba
What I will be merging into 3_0 at first is just some basic helper
functions for the modules. it's currently only the smb_load_module()
function
But I'm REALLY NOT FINE with a parameter name 'winbind backend' for
this!!!
winbind backends are RPC and ADS.
we should name this parameter 'idmap backend' or something like that.
please, please change this fast! :-)
otherwise it will be bad to change this parameter because everyone has it
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 23:01, Jim McDonough wrote:
But I'm REALLY NOT FINE with a parameter name 'winbind backend' for
this!!!
winbind backends are RPC and ADS.
we should name this parameter 'idmap backend' or something like that.
please, please change this fast! :-)
otherwise it will
Hi,
I´d like to ask you if it is possible to connect a Winxp cleint to a Linux Suse 6.4
with Samba 2.0.4 fileserver, when yes how.
Several times I like to connect my WinXP client to the Fileserver and I can see him
but I cannot the directories how does it comes ??
In advance thank you very
At 11:43 21.02.2003 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
090156 metze ctrlsoft: I think the modules stuff should not merged into
3_0 untill
we have discused how module loading should be finally done in samba
What I will be merging into 3_0 at first is just some basic helper
functions for the modules.
I agree, Stefan suggestions are good.
Simo.
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:52, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jim, Anthony,
It's nice to see that someone is working on the idmap backend stuff :-)
But I'm REALLY NOT FINE with a parameter name 'winbind backend' for this!!!
winbind backends
So I've renamed the paramater to 'idmap backend', but I've left it in the
nsswitch directory for the moment...since that will take some more effort
and planning, and it seems we should have the apis better defined.
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 14:30, Keith Hamilton wrote:
Hey,
Is it possible to configure Samba to run as a PDC on 2 domains?
Hi,
I don't think so.
I would try to run 2 sambas. Just put config stuff in different
directories, add IP alias and bind sambas to different IPs.
The only thing that
http://www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba/showoff/
AmigaOS now broke the 1mb/s barrier ;D
Any input on Ethereal SMB RTT values for tuning ?
Doubling TCP window gave an 10-15% increase actualy.
Bottleneck now is cpu peaking at 99% at ~1MB IO.
FTP peak at 1.5MB/S.
Have an wonderful CRC free
AC_SEARCH_LIBS and AC_CHECK_LIB are used to find a function and then add its
library to the LIBS variable. The macros can deal with the fact that the
function might be missing, in a library, or available but not in any
library. The configure script, in both head and 3.0, uses these macros to
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Keith Hamilton wrote:
Hey,
Is it possible to configure Samba to run as a PDC on 2 domains?
If you run two separate copies of Samba :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
I observed it while running the following modified torture test:
static BOOL run_locktest7(int dummy)
{
static struct cli_state cli1;
const char *fname = \\lockt7.lck;
int fnum1;
BOOL ret;
char buf[200];
BOOL correct = True;
if
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
I observed it while running the following modified torture test:
Thanks ! That saves me from writing one :-) :-). I'll look into it
asap !
Jeremy.
hello everyone, im new in this list and i have this problem..
I have a win2000 domain controller in subnet 172.17.0.x and a linux
server in 172.17.20.x (DHCP assign) The DC not solve the ip /
netbiosname relation (A record i think..) like a win98 / NT /2000
If i ping the linux server from
Steve Langasek [mailto:vorlon@xx] suggests:
Sometimes, it's useful to be able to build (and install)
static libraries even on platforms that support shared
libraries. The attached patch brings in a few macros from
libtool's aclocal.m4, to add --enable-shared and
--enable-static
The readahead that the Linux page manager does (see mm/readahead.c) seems
more sensible than what you are seeing with the Windows client - if you are
trying to excercise your server in this way you might try the clients using
the current version of Linux 2.5 kernel mounted with the cifs vfs or
Hi there!
Although I am most focused on Windows clients since that is what our
customers use, this would be a great thing to try to attempt to exonerate
samba (not that much suspicion lies there anyway :)). It would be an
interesting data point. I can't believe that I can't find *any*
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
I observed it while running the following modified torture test:
Great test. I've applied a modified version of it to smbtorture in HEAD
and fixed the bug in Samba's locking implementation. Thanks !
Jeremy.
18 matches
Mail list logo