On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:34:16 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
What exactly does that mean? I compiled Samba with large file support.
Was this an error? I absolutely NEED large-file support. (To recap, this
is under Debian/GNU Linux/i386
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:20:26 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
[...]
Looks like the tdb went over the 4Gb line. As a quick work around,
Stop nmbd; rm /var/run/samba/unexpected.tdb; and start nmbd back up.
No, this has never been a work-around. The problem comes up again VERY quickly.
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
The system in question is a Debian i386 stable (3.0) system, kernel is
2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in
use
for shares exported via Samba!!), Samba is 2.2.7a (a Debian package that I
created
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back again.
:-(
So you could argue, Ok, it's EVMS then which is the culprit, because
filesystem is on an EVMS logical volume.
But I simply cannot believe
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back
again. :-(
Thanks nevertheless. As one resort, could you try
use mmap = no
Volker
msg05756/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
The system in question is a Debian i386 stable (3.0) system, kernel is
2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in
use
for shares
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:37:17 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Why should Samba be the ONLY (apparent) application that doesn't feel hap=
py with=20
XFS over EVMS?
I'm running Samba on XFS+EVMS (on Debian ;) with no problems. Even on
buggy versions of XFS, I've never seen this error; I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
since I upgraded our fileserver running Debian 3.0/i386 with Samba 2.2.7a (a
package I created myself) I'm seeing the following messages in syslog:
Jan 28 14:55:50 Fileserver nmbd[22451]: [2003/01/28
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
you can try to delete unexpected.tdb
it does not hold any vital information.
The problem has reappeared even after I removed the above file:
Feb 2 11:18:29 Fileserver
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
you can try to delete unexpected.tdb
it does not hold any vital information.
The problem has reappeared even after I removed
Hi there,
since I upgraded our fileserver running Debian 3.0/i386 with Samba 2.2.7a (a
package I created myself) I'm seeing the following messages in syslog:
Jan 28 14:55:50 Fileserver nmbd[22451]: [2003/01/28 14:55:50, 0]
tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531)
Jan 28 14:55:50 Fileserver nmbd[22451]:
11 matches
Mail list logo
